Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 10:00:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Proper PPLNS lastNshares calculation for script based coin pools - CLOSED  (Read 5081 times)
the1silverwolf (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 30, 2013, 04:58:41 PM
Last edit: May 30, 2013, 09:33:08 PM by the1silverwolf
 #1

As most of you know the PPLNS calculation in mmcFE by default is based upon a fixed number.  This isn't really the way PPLNS is supposed to work.  It needs to be based upon the block difficulty at the time.

The normal calculation that I can find is difficulty * 2 = lastNshares, but this doesn't make sense for script based coins, even if you multiply the difficulty * 65536 as cgminer does.

Example, WDC's current difficulty is 1.62864385.  1.62864385 * 65536 = 106,168.32, which as I understand it is why CGMINER reports 107k as the block difficulty (it rounds).  But this would yield a lastNshares value of 212,337 (rounded) shares.  This doesn't make any sense as the average number of shares necessary to solve a block on my WDC pool is a little over 12,000 at the moment.

Since scrypt mining is about 1/1000 as efficient as SHA256 mining (kh/s instead of mh/s) I thought about dividing this figure by 1,000, but that also yields a number that doesn't make any sense, namely 212 shares (rounded).

Dividing the figure by 10 would yield 21,233 shares and that seems reasonable.  Some rounds are more than that and some are less, but I just picked that out of thin air and would like some input on what a proper calculation would be.

Hopefully someone with a better understanding of the math involved can chime in and help me out here.  I'd like to thank you guys in advance for your time.  I searched the forums but did not find anything relevant.

--
the1silverwolf
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
the1silverwolf (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 30, 2013, 05:27:28 PM
 #2

No ideas ?

--
the1silverwolf
grue
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431



View Profile
May 30, 2013, 08:05:56 PM
 #3

No ideas ?
maybe if you give more than 30 minutes for someone to write a reply...

It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

Adblock for annoying signature ads | Enhanced Merit UI
the1silverwolf (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 30, 2013, 09:33:50 PM
 #4

Anyone looking for the solution, please go here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=220341

--
the1silverwolf
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!