Is this can considered as spam?

[happybitcoinph]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2141416.0;topicseen

https://web.archive.org/web/20170901234353/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2141416.0;topicseen

User involved: MBworld https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1049231

Look it's clear that the project is detailing their ANN and no bounties have been announced yet.

Isn't it niced to just asked questions first if there is a bounty or say something about the project rather than "RESERVING ***** TRANSLATION" first?

[bluefirecorp_]

Instead of making a thread in meta, you could just report the post as "spam" and then a moderator will decide then if it actually is. But instead you've created a post giving that post more viability...and created a thread for more shitposting. 

[spngebob]

From all spam you decided to report this one user asking for a job.

I don't see this as spam, something we can't say for that announcement thread(or 5 of them in altcoin announcement section).

[actmyname]

From all spam you decided to report this one user asking for a job.

Spam is relative and so is action, but the thread is an inquiry.

I don't see this as spam, something we can't say for that announcement thread(or 5 of them in altcoin announcement section).

Did you just insert that part in to make your post look longer?

Clearly, the post is unwarranted given the announcement. Though it is likely that the owner of the ICO would want the product to reach more demographics, there was simply no request nor any intention of requesting it in the future within the first post.

[Xenoph0bia]

I don't think that, it could not be considered as spam.

[coolcoinz]

Spot reserving isn't spamming. If you really wanted to report some of this user's activity there are better examples, like bumping a thread every 2 minutes.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2134337.msg21426726#msg21426726

[spngebob]

I don't see this as spam, something we can't say for that announcement thread(or 5 of them in altcoin announcement section).

Did you just insert that part in to make your post look longer?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2141459.0 ann pre-ico EVR
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2141436.0 ann pre-ico EVR
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2141431.0 pre-ann? EVR
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2141424.0 pre-ann EVR
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2141416.0 pre-ann EVR

Did you just say that without researching part of my post which you think I added just to make my post looks longer? 

[actmyname]

Did you just say that without researching part of my post which you think I added just to make my post looks longer? 

Unfortunately, you are not being articulate enough with your replies and thus a degree of cohesive communication is lost. The primary clause, "I don't see this as spam" is not linked well with the secondary, "something we can't say for that announcement thread (or 5 of them in altcoin announcement section)". The principal idea that is missing for me here is the fact that your attention was redirected toward the creator of the announcement thread.

A better wording would be something along the lines of, "I don't see this as spam however the same cannot be said regarding the announcement thread: there were five unnecessary threads created by Net5ky which all comprised of the same details."

[LTU_btc]

Reserving of translations is very annoying spam and this user is not exception. Altcoins ann board is full off such posts. Many people trying to reserve translation imnediately after they notice new ann thread. These people don't read what is written in Announcement, they keep posting such messages even if coin devs haven't mentioned anything about transaltion bounty.