[ANN][SEM] Semux - Official Thread

[julia220]

0xe8e761aB3ce134d215c9Bd1Bb68fc41Eb58b0e4c

[BTcoint]

0xe8e761aB3ce134d215c9Bd1Bb68fc41Eb58b0e4c

what is this ? address not allowed to be posted in public thread and may lead to lock  Semux ANN.....

[technerd]

this project needs a good documentation on official website. Took me ages to figure how and why to vote, that there are pools out there and things like that

plus romanian version is a miserable google translate version

should i remove my votes before mainnet launch?

Can you point me to the link on this? I am not sure where to find it either.  Thanks.

[monsanto]

As a question for how pools 'should' run.  I have 2 validators.  Right now each pay out separately, so votes for one are 1/44k share and other is 1/40k share.
I am playing around with allow configuration to treat them just as one big pool.  So everyone gets 1/84k share of  2x the reward.

At the moment, it doesn't matter, but if i were to start say 'pool3' (I'm not), I want to encourage votes for it, so it would make sense to allow those voters to still receive a share, even though its not forging yet.

Downside is, if I open up a new pool, those who already have votes on a 'full' one have no incentive to balance their votes to the lower one.  And balancing votes is a good thing.

Thoughts?  Pros and cons to each.. just not sure what makes most sense.

At first glance it looks like having the pools payout separately provides a nice incentive to balance out the votes. Pool operators with large SEM reserves will presumably also have a lot easier time optimizing their validator vote counts for the maximum payout/vote ratio by topping of their validator vote counts with their own SEM.

Something that just occurred to me is I wonder if pools with multiple validators could attack each other by pulling votes. Imagine if a competing pool, run by a SEM whale, saw you starting pool3, they could then take some of their reserve SEM and use it to fill up a large portion of your pool3 vote capacity.  Then at the most opportune time for them (maybe when they have enough votes to make another validator) they pull their votes from pool3 making it lose its validator status and lowering your payout across all 3 pools (if your treating them as one big pool). Probably not a realistic scenario lol.. just trying to imagine crazy things that might happen.

[mdodong]

As a question for how pools 'should' run.  I have 2 validators.  Right now each pay out separately, so votes for one are 1/44k share and other is 1/40k share.
I am playing around with allow configuration to treat them just as one big pool.  So everyone gets 1/84k share of  2x the reward.

At the moment, it doesn't matter, but if i were to start say 'pool3' (I'm not), I want to encourage votes for it, so it would make sense to allow those voters to still receive a share, even though its not forging yet.

Downside is, if I open up a new pool, those who already have votes on a 'full' one have no incentive to balance their votes to the lower one.  And balancing votes is a good thing.

Thoughts?  Pros and cons to each.. just not sure what makes most sense.

At first glance it looks like having the pools payout separately provides a nice incentive to balance out the votes. Pool operators with large SEM reserves will presumably also have a lot easier time optimizing their validator vote counts for the maximum payout/vote ratio by topping of their validator vote counts with their own SEM.

Something that just occurred to me is I wonder if pools with multiple validators could attack each other by pulling votes. Imagine if a competing pool, run by a SEM whale, saw you starting pool3, they could then take some of their reserve SEM and use it to fill up a large portion of your pool3 vote capacity.  Then at the most opportune time for them (maybe when they have enough votes to make another validator) they pull their votes from pool3 making it lose its validator status and lowering your payout across all 3 pools (if your treating them as one big pool). Probably not a realistic scenario lol.. just trying to imagine crazy things that might happen.

That's always a possibility. However it would also be dangerous for someone to play with the vote count as their own validator might be voted out of the top 100. We will see how this would play out as we roll out the mainnet and get more adoption.

[Techmozz]

I wanted to see and know the rating of your ICO. I can't found your ICO on ICOVoting.com. Users wanted to know a full and reliable rating about you.

   ICOVOTING       [ All review and ICO in one place ]       ICOVOTING      
 Website | User guide | Telegram

No usual ICO.

