|
|
|
|
|
John Langut
|
 |
December 06, 2017, 12:37:56 PM
Last edit: December 06, 2017, 01:04:05 PM by John Langut |
|
I have sent a PM to the new bounty manager blockchaingo about the new signature campaign spreadsheet. If you look closely a lot of shares are unjustly accredited.
For example some users received shares before they even joined the campaign, for weeks they didn't post or in weeks they posted less than 20 messages.
And also the other way around. I didn't receive shares for a week in which I had over 20 posts. Fortunately that was swiftly corrected by the bounty manager a few days ago. So if you joined the campaign, better check your shares.
I have also seen a PlayKey signature participant who received shares for only posting Twitter shares in bounty threads. I don't remember who and it's not against the rules, but it's a bit questionable IMHO.
I hope the mistakes can be corrected in time otherwise it's an unfair distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
riyaz22
|
|
December 06, 2017, 12:42:31 PM |
|
Hello, there seems to be a mix-up somewhere from you guys or basically you people just decide to slash down Bounty payments by this so much wide margin.
From the whitepaper it is clearly stated that a total of 100m PKT tokens was created, with 60%(60m PKT tokens) going for public sale, 1.5%(1.5m PKT tokens) going for Bounties and the rest of the project also receiving a share from the total amount. If the 60m PKT tokens offered for sales were not exhausted and are burned, does that mean that also the tokens allocated to other projects were also burned.??
This does not match up to any valid for the heavy reduction.
Guys, before posting please read discussion that happened before. Again, unsold tokens are burned (already burned) FOR ALL SIDES according to shares from WP. There is no any plan to specially reduce bounty tokens - ALL parts of tokens are burned proportionally including team tokens, advisors tokens and so on. OK if that's the case then I have no objection now because reduction is done those token burned from all shares.I think you needs to make an announcement officially with playkey management here on this thread with detail you mentioned here.So that nobody object further now.With all token burning proofs. regards There is no need of an announcement, it was all stated in the smart contract...they get burned automatically. Again...learn how smart contracts work, because nobody owes you an explination. It seems you are the only one here who is not capable of understanding this basic thing. Yes I am the only one who do not understand,Do you have any problem with that???If you are not from management you needs do your own business.And if you are trying to explain something then you needs to learn how to talk with other first and which kind of language you needs to use.There are lots of cases where projects change their bounty amounts only.If we needs an explanation then why there is problem in your upper department??? |
|
|
|
|
|
Scheede
|
|
December 06, 2017, 01:00:34 PM |
|
Well, when it is the last day, I would have an question for the sake of transparency: User "OculusMan" and his translations (?) were added to the translation-spreadsheet during the last days and even while flying over his posts since October I could not find anything related to "Playkey". For ANN-translation: the column says "n/a" For Bounty: the link https://vk.com/doc2869615_449793297?hash=e77306f761b3903d05&dl=8831f622ab5e0a6549 indeed leads to a cyril translation - true, but the .docx doesn´t provide any proof of publication Plus: May you explain to all others why there have been 60 stakes for his the cyril-bounty-translation when all ANN-translations have been awarded with 40 stakes only? Don´t get me wrong, everybody has to earn fair payment for done work, and we all decided to work in the cryptosphere, where TRANSPARENCY is one of the core-values, so for the sake of transparency: Could you present any (public) information (f.e. the links for publication) of his "Campaign translation & moderation" as well as of his bounty-translation? |
|
|
|
|
coinmr
|
|
December 06, 2017, 02:04:05 PM |
|
I have sent a PM to the new bounty manager blockchaingo about the new signature campaign spreadsheet. If you look closely a lot of shares are unjustly accredited.
For example some users received shares before they even joined the campaign, for weeks they didn't post or in weeks they posted less than 20 messages.
And also the other way around. I didn't receive shares for a week in which I had over 20 posts. Fortunately that was swiftly corrected by the bounty manager a few days ago. So if you joined the campaign, better check your shares.
I have also seen a PlayKey signature participant who received shares for only posting Twitter shares in bounty threads. I don't remember who and it's not against the rules, but it's a bit questionable IMHO.
I hope the mistakes can be corrected in time otherwise it's an unfair distribution.
Please write about the mistakes you found here (with exact examples) and pm to bounty manager. Probably he will fix this too. |
|
|
|
|
blockchaingo
Member
 Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2017, 02:21:32 PM |
|
I have sent a PM to the new bounty manager blockchaingo about the new signature campaign spreadsheet. If you look closely a lot of shares are unjustly accredited.
For example some users received shares before they even joined the campaign, for weeks they didn't post or in weeks they posted less than 20 messages.
And also the other way around. I didn't receive shares for a week in which I had over 20 posts. Fortunately that was swiftly corrected by the bounty manager a few days ago. So if you joined the campaign, better check your shares.
I have also seen a PlayKey signature participant who received shares for only posting Twitter shares in bounty threads. I don't remember who and it's not against the rules, but it's a bit questionable IMHO.
I hope the mistakes can be corrected in time otherwise it's an unfair distribution.
