[ANN] ICObench - ICO rating platform and community +Mobile App +API +Widgets

[jumbo]

Hello,

Thank you for bringing our attention to these people, we will look into them and act accordingly. We really appreciate the help of community, so if you have any proof of an expert selling ratings for money or exchanging for their services, please send it to info@icobench.com

You are welcome.

Also, this guys look very suspicious:

https://icobench.com/u/ny

He recently rated a lot of projects, many of which have ended months ago (like Binance, Friendz and many others, which he rated today or yesterday). None of his ratings contain any valuable information.

Probably, he is just boosting his rating to get more weight. It is certainly an abuse of your system and is bad both for the platform and the trust. You shall change that system to avoid this kind of cheaters.

About the email: I can copy all that to your email, but that is crucial to keep such information public, not just between us. It is better for everyone, if development and changes on your platform would by transparent.

[1715390553]

1715390553

[1715390553]

1715390553

[1715390553]

1715390553

[1715390553]

1715390553

[ICObench]

• From now on the projects can publish their MVPs and prototypes and the users can filter ICOs by the availability of the product. Please send links to GitHub and other sources to info@icobench.com
• Even though ICObench experts rate ICOs voluntarily we expect them to be active members of the community. That's why we have decided to revoke the status of those who’ve been inactive for over 3 months
• No more double passing KYC! If you passed KYC as part of ICO team, contact us to verify your user profile. And vice versa: if you are a core team member and have verified profile we can change your status in the ICO.

[gozcominer]

An excellent prospective project that has a huge potential market and will allow investors to receive passive income. Good luck for the in this greatest project.

[remedcu]

ICObench Experts: New rules for a better community

https://medium.com/@ICObench/icobench-experts-new-rules-for-a-better-community-d289903714dc

[jumbo]

ICObench Experts: New rules for a better community

https://medium.com/@ICObench/icobench-experts-new-rules-for-a-better-community-d289903714dc

Great news, I'm happy to see that needed developments to ICOBench. I hope, that they are not going to stop there, since the regulatory background and the market will keep challenging the ICO industry itself and the ICOBench as it's most renowned proxy.

Currently, the changes mentioned do not look like a final solution for the rates quality problem and the experts' corruption risks, but it is definitely a step in the right direction.

[michietn94]

An excellent prospective project that has a huge potential market and will allow investors to receive passive income. Good luck for the in this greatest project.

Agree with you. Generally ICO ranking websites only include details and information about an ICO project but in ICOBENCH, we can also to earn additional income by selling service capabilities that we have. An advantage that I do not think exists on other websites.

[btcrich2020]

ICObench Experts: New rules for a better community

https://medium.com/@ICObench/icobench-experts-new-rules-for-a-better-community-d289903714dc

Yes, ICObench is taking lot of measures in order to control the fake ICO's and it is good way to attract the investors by investing into good projects. Review should not be based on money but with the real time efforts of the company and their team.

[Kosmog]

How much time it takes to review an expert application ? I submitted mine around 1.5 months ago.  ( Grigore Ion-Cosmin )

Thank you and sorry for intruding

[finist4x]

Glad to join the movement ICObench!  An excellent tool for investors and projects.


 

[andrearz]

Update:

We have started with implementation of ISS (ICO Success Score).
For example, You can see a graph of such score on https://icobench.com/u/michael-gord
Or you can also notice green icon under "team" of an ICO.

This is currently only initial stage of scoring which will of course get improved over time.
Having people with high ISS in the ICO team improves their overall team score.

wow, I think this is an important thing to note because with the ISS in accordance with what you explain then later things like this will make it easier for investors to choose ICO quality. I hope with there ISS investors will have more confidence in the ICO is widely circulated at this time.

[Thadeous]

Guys, I think we need your comments on this article on Medium: Beware of ICO Bench!

[outta]

Guys, I think we need your comments on this article on Medium: Beware of ICO Bench!

In my humble opinion, the platform can't be held responsible for experts' frauds and if some packages are overpriced or useless, why even talk about it, just don't use them.
Honestly, I believe one could complain about false ratings by greedy experts or one can be thankful, that such a platform exists. I haven't seen a platform with higher reputation and with experienced and well-known experts (not all, of course).

Though I like constructive critics, the points in the article, in my opinion, are not fair and sometimes even silly:
 If a beautiful jewelry costs a lot, you don't call it a fraud.
Sometimes even advisors don't know if an ICO is going to be a scam. Having only a website, a whitepaper and some photos of the team, you can't make any arguments about the validity of an ICO and the plans of its creators.