[Messier81]

I wanted to see and know the rating of your ICO. I can't found your ICO on ICOVoting.com. Users wanted to know a full and reliable rating about you.

   ICOVOTING       [ All review and ICO in one place ]       ICOVOTING      
 Website | User guide | Telegram

No usual ICO.

No ANY ICO - there was no ICO.

[Phash2k]

no ICO - just a small community project with great ideas...

[Raline]

Waw 20 semux equivalent to 1 BTC it's a very fantastic price I think semux has a coin that deserves to be calculated because its airdrop alone is able to give the price of 20 semux equivalent to 1BTC

[somac.]

Does anyone know how much semux per day a delegate/validator is expected to earn?

[lda1000]

Does anyone know how much semux per day a delegate/validator is expected to earn?

Validator daily average:
28.8 * 3 SEM = 86.4 SEM

Delegate daily average:
0 SEM

[wiredideas]

Waw 20 semux equivalent to 1 BTC it's a very fantastic price I think semux has a coin that deserves to be calculated because its airdrop alone is able to give the price of 20 semux equivalent to 1BTC

We will beat BTC in the future, we have all the features to topple the old king.

[Provok]

Joined sig camp.

3. All coins you minted/received during the test will be transferred to our main test 1:1 when we officially launch, which is expected in early 2018;

4. After the test, the chain data will be dropped and all balances (plus delegate registration refund) shall be carried over;

What's it mean? After test will be another test with balance transfer, an after this test all balances will be dropped? But people already buy and sell sem for BTC!

[wiredideas]

semuxpool_com and semuxpool_com2 update:
payouts for last ~24 hours went out.

Bug in validator code caused semuxpool_com2 to pay out 2 times (until it ran out of SEM).  Working on fix now

There were only a few addresses that did not meet minimum payout for the day, most voters were paid out.

I have 1 vote each for two pool
look like my votes too less no rewards 

Yes 1 vote won't cut it, you need to vote maybe 100 or more to make it more worth while.

[wiredideas]

Joined sig camp.

3. All coins you minted/received during the test will be transferred to our main test 1:1 when we officially launch, which is expected in early 2018;

4. After the test, the chain data will be dropped and all balances (plus delegate registration refund) shall be carried over;

What's it mean? After test will be another test with balance transfer, an after this test all balances will be dropped? But people already buy and sell sem for BTC!

From what I understand this is the last RC version, after this in January 20 mainnet will go live and all balances from the previous RC Test net will be carried over to the mainnet. That means if you have 1000 semux in your wallet in RC5 Test Net when the mainnet goes live you will retain that 1000 semux of yours. Dev will make a snapshot of semux network before migrating to the mainnet thus every balances will be carried over to mainnet.

[ccoldfire]

Hi,am getting the "This BTC address is not on our list!" message,am i eligible to the airdrop?Thank!.

[baobao2000]

I am newbie in bicointalk，
Is anyway to join SEM airdrop?

[pirangueiro]

I am newbie in bicointalk，
Is anyway to join SEM airdrop?

yes, join the signature campain from page 1.

[joyteq]

Bug in validator code caused semuxpool_com2 to pay out 2 times (until it ran out of SEM).

Oops.  Maybe you should have named it semuxpool_com2x since it pays out twice.  :-)

Out of curiosity, in the blocks forged by you so far, how much transaction fees have you earned over the general block reward?

[Javi_Anibarro]

Hi,am getting the "This BTC address is not on our list!" message,am i eligible to the airdrop?Thank!.

if you met the requirement,
nothing to worry about actually,but if you did not meet it.
i am afraid you will be excluded from the airdrop.
please read this :

2. We’ve taken a snapshot of the bitcoin chain at block #480,000. You need to have at least 0.05 BTC balance to be eligible for this event. Your can check your balance at https://www.semux.org/btc/ ;
3. You need to sign your Semux address with your Bitcoin wallet and submit the signature to https://goo.gl/forms/tXh3Gd8Z6LddBw6H2;

how about it ?