Please write about the mistakes you found here (with exact examples) and pm to bounty manager. Probably he will fix this too. That's why we have several days to double check all tables. Thank you for your attention, have corrected those errors. |
|
|
|
|
blockchaingo
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2017, 02:40:07 PM
Last edit: December 06, 2017, 03:23:30 PM by blockchaingo |
|
Well, when it is the last day, I would have an question for the sake of transparency: User "OculusMan" and his translations (?) were added to the translation-spreadsheet during the last days and even while flying over his posts since October I could not find anything related to "Playkey". For ANN-translation: the column says "n/a" For Bounty: the link https://vk.com/doc2869615_449793297?hash=e77306f761b3903d05&dl=8831f622ab5e0a6549 indeed leads to a cyril translation - true, but the .docx doesn´t provide any proof of publication Plus: May you explain to all others why there have been 60 stakes for his the cyril-bounty-translation when all ANN-translations have been awarded with 40 stakes only? Don´t get me wrong, everybody has to earn fair payment for done work, and we all decided to work in the cryptosphere, where TRANSPARENCY is one of the core-values, so for the sake of transparency: Could you present any (public) information (f.e. the links for publication) of his "Campaign translation & moderation" as well as of his bounty-translation? Thank you for your question. 28/29 rows at spreadsheets are related to make translations & moderation of old bounty thread in Russian (it was decided to move with only english version later) and ANN-threads (OculusMan was #0 bounty manager before Spaceman). Also, these stakes were allocated to WP translations tables yesterday as this work is translation, so it's not correct to compare stakes with Moderation stakes. Pools for moderation and WP translation are defined as independent 50%/50% from total 20% for Translation+Moderation. |
|
|
|
|
blockchaingo
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2017, 03:17:40 PM
Last edit: December 06, 2017, 03:46:03 PM by blockchaingo |
|
Yes I am the only one who do not understand,Do you have any problem with that???If you are not from management you needs do your own business.And if you are trying to explain something then you needs to learn how to talk with other first and which kind of language you needs to use.There are lots of cases where projects change their bounty amounts only.If we needs an explanation then why there is problem in your upper department???
Dear riyaz22 Here you can check total supply of PKT: https://etherscan.io/token/0x2604fa406be957e542beb89e6754fcde6815e83fHere is distribution of all PKT between team/foundation/advisors/bounty pools: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x51dca89fb6a8ce0da29ffadbf0d79bbdff7579e94f00cbf3769999acee16eb4bAs you could see tokens distribution was made accordingly to WP and there is no any other tokens existing (and for bounty 298,399 PKT were allocated). |
|
|
|
|
|
Scheede
|
|
December 06, 2017, 03:41:16 PM |
|
Well, when it is the last day, I would have an question for the sake of transparency: User "OculusMan" and his translations (?) were added to the translation-spreadsheet during the last days and even while flying over his posts since October I could not find anything related to "Playkey". For ANN-translation: the column says "n/a" For Bounty: the link https://vk.com/doc2869615_449793297?hash=e77306f761b3903d05&dl=8831f622ab5e0a6549 indeed leads to a cyril translation - true, but the .docx doesn´t provide any proof of publication Plus: May you explain to all others why there have been 60 stakes for his the cyril-bounty-translation when all ANN-translations have been awarded with 40 stakes only? Don´t get me wrong, everybody has to earn fair payment for done work, and we all decided to work in the cryptosphere, where TRANSPARENCY is one of the core-values, so for the sake of transparency: Could you present any (public) information (f.e. the links for publication) of his "Campaign translation & moderation" as well as of his bounty-translation? Thank you for your question. 28/29 rows at spreadsheets are related to make translations & moderation of old bounty thread in Russian (it was decided to move with only english version later) and ANN-threads (OculusMan was #0 bounty manager before Spaceman). Also, these stakes were allocated to WP translations tables yesterday as this work is translation, so it's not correct to compare stakes with Moderation stakes. Pools for moderation and WP translation are defined as independent 50%/50% from total 20% for Translation+Moderation. Perfect, this is a clear & understandable answer. Once again: Many thanks for your professionalism (work-load & response-times)! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
chixka000
|
|
December 06, 2017, 05:22:26 PM |
|
Sir, my stakes are counted correctly, thank you for your professionalism and quick responses in this thread!
|
|
|
|
|
|
dwminer1
|
|
December 06, 2017, 05:46:40 PM |
|
Thats funny how some people "support" project and even dont know that ico and bounty campaign is over...
|
|
|
|
FearLiath
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2017, 06:14:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexdragon
|
|
December 06, 2017, 06:20:20 PM
Last edit: December 06, 2017, 06:34:08 PM by Alexdragon |
|
|
|
|
|
McNail
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 2
|
|
December 06, 2017, 06:22:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blockchaingo
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2017, 07:43:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
blockchaingo
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2017, 07:44:01 PM
Last edit: December 07, 2017, 12:41:33 PM by blockchaingo |
|
Dear bounty participants,
today is the last day to send your comments on stakes (please PM me).
From 7th December stakes updates are not allowed!Dear Playkey bounty participants!
Bounty campaign is over, thanks for your participation!
IMPORTANT: If you have any questions or requests to correct errors please pm me not later than Dec 6th.
After Dec 6th tables will be fixed and no more corrects will be implemented.
Tokens distribution information
- Bounty campaign tokens that will be distributed is 298 399 (= 1,5% of total issued tokens 19 893 267).
- Distribution of bounty campaign tokens will start not later than Dec 11th
- Tokens for articles ant videos will be distributed via independent pools (7,5% for articles and 7,5% for videos)
All spreadsheets are updated till the end of campaign: (please note, that these are the only one correct tables you should use):
|
|
|
|
|
Kripto.hr
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
Revolutionising Marketing and Loyalty
|
|
December 06, 2017, 11:31:30 PM |
|
Do we have distribution date?
|
|
|
|
|
