Whether people like it or not, the cost of validating is intrinsically tied to whether or not users can utilize Bitcoin without trusting anyone else.
Without relying on third parties that can choose to act as gatekeepers.
When I am confronted with the types of ultimatums, arguments, emotionally manipulative pleas(such as the ones in your article trying to stoke fear of a contentious hardfork while at the same time advocating for one) from people who seemingly fail to grasp the true complexities and nature of Bitcoin’s scaling issues, I see it as people attempting to take control of my money.
I will never accept that.
I will never compromise that. That’s not because of tribalism, or “blindness” to the non-technical aspects of Bitcoin. That is because I am here for a trustless immutable money.
If that is what you are here for, there is no need for compromises, just patience.
La dernière phrase est ce que je ressens déjà depuis 2016 (je suis dans le Bitcoin depuis 2014).
L'impact de départ est maintenant lancé et la politique diffusée lentement par le développement du Bitcoin reste constant et persistant malgré les attaques régulières sur tous les fronts.
Les gens utilisant le Bitcoin comprennent, mieux que ceux qui ne l'utilisent pas, que c'est pas qu'une monnaie ...
c'est une idée,
une solution,
un but,
un travail,
un projet,
une construction
... un flux permanent d'évolution.