Which ICO was the WORST and the SHITTIEST in the history of crypto?

[asymmetricMustache]

We're creating the token that we will be distributing to people who invested in the shitty ICOs. Here is the info:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2174052.0

For the very first distribution we would like to pick absolutely the worst and the most shitty ICO in the history of crypto.

Which ICO was the worst?

my vote is for chronologic
it was very funny actually.. they sold a useless token that the only function is to generate more tokens with the passing of time. they created a self moderated thread here in the forum and deleted every message pointing their problems.
they had the ico without the contract of the token (you basically could send them eth and get nothing in return) and were able to raise over 6 million dollars.
some days after the ico they decided to actually develop the token but they made a mistake in the deploy, so they had to recreate it after the token was already being traded.
the most fun about all that was that their token is called DAY and after the need to redeploy the contract because of the mistake, they changed the old ticker to YESTERDAY and created a new DAY token  

of course, there have been worse ICOs than chronologic, but I believe that they were the one that raised more money within the shittiest

[1714792134]

1714792134

[1714792134]

1714792134

[ohhhhi]

Actually someone have done the same thing , just check shit coin, btw spend instead of doing a joke why not put some time into building a good project?

Yes, that's the coin that was an inspiration for the SHIT token. Our goal is to distribute most of the tokens to the people who invested in shitty ICOs. It would be hard to do the same with the prof of work coin that multiple people mined since 2013. Ethereum ERC-20 token fits best for this. And we are NOT CNBC reporters

So some other media outlet then? Why actually do this whole thing?

[Javi_Anibarro]

lol,
if you really want to know the most shittiest ICOs ever made was Voxelus,
look at current price right now,
that time the price for the ICOs was 150.000 satoshi,
and the most important thing that it catagorized as the most shittiest ICOs ever made because they're failure to give us the promises,
afterward they made an open apologize for doing it.
back then they made a bold statement to get listed on poloniex when the ICOs finished,
they're collecting a millions dollar but fail to fullfill their promise,and the POLONIEX decline it directly when they made it.

[ShitTeam]

Great candidates for the worst ICO ever. So far we have:

• OPHION
• Bitcad
• authorship
• Monkey
• OPAIR
• EBITZ
• SHOPEO
• chronologic
• Voxelus

I've updated the OP

[DigiAset]

All the scams are the worst in the history of Cryptocurrency.. People should aware of the project..

[BeggarInCryptos]

You have forgotten probably a lot of ICOs which actually turned out to be just nothing but scams, like for example LUST - which I think is still popping app in the ANN category, and which has a thread which is made up only by them discussing with each others.

[ShitTeam]

You have forgotten probably a lot of ICOs which actually turned out to be just nothing but scams, like for example LUST - which I think is still popping app in the ANN category, and which has a thread which is made up only by them discussing with each others.

LUST is a great choice. Thanks! I've added it to the list.

So far we have a great list of the worst ICOs. Let us know what we've missed.

Maybe instead of distributing SHIT token to the holders of only 1 shitty ICO, we should just do an airdrop to the whole list? If you own tokens in any ICOs from the list then you get SHIT tokens distributed to you. The more tokens you own the more SHIT tokens you receive. And for the next round of SHIT distribution there will be a new list. Those shitty ICOs pop up everyday so SHIT token distribution will never be over. What do you think?