sairon (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
One does not simply mine Bitcoins
|
|
June 16, 2013, 02:02:59 PM |
|
Occassionaly, one of the images, two of them or all three images on the right does not show up.
It's a known issue. Usually it comes up on the next graph update (every hour). I'll look into it when I have the time.
|
GPG key ID: 5E4F108A || BTC: 1hoardyponb9AMWhyA28DZb5n5g2bRY8v
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
sairon (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
One does not simply mine Bitcoins
|
|
July 15, 2013, 04:33:26 PM |
|
Now with a countdown to next Nfactor change on the graphs page! (javascript required) Also, added timestamp of last graph update.
|
GPG key ID: 5E4F108A || BTC: 1hoardyponb9AMWhyA28DZb5n5g2bRY8v
|
|
|
sairon (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
One does not simply mine Bitcoins
|
|
August 14, 2013, 05:24:04 PM |
|
Changed the Y axis of the all-time network hashrate graph to logarithmic scale, in order to to able to see the current hashrate.
|
GPG key ID: 5E4F108A || BTC: 1hoardyponb9AMWhyA28DZb5n5g2bRY8v
|
|
|
igysa
|
|
August 14, 2013, 06:44:57 PM |
|
block time is so slow now after N changed.. takes ages to verify transfer
|
BTC 1Hm2qSb1XZ8iAuogEqCBod17KQPHepjwF LTC LWu3fAQuw36UVm6vASQgk6yQjgLgKmeWPD YAC YKVQi33Jv7UaBtStgTDiCB2uL6vsYdX7be
|
|
|
Bakaboy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
August 14, 2013, 07:16:32 PM |
|
block time is so slow now after N changed.. takes ages to verify transfer Takes a while for the difficulty to adjust, no recourse but to wait.
|
|
|
|
sairon (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
One does not simply mine Bitcoins
|
|
August 15, 2013, 07:18:48 PM |
|
block time is so slow now after N changed.. takes ages to verify transfer Takes a while for the difficulty to adjust, no recourse but to wait. Just another 108 seconds less and we're back at 60. Also, top 50 richest addresses list updated as per request at http://yacointalk.com/index.php/topic,425.0.htmlSomeone now owns (at least) 0.6M YAC (out of 5.6M), cool!
|
GPG key ID: 5E4F108A || BTC: 1hoardyponb9AMWhyA28DZb5n5g2bRY8v
|
|
|
sairon (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
One does not simply mine Bitcoins
|
|
August 17, 2013, 10:15:05 AM |
|
Modified difficulty graphs to NOT show PoS difficulty, as it is orders of magnitude lower than PoW diff (uses different "scale", but it was displayed as 0.25 - which is now higher than PoW diff, LOL).
|
GPG key ID: 5E4F108A || BTC: 1hoardyponb9AMWhyA28DZb5n5g2bRY8v
|
|
|
sairon (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
One does not simply mine Bitcoins
|
|
September 13, 2013, 01:13:58 PM |
|
Address balance list updated up to block #210732. Also, here's a normalized hashrate graph, assuming 50% hashrate decrease on each Nfactor change (I'm not entirely convinced it's correct). The formula I'm using is: f_normalize(time, hashrate) = hashrate / (0.5**(f_getNfactor(time) - 9))
where 0.5 is the hashrate decrease factor and 9 is the Nfactor we're normalizing for (N=1024 as in litecoin and other altcoins). I don't like the sharp drops after each Nfactor change. Any clues as to why might this be happening? Could this be because of broken GPU miners that needed code changes for each N change? Also, need feedback on the 50% figure.
|
GPG key ID: 5E4F108A || BTC: 1hoardyponb9AMWhyA28DZb5n5g2bRY8v
|
|
|
Joe_Bauers
|
|
September 13, 2013, 01:22:42 PM Last edit: September 13, 2013, 01:47:34 PM by Joe_Bauers |
|
Address balance list updated up to block #210732. Also, here's a normalized hashrate graph, assuming 50% hashrate decrease on each Nfactor change (I'm not entirely convinced it's correct). The formula I'm using is: f_normalize(time, hashrate) = hashrate / (0.5**(f_getNfactor(time) - 9))
where 0.5 is the hashrate decrease factor and 9 is the Nfactor we're normalizing for (N=1024 as in litecoin and other altcoins). I don't like the sharp drops after each Nfactor change. Any clues as to why might this be happening? Could this be because of broken GPU miners that needed code changes for each N change? Also, need feedback on the 50% figure. Looks good sairon! I also think it might be useful to show normalized difficulty, but I'm also not entirely convinced that the formula is correct. I am quite certain though that the sharp drops after each N change are due to h/w errors, and essentially is showing that YACoin is working as designed - i.e. it's a CPU coin.
|
|
|
|
patoberli
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
March 05, 2014, 03:28:19 PM |
|
Link is sadly dead now
|
YAC: YA86YiWSvWEGSSSerPTMy4kwndabRUNftf BTC: 16NqvkYbKMnonVEf7jHbuWURFsLeuTRidX LTC: LTKCoiDwqEjaRCoNXfFhDm9EeWbGWouZjE
|
|
|
Joe_Bauers
|
|
March 06, 2014, 05:32:01 PM Last edit: March 06, 2014, 06:42:34 PM by Joe_Bauers |
|
The explorer page is now @ explorer.yacoin.org Post has been updated.
|
|
|
|
|