Is ICO regulation good or bad?

[goodday886]

in my opinion. Encryption does not require supervision. it violates the spirit of encryption. although ICO has some problems. but it is not a good way to restrict it with government regulation. the market will fix it.

[tomboi]

I think the ICO rules are very good because many ICO and ICO scams fail. This regulation was made to protect ICO, Investors and all ICO participants. And if this regulation is made it will definitely help everyone and increase trust in the ICO and many good ICOs.

[MarconyGL]

in my opinion. Encryption does not require supervision. it violates the spirit of encryption. although ICO has some problems. but it is not a good way to restrict it with government regulation. the market will fix it.

How do you think the market can fix these problems? ICO will continue to have all the same problems that are now, and they are far from trifling and until they are eliminated, the sphere of ICO investment will gradually fade away

[ceetoo224]

More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?

I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.

Whenever there are regulation that is being said, It comes to my mind that regulations will just going to make the crypto space in good shape, we can now prevent such bad ICOS but in reality, it is very complicated.

[agusiska]

i think regulating is good option to minimize the chance of fake and scam ico out there, many fake ico has success cheated the investor because nobody control it.

[EastSound]

yes, That way it will kill the ICO industry because right now most of ICO's are scam and they really dont care about using the blockchain technology. Only a handful of these ICO projects survives

[makerst]

It is difficult for me to draw conclusions today, because today there is such a direction as STO, which seems to be already regulated as STO fully complies with the documents regulated by the SEC, so I think that in general it already exists.

[Lexurdania]

There will always be pros and cons.
We will see less ICO scams and less people will lose money and fill scammers wallets.
On the other hand regulation of ICO will bring us, well, regulation, more taxes, centralization etc.

I am agree, every decision there is always be pros and cons. But i am agree if ICOs regulated by government because last year, many ICOs scam and it reducing investor trust on this market.

[killat]

Of course this will be a good thing for entire crypto industry.

Image of crypto was affected badly by a lot of scam ICO being raised mainly in 2018. Regulations of ICOs would be beneficial first for Ico-based projects,  that would keep one chance to get money through ICO.

[ivannalog814]

I think that the regulation of ICO is the first step to the recognition of cryptocurrency as a means of payment. I believe that the investor should be protected as any user for example as Visa or MasterCard users.

[NY-city]

It is difficult for me to draw conclusions today, because today there is such a direction as STO, which seems to be already regulated as STO fully complies with the documents regulated by the SEC, so I think that in general it already exists.

The number of scammers has not decreased, I also did not notice a favorable impact on the crypto currency, radical measures are needed, so that even scammers do not have a desire to meddle in this area, so that they understand that they will not work out

[Xising]

More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?

I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.

For me, I would say it's good mate. To regulate may be daunting because it can impose more requirements and burden to its users; however, on the other hand, that very same act is a means to amp up the protection that a person who ventures in ICO may get. If it's regulated, then it would add more security, which in turn, may invigorate the ICO market. I mean, these days, many have already shifted their means of business to other department of the cryptocurrency market because the ICO market is one of those markets that have been susceptible to so many losses and even scams, so it's trust rating is at an all time low.

[pelumi20]

I think regulating ICOs is a necessity in this present cryptocurrency space because of the increase rate of fraudulent activities with ICOs. Statistics shows that over 80% of the ICOs that launched in 2018 were scam, this calls for a drastic change. I think ICOs regulation will curb this fraudulent activities and give ICOs a trusted sign and make it safer for businesses and investors.

[likit123]

You are absolutely right in everything: that the ICO needs to be regulated, and that there are positive and negative aspects of regulation. The positive side is that investors will be protected and their risks will be minimized. Also, the cryptosphere can develop at the expense of the state, and not just private investors. The negative side - restrictions in favor of the state, and this is very undesirable.

[Cemploon]

I think the arrangement for ICO is very good because this will make investor confidence stronger. There are many ICO frauds because they are carried out by irresponsible people. And if the ICO is regulated, of course, they will not dare to commit fraud and investors will feel safe.

[Levyathan]

Yes, it is very good and its  a great thing to see the regulation to prevent money laundering from the scammers and most of the scumbag.

[jessyj48]

Who would dare say ICO regulation is bad? Regulation is what ICO actually needs the most ,without it ICO will still face hard time in the future and STO will be the only total option left ,regulation is the only way to revive ICO

[Mila52]

Of course, for investors to make a profit and protect their investments is the main task. But the idea and the principle of decentralization will then be violated. Perhaps, insurance of contributions to the ICO this is exit for investors ?

[LUCKMCFLY]

It is the best and most necessary, especially for investors to continue believing in technology. It is also positive because financial frauds will cease, besides, I understand that the regulations for ICOs are very demanding, they request a lot of documentation and everything must be under the law.

They will also monitor them, they will have a clear study of the entire team that makes up the ICO, I think that they will study if possible, the funds they collect will enforce what they promised, if not, they can have serious sanctions.

[high110]

ICO regulation is necessary. Due to the lack of regulation in 2017-2018, there were a lot of scammers in the ICO market. People stopped investing their money in projects. Now on Binance are held ICO. Investors go there. The future is with sites like Launchpad Binance.