Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 03:49:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is S2X already on life support?  (Read 858 times)
exstasie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521


View Profile
October 08, 2017, 09:15:19 AM
 #21

I kind of wonder how much depends on the ticker symbol. Bitcoin = BTC right? Not BCC or BCH or BTC1 or whatever else.

Bitcoin is BTC. Who decides this? Top exchanges. That is a lot of power resting there.

The problem for exchanges -- and particularly regulated/licensed exchanges like Coinbase and Bitflyer -- is that they have legal concerns with regard to custody. If they start giving people this new altcoin in place of bitcoins held in custody, for example, they would probably face a lot of lawsuits.

I don't think they can flex their muscles and simply decide which coin is "Bitcoin." That's up to the market. The safest thing for exchanges to do IMO is let the incumbent retain the title/ticker until the market has clearly decided otherwise.

1715096940
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715096940

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715096940
Reply with quote  #2

1715096940
Report to moderator
1715096940
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715096940

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715096940
Reply with quote  #2

1715096940
Report to moderator
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715096940
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715096940

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715096940
Reply with quote  #2

1715096940
Report to moderator
Samarkand
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 282


View Profile
October 08, 2017, 09:28:49 AM
 #22

I kind of wonder how much depends on the ticker symbol. Bitcoin = BTC right? Not BCC or BCH or BTC1 or whatever else.

Bitcoin is BTC. Who decides this? Top exchanges. That is a lot of power resting there.

Exchanges have a lot of power. Most heavy miners send their coins straight to the exchanges so they ultimately end up being puppets to the exchanges...

I´m not sure where you got this information.

Most miners sell OTC and not on exchanges. OTC has obvious advantages if you sell large amounts - as the miners do - because
you avoid slippage and don´t scare the market by big sells. Besides, many miners hold certain parts of their mining rewards for
the long term instead of sending them "straight to the exchanges", because they can increase their profit substantially if the BTC price rises.

Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3427
Merit: 4344



View Profile
October 08, 2017, 09:43:39 AM
 #23

Quote
roger ver has gone off the deep end and is taking the opposite approach to bitfinex, saying that segwit2x will be the default bitcoin blockchain and BTC ticker.

hah. this was priceless.
if it is really true i would love a reference. because Roger was calling bitcoin cash "default bitcoin" now it is SegWit2x! LOL

Roger and Jeff are sneaky snakes. What about those poor people buying his Bcash shit coin.

People can lose there money with 2x and they're promoting it...scumbags.

https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/916438756382535691
https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/1835#issuecomment-334869248
BTCLovingDude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010

BTC to the moon is inevitable...


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2017, 09:51:41 AM
 #24

I kind of wonder how much depends on the ticker symbol. Bitcoin = BTC right? Not BCC or BCH or BTC1 or whatever else.

Bitcoin is BTC. Who decides this? Top exchanges. That is a lot of power resting there.

Exchanges have a lot of power. Most heavy miners send their coins straight to the exchanges so they ultimately end up being puppets to the exchanges. If an exchange decides to go one way then they alter their miners to ensure that they are making the most profit at the end of the day.
In a way it's kind of ironic/hypercritical. Bitcoin is meant to be decentralised but the lack of trust and power given to small exchanges means that the bigger exchanges are the ones calling the shots at the end of the day  Undecided

i agree with parts of what you said not all of it. for instance you are correct that exchanges have a lot of power but this power has been diminishing as the total trade volume spreads among multiple exchanges instead of all of it being in one place.

and as other comment said above me, miners don't send their coins to exchanges. they do it off the market if they are big mining farms and smaller miners get paid small amounts that doesn't matter where they sell.

and finally bitcoin is decentralized not bitcoin price. it is a free market, the price will eventually be set based on supply and demand even if the short term is looking weird.

--looking for signature--
acquafredda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1481



View Profile
October 08, 2017, 10:15:55 AM
 #25

Quote
roger ver has gone off the deep end and is taking the opposite approach to bitfinex, saying that segwit2x will be the default bitcoin blockchain and BTC ticker.

hah. this was priceless.
if it is really true i would love a reference. because Roger was calling bitcoin cash "default bitcoin" now it is SegWit2x! LOL

Roger and Jeff are sneaky snakes. What about those poor people buying his Bcash shit coin.

People can lose there money with 2x and they're promoting it...scumbags.

https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/916438756382535691
https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues/1835#issuecomment-334869248
Thanks for referencing it! Unbelievable what these guys are doing to bitcoin. Next November is possibly the worst of times for Bitcoin history and I hope that is going to be the endgame for those people. I've seen many things since I first heard of Bitcoin in 2010 but this is too much
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3556
Merit: 5041



View Profile
October 17, 2017, 04:29:19 PM
 #26

I think the bigger question is, when are we going to see an end to attempts to support all these constant bogus forks?

I know it's putting unneeded stress on their businesses. Perhaps if companies like Coinbase and the exchanges get tired of having to deal with all the forking and providing means to the coins for their customers, they will finally put an end to all this nonsense by stating "Any and all future forks that are contentiously launched, we are flat out just not going to support. Period."

I'm guessing it'll only take another round of this shit or maybe two before they finally throw in the towel.

Haha, as I predicted it is already starting.  Grin

https://novaexchange.com/news/

Quote
"We are NOT supporting any upcoming or future bitcoin forks. We are only running Bitcoin Core wallet and no other Bitcoin forks will be supported in the future"
centralbanksequalsbombs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 278

Bitcoin :open immutable decentralized global fair


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 01:38:52 AM
 #27

I think the bigger question is, when are we going to see an end to attempts to support all these constant bogus forks?

I know it's putting unneeded stress on their businesses. Perhaps if companies like Coinbase and the exchanges get tired of having to deal with all the forking and providing means to the coins for their customers, they will finally put an end to all this nonsense by stating "Any and all future forks that are contentiously launched, we are flat out just not going to support. Period."

I'm guessing it'll only take another round of this shit or maybe two before they finally throw in the towel.

There wont be an end until the central-bank/VC-funded DCG-portfolio of companies meet their demise. All the evil anti-bitcoin propoganda/agendas stem from their businesses that seem great at face value and first-glance, however underneath lays an operation to undermine bitcoin. (PSA: do not support Coinbase, Kraken, Coindesk, Bitpay).

FiendCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 263


The devil is in the detail.


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 02:16:09 AM
 #28

Unless 2X adds some kind of EDA like bcash or the price on the futures rise significantly or the future markets are wrong, 2X is DOA.

"Darkness is good. Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That's power." -Steve Bannon
fabiorem
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 347


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 02:45:03 AM
 #29

dumped like BCH

You cant dump it without replay protection, that is a fact.
exstasie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 07:25:23 AM
 #30

dumped like BCH

You cant dump it without replay protection, that is a fact.

No it's not. Exchanges and wallet/service providers are actually tasked with implementing their own native replay protection. One method is to use coinbase tainting to make transactions invalid on the original chain. Another method involves using locktime and RBF.

Poloniex was one of the first to show that this was possible. When the ETH/ETC split occurred, there was no replay protection. They began splitting ETH deposits into ETH/ETC after the fork and crediting it to user accounts. It's totally possible as long as exchanges are methodical about it.

Some users will definitely lose money trying to split their coins, though.

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!