Instead of complaining one could build something better and then make a comparison.
By sitting on the sofa and calling names one can't make any impact.

I have no connection to the platform, these are just my opinions  .

[finist4x]

I am grateful to the team of ICObench for a prompt solution to a contentious issue related to my reputation.

[ICObench]

It’s back! We have fully rebuilt and revamped our Crypto Assets page. Browse through tokens and crypto exchanges, learn more about asset’s ROI and current price at https://icobench.com/cryptoassets

[ICObench]

Hello,

The thing is that the author got angry at us for declining his application for expert. After that the reasons we provided didn't satisfy him so he keeps harassing our support with senseless emails and now wrote this piece where no single word is true. It's just a classic case of 'sour grapes', please don't believe anything that doesn't have any basis for it and do your own fact checking and research.
Thank you.

Guys, I think we need your comments on this article on Medium: Beware of ICO Bench!

[remedcu]

declining his application for expert. After that the reasons we provided didn't satisfy him

This is what attracted my eye. So, you are indeed checking on the applications. But really slow I guess. Anyways, hope that clog would be cleared soon.

[Thadeous]

Hello,

The thing is that the author got angry at us for declining his application for expert. After that the reasons we provided didn't satisfy him so he keeps harassing our support with senseless emails and now wrote this piece where no single word is true. It's just a classic case of 'sour grapes', please don't believe anything that doesn't have any basis for it and do your own fact checking and research.
Thank you.

Guys, I think we need your comments on this article on Medium: Beware of ICO Bench!

Do you mean he posted all this on Medium only because wasn't hired by your company?

[ICObench]

According to our FAQ: An ICObench expert is an active member of ICObench community that has the right to rate ICOs and conforms to the rules of the experts community. Although the contribution of every expert is valuable, they are not a part of ICObench team, so ICObench is not responsible for their ratings and cannot remove or change them if they comply with the rules of the community.

So we just declined his expert status which we have right to do without giving a specific reason, and such answer didn't satisfy him so you see the result.

Hello,

The thing is that the author got angry at us for declining his application for expert. After that the reasons we provided didn't satisfy him so he keeps harassing our support with senseless emails and now wrote this piece where no single word is true. It's just a classic case of 'sour grapes', please don't believe anything that doesn't have any basis for it and do your own fact checking and research.
Thank you.

Guys, I think we need your comments on this article on Medium: Beware of ICO Bench!

Do you mean he posted all this on Medium only because wasn't hired by your company?

[ico-fanatic]

Hello,

The thing is that the author got angry at us for declining his application for expert. After that the reasons we provided didn't satisfy him so he keeps harassing our support with senseless emails and now wrote this piece where no single word is true. It's just a classic case of 'sour grapes', please don't believe anything that doesn't have any basis for it and do your own fact checking and research.
Thank you.

Guys, I think we need your comments on this article on Medium: Beware of ICO Bench!

I looks like you are lying ICO Bench!

Instead of replying to those claims you are moving attention from the real issue to the person. This does not raise your credibility you are making an argumental mistake known as ”Ad hominem”.

It may be true that his application was denied, but that explains the motive only, not that he is lying.

So is it true what he says or not? If not, what is your response?

And don't give a short reply yes/no. Address every point in that article and tell us, what is your stand on the issues and what are you making to make sure that it will not happen.

[ICObench]

We do not move the attention to this person but telling our view of the story, facts only. Instead of accusing us of the lies you could just do the fact checking of his words, as even a shallow analysis of our site and social pages will show you that all of the statements in this post are blatant lies (more that he actually keeps deleting comments to his Medium post those say it and bring the opposite things about all the points) so there are no issues to address. We don't say that our rating system is perfect, but we work on it every day and such accusations only steal our time from making actually useful features for the site and the community.
And yes, as we told in previous post, no single word in that Medium post is true.

Hello,

The thing is that the author got angry at us for declining his application for expert. After that the reasons we provided didn't satisfy him so he keeps harassing our support with senseless emails and now wrote this piece where no single word is true. It's just a classic case of 'sour grapes', please don't believe anything that doesn't have any basis for it and do your own fact checking and research.
Thank you.

Guys, I think we need your comments on this article on Medium: Beware of ICO Bench!

I looks like you are lying ICO Bench!

Instead of replying to those claims you are moving attention from the real issue to the person. This does not raise your credibility you are making an argumental mistake known as ”Ad hominem”.

It may be true that his application was denied, but that explains the motive only, not that he is lying.

So is it true what he says or not? If not, what is your response?

And don't give a short reply yes/no. Address every point in that article and tell us, what is your stand on the issues and what are you making to make sure that it will not happen.