------------------------------------------------------------------
We would like to offer the following way to vote:
0. all votes are made in Contest thread and are public;
1. each of you selects 3 best work (9 selected);
2. each of you selects 2 work out of 9 (6 selected);
3. now each Judge vote for each work, votes calculated and the work with least votes is out. Repeat untill 3 remains.
4. we will give the final time, when decision should be made. If by this time Judges will not come to decision, than our team will select the winner. We will start where Judges have stopped: we will select from those works Judges already selected.
Any objections?
------------------------------------------------------------------
We would like to end the contest on 13 September, so we would like Judges to consider if they will be available on that date?
We will give some guidliness to contestant what we would like to have, but it is Judges sole discretion which work to select. We will not interfere in process.
Judges can disqualify any contestant for insults. Can be decided by only 1 Judge and is obligatory for everybody, even for us!. We expect Judges will use this right carefully.
Judges have right to discuss works privatly, but voting should be public.
We expect honesty from Judges. We think it is fair, if Judges will disqualify those offering bribes in PM. We think it is fair that Judges should not offer their works under other nicknames. Though after we selected Judges we do not have control on that.
Judges will be paid for their job even after paragraph 4, but we expect Judges will do everything for this not to hapen.
Any other suggestions?
------------------------------------------------------------------
We were thinking of smartcontracts on Ethereum. But probably this is not the best idea after all.
Escrow will be better: any recommendations or offers?