Is ICO regulation good or bad?

[yobo2020]

Regulations of ICO will be good to a certain level in order to curtail scam project and this will allow investors to invest huge amount in ICO but will limit the chance of investors will small money to invest.

[1715135359]

1715135359

[1715135359]

1715135359

[1715135359]

1715135359

[Apes]

the regulations that made by some countries to limit ICO funding aim to reduce fraud crimes or reduce the flow of funds from out of the country. because funds come out of the country without providing income which means it will damage the country's economy. obviously ICO funding must indeed be limited. this seems to be limiting but by the state also wants to protect assets and its citizens.

[QNaka]

If regulation is carried out out of good intentions, and the project develops and benefits all participants and the economy of the country, then this is correct and promising. That will also help to more effectively deal with fraud.

[CryptoKush]

I think that  regulation is not very good. Regulation creates many obstacles for small investors. Cryptocurrencies are designed to be free and easily accessible. Therefore, I think that regulation is bad.

[Bim abk]

I think that  regulation is not very good. Regulation creates many obstacles for small investors. Cryptocurrencies are designed to be free and easily accessible. Therefore, I think that regulation is bad.

yes regulation may be contrary to crypto properties because there will be a body that controls it. and I think if regulations are held to raise the standards of a project that wants to introduce their platform, then I agree to this

[arwani1985]

That's pretty good, especially investors and bounty participants feel safe when there is a rule for ico if they want to fund using ico. this is very important to avoid fraud and also things that can harm many people

[Coroline]

More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?

I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.

in my opinion it is good because every time the ico project offered is getting more intense, but there are too many fake ico at the moment and it is difficult to distinguish, they plan neatly, the price problem is not problematic if appropriate

[Felipeo]

I think at this moment ico ecosystem really need some regulations. Cause this ecosystem is destroying itself day by day for the one reason scam and failed projects. In last few months we saw many projects who collected money form general people and investors and then simply disappeared. And some of them successful during ico but when it comes to development they just failed. Some of them never listed their token anywhere. So people are getting this kind of problem day by day. I think only regulations can stop this things.

[odukoyaewatomi27]

ICOs regulations is indeed a very good move in the crypto space because of the increased rate of ICOs scam, which is giving the whole crypto market a negative trust amongst investors. If ICOs get regulated, it will reduce the scam rates and therefore bring in more investors into the market.

[daporivera]

ICO regulation right now is desperately needed as there are a lot of scammers put there, polluting the crypto world and making it seem to investors as not dim fit for investment.
The rate of scam is too high as day by day several scam projects are being launched.

[fianaindriati]

I think the rules on ICO are very good. because basically the market needs rules. so that not all of them act as they wish, and sometimes many use the ICO freely, so sometimes there are those who use ICO incorrectly

[WalkerIVIV]

If regulation is carried out out of good intentions, and the project develops and benefits all participants and the economy of the country, then this is correct and promising. That will also help to more effectively deal with fraud.

KYC verification should be applied to the creator of ico and that must become an optional choice for the bounty hunters to complete the KYC verification but the opposite thing was happening. we need verification to avoid the fraud dude.

[Skroojee]

I think that ICO regulation is a necessary measure regardless of whether it is bad or good, since too many people become victims of scams.

[lovesybitz]

More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?

I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.

For me it doesn't matter if the ico is decentralized or not, just important is they can give both help to anyone here in this of business.
And besides in some angle there is a positive way if the ico will become regulated, like it can give help to increase the economy of each country for sure in the near future.

[mrdeposit]

That's pretty good, especially investors and bounty participants feel safe when there is a rule for ico if they want to fund using ico. this is very important to avoid fraud and also things that can harm many people

It is not that easy to achieve. Although most of this is written, no one appears when the implementation time comes. If there is mutual respect, they can get more. But, most projects see themselves as unchangeable.

[kemetz]

I think that ICO regulation is a necessary measure regardless of whether it is bad or good, since too many people become victims of scams.

yes right because with the regulation on the ICO going forward there will be no more scam projects that are scattered and only harm the victims.

so there's no need to worry anymore if there are regulations on ICO for investors to invest in their projects and that will also have a positive impact on the market situation.

[tonibyuzen]

I believe that the regulation of ICO carries more advantages, since finally we will be able to clear the market from scams. When only professional teams and professional investors remain on the ICO market, the projects will have real value and significance, competition will increase and their development will accelerate.

[Ranly123]

More and more countries are planning to regulate ICOs. China, Canada, Russia,... I think this in an development nobody can stop. Do you think it is good or bad that ICOs will be more regulated in the near future? What positive and negative influences will it probably have?

I think there will be more investors like professional managed funds or even retirement funds which will invest into ICOs. The prices for ICOs will then become even more expensive and make it more difficult to make profits for small investors.

If this will progress, I think it would be better to be regulated rather than letting those scams spread all over crypto most especially ICO.

[shooleh]

If Crypto is regulated by the government, of course, there will be good and bad effects. I think the government's entry into Crypto will make ICO opportunities grow. And trust for investors will also grow. In addition, security will be very guarded and fraudsters will be punished.

[der_troll]

It is a pretty difficult question because on the one hand crypto currencies were created for anonymity and the lack of the third party and such actions will not support these core factors, but on the other hand there are too much scam projects on the market and we need to find a way of how to protect investors from them.