usorin
|
|
October 01, 2017, 07:49:46 PM |
|
A lot of advantage with the new wallet. Day by day the news are better and better. Keep it on and thank for the update.
|
|
|
|
CryptoNewKey
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2017, 09:48:36 PM |
|
Does anyone know how do I download the original Bitcoin first?
|
|
|
|
cyberpitstop
|
|
October 01, 2017, 11:56:07 PM |
|
Is there some up and coming changes planned for BitCoin that is going to cause another split???
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
October 02, 2017, 04:29:26 AM |
|
Does anyone know how do I download the original Bitcoin first?
"Original Bitcoin"? This is the *original Bitcoin*. Is there some up and coming changes planned for BitCoin that is going to cause another split???
No. There is a planned altcoin by a malicious group of corporate baboons called Segwit2x.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
Loni
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2017, 04:48:10 AM |
|
I'm interested, if on old laptops the speed of synchronization will be higher too
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
October 02, 2017, 04:50:35 AM |
|
I'm interested, if on old laptops the speed of synchronization will be higher too
Yes. The speedup of 0.15.0 is more noticeable on slower systems, and those that use the default dbcache size.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
okae
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1008
northern exposure
|
|
October 02, 2017, 08:56:04 AM |
|
I don't know why you didn't include it, but from my point of view is a good idea to include the SHA256SUMS text in this topic, of course, people should always research it for themself but at least they will have one more site to contrast his info. b1ac0cd472f98040fbce9cea79348da2c6140a452427f9fe56d060413ec67f2d bitcoin-0.15.0.1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz 7fb2290464ff056213593878cac1d111422204e81b1ccb93f95b145c309895c5 bitcoin-0.15.0.1-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz 061bdd552fdc048a98e04ab436165b121346ecd989e1bc91db0246888fcadf7d bitcoin-0.15.0.1-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz 23a36e28295ef05faf67d41be0610d5f5f1059d904aa74efca7a6700a82d6dc2 bitcoin-0.15.0.1-osx64.tar.gz 9f90a5b5623287b762e3280fd86fc7adc7180a071513d5d663133f030452b1dd bitcoin-0.15.0.1-osx.dmg b57e9e756018e4082f5557a4216195b0cd197c5a62473b6fe0509a0aa71e519b bitcoin-0.15.0.1.tar.gz f3e7ef9ac9d510a185efb0f0253dc1f49d627768999a66f13e86de4c38854680 bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win32-setup.exe 49578a464d043f278805b145cd8f59b115e6f41cd56de0a90049da1781df9d59 bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win32.zip f0aebade2b43e253ad66fd920e00524048f5a9b9933936e735844d316433791a bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win64-setup.exe 25efad99a4128d9f197d7eb1c175e7597478ae39e3d05805f14e9c01392b41ae bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win64.zip ae3efa47bf87a694a5368cd6fea96c9942fe9be7856720b5027c8902e46a88d1 bitcoin-0.15.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
|
|
|
|
Mr.GottaGo
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
October 02, 2017, 04:23:46 PM |
|
I actualy feel stupid when I realize how little I know compared to u guys damn ...
|
|
|
|
OmegaStarScream
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3528
Merit: 6188
|
|
October 02, 2017, 05:11:10 PM |
|
The developers are not taking this seriously or I'm missing something? I mean how could they implement SegWit without a making standard for verifying and signing messages? I didn't knew this until saw a couple of Reddit posts about Trezor and Ledger nano S.
|
|
|
|
achow101 (OP)
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 6748
Just writing some code
|
|
October 02, 2017, 05:23:03 PM |
|
The developers are not taking this seriously or I'm missing something? I mean how could they implement SegWit without a making standard for verifying and signing messages? I didn't knew this until saw a couple of Reddit posts about Trezor and Ledger nano S.
There already is a standard: the one that we have been using for the past several years. Messages shouldn't really be "signed with an address" or verify to an address since addresses really correspond to a specific output script whereas signed messages (signed anything really) corresponds to a public key. P2PKH and P2WPKH addresses also happen to correspond to a public key so people found it simpler to abstract "signed with public key" to "signed with a public key that corresponds with this address". P2PKH addresses can easily be translated to a P2WPKH. But message signing and verification really shouldn't have anything to do with addresses, rather it is all about key hashes which P2PKH and P2WPKH both use.
|
|
|
|
Ayaancool
|
|
October 04, 2017, 10:37:13 AM |
|
the new version is much more better than the old.Now it is much more faster [so, there is no room for waiting],and the new features makes it much more elegent.i am very glad that they fixed almost bugs in the old version.
|
|
|
|
BTC Turkiye
|
|
October 05, 2017, 03:51:50 AM |
|
I don`t see much of a speed change
|
Farklı Borsaların Anlık Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum ve Bitcoin Cash Kurunu Takip Edebilirsiniz. BTCkur.com
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
October 05, 2017, 05:51:22 AM |
|
I don`t see much of a speed change
If you think that, then you have very bad perception and you have no idea how to benchmark. v0.15.0 is faster on any kind of hardware by a significant margin that can be easily confirmed with a test (e.g. IBD or reindex time).
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
HYIPcoinDEV
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2017, 05:50:31 PM |
|
I love core team, this is why segwit2x has no support. As far as i can tell just big businesses trying to control btc
|
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3074
|
|
October 11, 2017, 03:44:45 PM |
|
Apparently so. MeshCollider and achow101 are both technically well informed in general, and I also checked their explanations made sense to me, which they did.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
Gulnora
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2017, 06:13:38 AM |
|
There's probably going to be another split between bitcoin legacy and SegWit2X version of bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
IsotopeDeveloper
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2017, 06:21:04 AM |
|
Once again the bitcoin affiliate consumer does not base it on the core but the constant flow. It pertains to the actual bitcoin to cash out after all.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
October 12, 2017, 06:34:21 AM |
|
There's probably going to be another split between bitcoin legacy and SegWit2X version of bitcoin.
That is irrelevant and will just be another altcoin. Make sure to proceed with caution as it has no replay protection, thus spending it might be dangerous.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
fromcoins
|
|
October 15, 2017, 02:53:44 PM |
|
Amidst all this, but I kind of think all this fork thing is propagated by some sole developers who wants gain for the selves even though community benefits little somehow.
Which ever fork, BITCOIN remains BTC
|
|
|
|
maryannabon
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
October 16, 2017, 09:54:20 AM |
|
Is there any possibility that the bitcoin will going down after segwit?
|
|
|
|
|