Not sure how reliable your campaign managers' decision on selecting the participant. I checked most of the accepted participants and I can see that most of them are posters on basically all the spam thread or low quality thread which you can see on the bitcoin discussion and gambling discussion. All their post are general spam which are mostly just recycled post and sentences that were rephrased to make it look like a constructive post but if you look in it, it's actually not.
The length of post des not mean it's High quality. Post in bitcoin discussion or economics does not mean that their posts are constructive.
Please provide some examples.
I will gladly audit my campaign manager.
All decisions are objective and transparent.
Kind regards,
O.
Sent you a list of example. I didn't want to post it in here since it will ruin the thread but if you want me to post it, just let me know.
I saw your list. You sir are an idiot of the highest order. I feel
sorry for you. Are you not on Lauda's SMAS list? Keep me out of your shenanigans. Thanks for the opportunity campaign manager.
