Bitcointalk Username: DunnDy
Rank: Member
Current post count: 88
BTC Address (SegWit): bc1qgsym3776plp4qzuj28szzkmvpt5sym3pg9zzjx
Bitcointalk Username: haxker007
Rank: Member
Current post count: 85+1`
BTC Address (SegWit): 38YvWFZM4CKQ81BDPZ1aktkzMqDRfAZ5R4
Bitcointalk Username: Noore Najjar
Rank:Full Member
Current post count: 301
BTC Address (SegWit): 3Egykav11nSLFrqy3GK48HgffWjfJn4e5x
Denied.
Payment received. I don't understand why you still use blockchain.info tho, it seems they still don't support segwit so the addresses don't show up. Why not use a block explorer which supports it? if you want to support segwit you might as well use an explorer that supports it.
Payment received. I don't understand why you still use blockchain.info tho, it seems they still don't support segwit so the addresses don't show up. Why not use a block explorer which supports it? if you want to support segwit you might as well use an explorer that supports it.
Segwit support =/= bech32 support. You guys don't seem to understand that there is, and what exactly the difference is between encapsulated Segwit and native Segwit. Regardless, that explorer has been traditionally used to post the TX ID. It shouldn't matter to you what link I post as long as the ID is present.