Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 08:42:05 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2017-09-28]PBOC Media: Bitcoin and Blockchain Should Be Treated Separately  (Read 4346 times)
hl5460 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1620
Merit: 1000


news.8btc.com


View Profile WWW
September 28, 2017, 08:06:02 AM
 #1

Today the Financial News, a media under PBOC, reports that shutting down exchanges is not going to affect the development of blockchain technology. The article justify the “Exchange Ban” as “an important measure to maintain financial security and stability” and cryptocurrency and blockchain should be treated separately. The authority still favors the development of blockchain technology. Meanwhile, Bitkan, a Shenzhen-based blockchain startup founded in 2013, announces service shutdown by 30 September.


http://news.8btc.com/pboc-media-bitcoin-and-blockchain-should-be-treated-separately

Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531


yes


View Profile
September 28, 2017, 02:23:04 PM
 #2

How is a blockchain supposed to function without a token?

iram1011
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 521



View Profile
September 28, 2017, 02:56:15 PM
 #3

How is a blockchain supposed to function without a token?
I didn't understand why according to you blockchain won't function without tokens?

From Wikipedia:-
A blockchain – originally block chain – is a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked and secured using cryptography.

Where is the mention of token here? Blockchain is usually used for storing data in a transparent and secure manner free from any type of unauthorized manipulation. It has potential to disrupt many industries like banks, e commerce, social sites etc by making the storing of data better and secure.

Blockchain can certainly thrive without cryptocurrencies.
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531


yes


View Profile
September 28, 2017, 03:10:24 PM
 #4

To me, the token forms the incentive to sustain the blockchain. How would unrelated parties be incentivised to upkeep and sustain a blockchain without a reward? How would transactions be limited and protected from abuse without (token) fees?

iamTom123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 501



View Profile
September 28, 2017, 03:25:12 PM
 #5

Today the Financial News, a media under PBOC, reports that shutting down exchanges is not going to affect the development of blockchain technology. The article justify the “Exchange Ban” as “an important measure to maintain financial security and stability” and cryptocurrency and blockchain should be treated separately. The authority still favors the development of blockchain technology. Meanwhile, Bitkan, a Shenzhen-based blockchain startup founded in 2013, announces service shutdown by 30 September. http://news.8btc.com/pboc-media-bitcoin-and-blockchain-should-be-treated-separately

China wants to have the advantages presented by the blockchain technology without accepting the Bitcoin as the main coin for this new innovation. Since blockchain technology is an open source there is no one who can stop China from getting into blockchain...and I am wondering had Satoshi patented the same technology and just grant limited access into it maybe China would pay a big price just to get hold of this innovative platform.

I still believe though that even if Bitcoin can live and prosper without the big China market, one day China will be back into the Bitcoin club but maybe requiring all participants and stakeholders to observe strict regulatory framework. I am also happy that it seems the market has already moved on from the China influence and is now surging due to some good news from the other countries which are already into Bitcoin.
iram1011
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 521



View Profile
September 28, 2017, 04:19:56 PM
 #6

To me, the token forms the incentive to sustain the blockchain. How would unrelated parties be incentivised to upkeep and sustain a blockchain without a reward? How would transactions be limited and protected from abuse without (token) fees?
Many of the companies in discussion about blockchain are looking at private blockchains, like what all the big banks in R3 are looking at implementing, have different needs and requirements. They don't need miners and they can create some small token just pass it around internally with each granted permission given into the network.

By no need of token, I meant those cryptocurrencies that are already established like Bitcoin or altcoins. Government can certainly ban those coins but can benefit from blockchain tech. Blockchain can exist without these decentralised cryptocurrencies.
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531


yes


View Profile
September 28, 2017, 09:15:30 PM
 #7

But would it be blockchains or just databases dressed up with a fancy word called 'blockchain'?

hl5460 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1620
Merit: 1000


news.8btc.com


View Profile WWW
October 09, 2017, 03:27:32 AM
 #8

How is a blockchain supposed to function without a token?
I didn't understand why according to you blockchain won't function without tokens?

From Wikipedia:-
A blockchain – originally block chain – is a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked and secured using cryptography.

Where is the mention of token here? Blockchain is usually used for storing data in a transparent and secure manner free from any type of unauthorized manipulation. It has potential to disrupt many industries like banks, e commerce, social sites etc by making the storing of data better and secure.

Blockchain can certainly thrive without cryptocurrencies.

Blockchain projects funded by institutions are fine without tokens.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!