Is ICO regulation good or bad?

[Azuliand]

ICO regulation in certain framework will give the result. for example even verification of the developers will decrease the chance of scam.

Of course it would be good if all projects were regulated , there were much less scams in the market , but now of course there are very few projects that are subject to current regulation , but in the future I think there will be much less Scam with ico!

[kalstarzz]

if indeed this ICO will be regulated it will be very good, because the existence of rules will reduce or even eliminate ICO scam, only the lack of this rule will very rarely emerge a new ICO project.

[Georgiyk]

Soon in many countries of the world, ICO will become regulated: with its trading platforms, rules, laws, etc. And this is good, the law will contain the legal provisions of ICO participants, the rules and standards will scare off scams. Secondly, the investor will be able to protect their rights in court.

[malading]

I think this should be a way to save the cryptocurrency market. If ICO is bad for the cryptocurrency market and no one wants to see it, ICO regulation may be more suitable for the future cryptocurrency market.

[ngano ba]

I am voted for regulation of ICO is there is any form ,it will be good for cryptocurrency because the investors will run away because of this scam ICO projects being launched , so if there is any regulation implemented for ICO then its better for the cryptocurrency community.

[KOF97]

I think it is necessary to supervise ICO because it can effectively prevent the increase in fraud. When there are no more ICO fraudsters, the ICO market will be better developed.

[pri3oner]

ICO regulation is NEEDED. Whatever people would say, we have seen a lot of thieves for these years, now it must be regulated to avoid it and save the faith in crypto.

[DRVX]

Given the rules in the ICO program, the ICO can carry out its mission and achieve its objectives as expected. In addition, it also suppresses the fraud rate that can be done in the ICO program. So that the ICO succeeded and produced many benefits for its participants and investors.

Its true, if ICOs regulated by government, it will reducing scam ICO. 2018 is not good year for crypto investor because beside market drop the value, many ICOs are scam. If government regulate ICOs, hopely investor more confident to investing their money in market and it will gain positive perspective for cryptocurrency

In a case when the ICOs are regulated, the possibility that some scam project can appear is less. That is why I find it good. People are sick and tired of being deceived by certain dishonest projects.

[Convery]

Crypto was created to make peer to peer transaction without any other supervisor, regulator or provider.
So if you want to protect investors, this way is not the best one.

[randyg29]

I think having a regulations for the ICO's is really good to prevent from investing our money to a scam projects that are always appear. And it will help all the investors to invest their money in a legit projects that will give them a better earnings in the future.

[rhomzkie26]

In my perception on this things, ICO regulation isn't bad, in fact it can actually give a big help for us to any scammer in my opinion.
One of the good example for this was Japan,they've already regulated digital currency to their own nation which is showed and proven that regulating it is an advantage.

[vova.andreyan.94]

So far it is difficult to say how regulation will respond in the cryptocurrency market, because they see this as a hope for safe investments, and it may turn out to be absolutely not profitable for the ICO!

[Stervyatnik]

Perhaps the regulators will help to develop the market in the right direction, but maybe not! Find out when we see it!

[andreizver]

Some regulations is not so bad and it is protection for investors. But maybe regulation break the main idea of all cryptocurrency sphere - decentralization. Crypto enthusiast still say that they wont to be in legal sphere but want decentralized structure.

[GWS My Boy]

I have seen a lot of companies. Many of them fell short of my expectations. About 8 out of 10. I think we need to regulate their activities.
Must be an external regulator. As well as conscience and morality. The project team should strive for this. Trust is the success of the project.

yes right, it can be seen that the ICO failure managed by the company only appeared but was not appropriate and could not make investors believe anymore, so according to the wishes of many parties to be more deeply managed for it so that all could walk again not just a few months the coins could take place year so this is more like the power of cryptocurrency actually and there must be a price balance.

[Joshapat]

Of course this is a good idea, the presence of regulations is needed to make investor confidence improve, this year is the worst at the ICO because of the many scam projects, and I hope that strict regulations will be made for the ICO soon.

[owlman]

Some regulations is not so bad and it is protection for investors. But maybe regulation break the main idea of all cryptocurrency sphere - decentralization. Crypto enthusiast still say that they wont to be in legal sphere but want decentralized structure.

You are right, regulation of the market for ICO projects may have its own advantages and disadvantages. In any case, there will always be people who are not satisfied with something or vice versa, but personally I will be curious to see how events will develop in the future, and whether the ICO market will really be regulated.

[Aryleeto]

ICO regulation in certain framework will give the result. for example even verification of the developers will decrease the chance of scam.

I agree I think you need to invest in the project, of course you need to first look at the team and if they have been indefikatsii it is a much higher chance that the project will be successful

[sekop]

The rules for ICO, it is very important for the hopes of ICO success in the future. The more the rules are good and can be implemented with discipline, the ICO will run more smoothly and it will be easier for ICO to achieve its objectives. The absence of rules applied to an ICO will create a considerable vulnerability for ICO to fail. Because the ICO does not have a guideline and the participants along with the working team cannot perform their duties in a disciplined manner.

[betece777]

if it is true then it is possible that the country that wants to interfere in ico certainly sees this enormous opportunity.
positively, in my opinion, with the existence of a country that will attract many investors and also reduce the risk or scam, this will increase investor confidence. .
the negative in my opinion is that maybe the governing country will ask for profit and also the appearance of investors with small capital.
whatever the results, in my opinion, this is a good progress and there will be a firm support for this.