ICO Regulations

[Helga.Alekseyuk]

Hey hey, Crypto-Folk!

I'm just curious what do you think, guys, what kind of regulation can be set to bring ICO "under control"?

[jacquelinecr]

You can't do it with regulations. At some point the bubble will break and all ICO will be affected.

Am the girl that believes in the Phoenix at which the good ICO's will continue their course and develop a product.

Regulations will not make the difference but our way of understanding and valuing ICO's

[kambaralikhan]

I think regulations will not make much difference to ICO

[ryanben]

It is possible that future ICO projects will be legally bound by the countries. It means that before they can come up with an ICO project, their team must work with the government on the minimum and maximum amount of ICO implementation. This would make it difficult for ICO projects to be created for fraudulent purposes

[xenomorphe1]

Or maybe ICO should only be done in the country of the company? It would be legal only for residents of the country. But that would limit a lot ICO... Maybe ICO would disappear if they do this.

[Minecache]

If governments will identify investors and control every now and then the initial sence of ICO would gone I suppose(( But this will lead us to new type of ICO - decentralized ICO   I believe!

[Yanidas]

I don't like regulations because it leaves so much space for political interests...People should just be cautious and smart and invest only in real projects, only with money that they afford to gamble/lose. I don't understand why greedy, uneducated people have to be protected from foolishly investing their money.

[Karpeles]

Just apply the current laws.

If an ICO is a scam or are breaking the law then they should suffer the consequence. No additional regulations need to be created.

[Pfeff]

If you buy an ICO, you deserve to lose your money. Market will correct itself

[rezurect]

If you buy an ICO, you deserve to lose your money. Market will correct itself

Why? If people or companies make promises or guarantee's on paper you should never believe in them?
If that were true, successful investors wouldn't exist.

Although I get your point, there are lot's of scams going around.

[crazylikeafox]

It is possible that future ICO projects will be legally bound by the countries. It means that before they can come up with an ICO project, their team must work with the government on the minimum and maximum amount of ICO implementation. This would make it difficult for ICO projects to be created for fraudulent purposes

Yes, possibly but for me its like only purpose is formality sake when they turned into scam would you spend more money catching them. I dont think so these regulation is a waste of time and pointless.

[AgatioX]

The whole idea about crypto's is decentralization.

ICO's will be decentralized too.
Once again,check out Komodo platform as a good example for that.

I believe that banks and gov's are screwed.

[omonuyak]

Hey hey, Crypto-Folk!

I'm just curious what do you think, guys, what kind of regulation can be set to bring ICO "under control"?

Ico regulations should be done before evil people started to use it to raise money for  they evil project. If the banned of ico by Chinese regulatory authority is to create more time to be able to come up with the modality and guideline for ico fund raising,it Is a best ideas and  The regulations will safeguide they citizens from taking unreasonable risk that most of the ico project has created.

[CrypticMira]

Just apply the current laws.

If an ICO is a scam or are breaking the law then they should suffer the consequence. No additional regulations need to be created.

Exactly that! I also hate when politicians try to pass new laws to profile themselves instead of applying what is already there. There are plenty of laws to choose from to make any additional laws totally unnecessary.

[adam1230]

few days ago Sasha (Founder of WAVES) pointed this regulations on other way.
he said : "WAVES platform will have self regulations "
For the community self regulations will be wonderfull. So %80 of scam Ico's will never get 1 satoshi

[Koadharber]

If governments will identify investors and control every now and then the initial sence of ICO would gone I suppose(( But this will lead us to new type of ICO - decentralized ICO   I believe!

Its not decentralized but its a centralized stuff since its being regulated already which we cant really hide our faces when we do tend to invest into a particular ICO.This might be good for others but would really be bad thing for those people who do really have concern about anonymity.If all ICO would be regulated then ti would really gain different reactions on most people on this cryptoworld.

[CuriousGeorge]

Hey hey, Crypto-Folk!

I'm just curious what do you think, guys, what kind of regulation can be set to bring ICO "under control"?

That was obviously true, Because there is a guarantee about the team that wants to raise the money through the icos such as they must complete the verification and that was become eligible to run the ico to creates its innovation. I think that will gives the more security or guarantee to the investors, because that will decrease the scammers.

[okbit]

I think it is a given that in the US, the SEC will be involved. That is a good thing for crypto in my opinion. There were entirely too man scams. This will weed them out.

[cryptonianz]

How do you regulate something that is decentralized?

Even if you ban it people will want to buy it!

Isn't there is always a way to buy something?

[helloge]

I think it is a given that in the US, the SEC will be involved. That is a good thing for crypto in my opinion. There were entirely too man scams. This will weed them out.

Yes, I also think the ICO regulations in China is a good thing to the ICO investors since there are many scams, some ICO projects even do not have a whitepaper and they want to raise a lot of money, that is crazy.