RSantana (OP)
Member
 Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
CoinedBits.com
|
 |
June 24, 2011, 03:50:58 PM |
|
Satoshi Nakamoto currently has a page on Wikipedia, however it looks like the page will go away. the page was originally marked for deletion, a discussion ensued, and they abruptly closed the discussion and concluded that it should be merged with the Bitcoin article. Despite the majority of those involved expressing interest in keeping the page. If you are familiar with the wikipedia processes I would encourage you to participate in helping Satoshi keep his rightful place at Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kokjo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
You are WRONG!
|
 |
June 24, 2011, 03:55:14 PM |
|
Satoshi Nakamoto currently has a page on Wikipedia, however it looks like the page will go away. the page was originally marked for deletion, a discussion ensued, and they abruptly closed the discussion and concluded that it should be merged with the Bitcoin article. Despite the majority of those involved expressing interest in keeping the page. If you are familiar with the wikipedia processes I would encourage you to participate in helping Satoshi keep his rightful place at Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamotosounds like a good idea! no offence... but it should merged into the bitcoin article |
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
Enochian
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:13:10 PM |
|
It's hard to justify a page for a persistent nym we don't even know is a real person.
Satoshi could be Tim May with Alzheimer's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RandyMarsh
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:15:06 PM |
|
that looks like a detectives homework, not a wikipedia article.
Edit: and thus, yes i agree, it does somewhat warrant deletion
|
Stan?! STAN?!?!
|
|
|
|
foo
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:17:31 PM |
|
Wikipedia is correct.
|
I know this because Tyler knows this.
|
|
|
RSantana (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
CoinedBits.com
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:20:17 PM |
|
Ok maybe I'm an anomaly here in thinking that the creator of Bitcoin, a brilliant entity (his real name is irrelevant) who created the worlds first decentralized "currency" isn't worth having a page on Wikipedia :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Adam
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:23:56 PM |
|
It's not that I don't think the actions merit an article, but I don't think enough is really known about the person to distinguish him from the project as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitman_Begins
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:24:53 PM |
|
|
Want to join Tradehill.com? Please use this referral code as you join: TH-R18919 Join the Bitcoin Randomizer using this link and start winning Bitcoins! http://rand.bitcat.ch/?ref=128Tip me! 1NBN21CDpuc6Gyns2oqRjDSvxaanMeYfbY |
|
|
|
RandyMarsh
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:25:08 PM |
|
I think he diffidently deserves a page, a small bio, some financial information, education, and a section on bitcoin. But the article as it stands is not wikipedia material, and yes his real name and as an extension of that, definitive information with cited sources are all very important.
|
Stan?! STAN?!?!
|
|
|
|
Litt
|
|
June 24, 2011, 04:29:30 PM |
|
I would rather preserve his own page than combine it. If not now, it will be that way again in time. I'm certain of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Astro
|
|
June 24, 2011, 10:10:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AntiVigilante
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2011, 10:13:06 PM |
|
Satoshi Nakamoto currently has a page on Wikipedia, however it looks like the page will go away. the page was originally marked for deletion, a discussion ensued, and they abruptly closed the discussion and concluded that it should be merged with the Bitcoin article. Despite the majority of those involved expressing interest in keeping the page. If you are familiar with the wikipedia processes I would encourage you to participate in helping Satoshi keep his rightful place at Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_NakamotoThere's a page for Anonymous. QED. |
|
|
|
|
Freakin
|
|
June 24, 2011, 10:21:18 PM |
|
That page is worthless and should be merged.
|
|
|
|
|
AntiVigilante
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2011, 10:27:44 PM |
|
That page is worthless and should be merged.
What's with all the nerd rage? |
|
|
|
|
