Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2016, 12:05:53 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Beta?  (Read 3660 times)
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
June 26, 2010, 05:02:43 PM
 #1

Is it about time we lose the Beta?  I would make this release version 1.3.
1475323553
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475323553

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475323553
Reply with quote  #2

1475323553
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
virtualcoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
June 26, 2010, 11:04:01 PM
 #2

I'm not sure, but I think it's unusual to jump from version 0.3 to 1.3. ^^ Maybe 1.0?
But on the other hand: who cares?
NewLibertyStandard
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2010, 01:10:42 AM
 #3

My vote is for 1.0. It'll probably help us get slashdotted.

Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
lachesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
June 27, 2010, 01:33:31 AM
 #4

+1 NLS. Version 1.0 sounds better than 1.3.

Bitcoin Calculator | Scallion | GPG Key | WoT Rating | 1QGacAtYA7E8V3BAiM7sgvLg7PZHk5WnYc
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
June 27, 2010, 12:43:50 PM
 #5

But 1.0 sounds like the first release.  For some things newness is a virtue but for this type of software, maturity and stability are important.  I don't want to put my money in something that's 1.0.  1.0 might be more interesting for a moment, but after that we're still 1.0 and everyone who comes along thinks we just started.  This is the third major release and 1.3 reflects that development history.  (0.1, 0.2, 1.3)
lachesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
June 27, 2010, 01:47:18 PM
 #6

True, and it is your project. 1.3 it is!

Bitcoin Calculator | Scallion | GPG Key | WoT Rating | 1QGacAtYA7E8V3BAiM7sgvLg7PZHk5WnYc
NewLibertyStandard
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2010, 08:36:42 AM
 #7

Quote from: Wikipedia
Proprietary software developers often start at version 1 for the first release of a program and increment the major version number with each rewrite. This can mean that a program can reach version 3 within a few months of development, before it is considered stable or reliable.

In contrast to this, the free-software community tends to use version 1.0 as a major milestone, indicating that the software is "complete", that it has all major features, and is considered reliable enough for general release.
Quote Source

The above description is how I and most geeks view version 1.0 software. Slashdot readers and editors will understand that 1.0 means that we're ready for business. Getting on Slashdot is the best advertising opportunity we'll probably get for a very long time, so to willfully pass it up seems unwise to me.

Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
D҉ataWraith
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 60



View Profile
June 28, 2010, 12:17:51 PM
 #8

I agree with lachesis and NLS. Version 1.0 is better for publicity, and is commonly taken to mean "we're out of beta now, but don't expect everything to be perfect."

1NvcPV6xi6yqo5yg8aWSkNdasPSAsGtt1m
teppy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


View Profile
June 28, 2010, 06:38:46 PM
 #9

I agree as well - "version 1.0" is ready-made for Slashdot.

Dragon's Tale is the longest running Bitcoin enterprise in the world.
Bitcoiner
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 28, 2010, 07:20:13 PM
 #10

1.0 is a nice version number to get started off with, and indicates that the software is ready for prime time. A jump from 0.2 to 1.3 would be a little strange.

Want to thank me for this post? Donate here! Flip your coins over to: 13Cq8AmdrqewatRxEyU2xNuMvegbaLCvEe  Smiley
The Madhatter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


My avatar pic says it all


View Profile
June 28, 2010, 09:07:15 PM
 #11

I also agree with v1.0 for the same reasons posted above. Publicity would also be nice. Wink
dkaparis
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53


View Profile
June 29, 2010, 12:36:58 AM
 #12

FWIW I'd vote for 1.0 too.

As NLS and D҉ataWraith have pointed, there are certain perceptions associated with a 1.0 release and they are mostly reasonable. Trying to cheat these perceptions in such way is unwise in my opinion. Much better to release 1.0 now and do another minor release or two shortly afterwards.
Bitcoiner
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 30, 2010, 12:04:49 AM
 #13

FWIW I'd vote for 1.0 too.

As NLS and D҉ataWraith have pointed, there are certain perceptions associated with a 1.0 release and they are mostly reasonable. Trying to cheat these perceptions in such way is unwise in my opinion. Much better to release 1.0 now and do another minor release or two shortly afterwards.


And if not 1.0, there's nothing wrong with 0.3. Tor is only at 0.2 and is a popular anonymity network. It's all about networking and how you present the application. Tor has user-friendly client software and a user-friendly website. Is Bitcoin really even 1.0 software? I would argue that it is still missing a lot of polish and features. 0.3 is fine; just improve the marketing, the user-friendliness and look & feel of the website, and usage will keep increasing.

Want to thank me for this post? Donate here! Flip your coins over to: 13Cq8AmdrqewatRxEyU2xNuMvegbaLCvEe  Smiley
Xunie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132



View Profile
June 30, 2010, 01:37:07 AM
 #14

I vote for "1.0" and not "1.3" or something, bleh!
(I also advice we use a major, minor and patch level version number, "0.0.00".)
I've used bitcoin-1.3.0.rc3-linux[1] and found it to be mature enough to be called "1.0" in my opinion.
(It was already called 1.3 there, but I guess we cal all agree it's the next release, thus right now can be called both 1.3 and 0.3.)

[1] http://www.bitcoin.org/download/bitcoin-1.3.0.rc3-linux.tar.gz

Thank me for this post here: 1PyNKEyqtDFB4HBG8ueDVxdPZfgwC6gAqw
Caffeinism -- a toxic condition caused by excessive ingestion of coffee and other caffeine-containing beverage.
NewLibertyStandard
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile WWW
June 30, 2010, 02:16:29 AM
 #15

I think version 0.3 would be a better choice if Bitcoin wasn't making financial transactions on Windows. A significant number of people, particularly Windows users, don't trust software below version 1.1 or 1.2, but going from version 0.2 to 1.3 will backfire when those users find out we skipped the first three 1.x versions.

Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
laszlo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199


View Profile
June 30, 2010, 02:45:27 AM
 #16

I'm not much of a marketing guy or anything but it makes sense to me to refer to software like this by the version in source control, like Bitcoin r82 or whatever.. maybe that's too geeky for some people.

BC: 157fRrqAKrDyGHr1Bx3yDxeMv8Rh45aUet
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
July 02, 2010, 10:03:41 PM
 #17

OK, back to 0.3 then.

Please download RC4 and check it over as soon as possible.  I'd like to release it soon.

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199.msg1927#msg1927

Other than the version number change, which included changes in readme.txt and setup.nsi, I reduced the maximum number of outbound connections from 15 to 8 so nodes that accept inbound don't get too many connections.  15 was a lot more than needed.  8 is still plenty for redundancy.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!