|
dedmaroz
|
 |
November 13, 2017, 03:49:51 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
you have problem with reading whitepaper? Well i don't have problems with "reading whitepaper", I have some questions for devs, ok? |
|
|
|
|
|
Neymar10
|
|
November 13, 2017, 03:53:18 PM |
|
Maybe i'm just too lazy for i did not read your White Paper i just look and read this Announcement and it leaves me with a wonder, how could this project works? What i have found is the team behind, some enticing words and the links to some write-ups.
It might be the reason why this thread is very slow and needs some encouraging factors to be alive.
Whitepaper reads very hard, a lot of details that are difficult to understand to a person who is not familiar with the investment market and other things. But I think this should read and read, if you want to invest! |
|
|
|
|
|
skovbitcoin
|
|
November 13, 2017, 03:54:30 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? |
|
|
|
|
|
ooxtcoo
|
|
November 13, 2017, 03:55:02 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
you have problem with reading whitepaper? Well i don't have problems with "reading whitepaper", I have some questions for devs, ok? hmmm understand you.Nicely said lol |
|
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
November 13, 2017, 03:59:24 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? Wel... It's not quite like a "new" strategy. They simply reduced the amount of investment at the initial stage of the project, and also increased the number of companies. Is it possible to call this a new strategy? |
|
|
|
|
|
MehdiBmm
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:00:37 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
|
|
|
|
|
|
mitsarasss
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:01:53 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO  |
|
|
|
|
|
zero9119
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:03:07 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol |
|
|
|
|
|
skovbitcoin
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:03:58 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? Wel... It's not quite like a "new" strategy. They simply reduced the amount of investment at the initial stage of the project, and also increased the number of companies. Is it possible to call this a new strategy? So, I think this is the principle of a quantitative portfolio approach, is not it? This reduces risks, and increases the profit potential! |
|
|
|
|
|
MehdiBmm
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:05:57 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this  So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? |
|
|
|
|
|
ooxtcoo
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:10:56 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? ahaha missed but it happens,by the way, I was also interested in the question of bounty |
|
|
|
|
|
zero9119
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:15:55 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? ahaha missed but it happens,by the way, I was also interested in the question of bounty do you know where i can find information about bounty? |
|
|
|
|
|
mitsarasss
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:17:28 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? LOL dude... Try to be more attentive, all the necessary information is in the first post of the thread, and all the links. Link to bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2257918.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
zero9119
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:21:37 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? LOL dude... Try to be more attentive, all the necessary information is in the first post of the thread, and all the links. Link to bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2257918.0 thank you very much,don't know the new ICO |
|
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:22:15 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? Wel... It's not quite like a "new" strategy. They simply reduced the amount of investment at the initial stage of the project, and also increased the number of companies. Is it possible to call this a new strategy? So, I think this is the principle of a quantitative portfolio approach, is not it? This reduces risks, and increases the profit potential! Well, suppose the risk reduction is possible, if you invest a much smaller amount. But how can this positively influence profit? C'mon... I do not see anything fundamentally new in terms of portfolio investment in the pulsar scheme! Also, more projects do not provide any guarantees for the success of projects. Easily 50% of the selected projects can fail. |
|
|
|
|
|
MehdiBmm
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:23:08 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? LOL dude... Try to be more attentive, all the necessary information is in the first post of the thread, and all the links. Link to bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2257918.0I'm just following several projects at once, sometimes I'm inattentive Thanks for the info! How should the period of ICO last? |
|
|
|
|
|
mitsarasss
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:27:48 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? LOL dude... Try to be more attentive, all the necessary information is in the first post of the thread, and all the links. Link to bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2257918.0I'm just following several projects at once, sometimes I'm inattentive Thanks for the info! How should the period of ICO last? 1 Month, ICO will end on December 13, but I think this period can be extended. |
|
|
|
|
|
skovbitcoin
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:31:59 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? Wel... It's not quite like a "new" strategy. They simply reduced the amount of investment at the initial stage of the project, and also increased the number of companies. Is it possible to call this a new strategy? So, I think this is the principle of a quantitative portfolio approach, is not it? This reduces risks, and increases the profit potential! Well, suppose the risk reduction is possible, if you invest a much smaller amount. But how can this positively influence profit? C'mon... I do not see anything fundamentally new in terms of portfolio investment in the pulsar scheme! Also, more projects do not provide any guarantees for the success of projects. Easily 50% of the selected projects can fail. Investing is always a risk! No one will give you a guarantee of success of the project! The main purpose of various investment approaches is to minimize risks as much as possible. The devs decided that their approach is effective in this regard. I believe them, because the team is very experienced and knows what it does! |
|
|
|
|
|
MehdiBmm
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:33:01 PM |
|
The tokensale has already started?
Yes, just today started ICO wrote seems to be about it a few comments ago lol Aww... sorry I probably missed the message about this So what about bounty campagn? Is it already available? LOL dude... Try to be more attentive, all the necessary information is in the first post of the thread, and all the links. Link to bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2257918.0I'm just following several projects at once, sometimes I'm inattentive Thanks for the info! How should the period of ICO last? 1 Month, ICO will end on December 13, but I think this period can be extended. Why do you think this period can be extended?  |
|
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
November 13, 2017, 04:41:43 PM |
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? Wel... It's not quite like a "new" strategy. They simply reduced the amount of investment at the initial stage of the project, and also increased the number of companies. Is it possible to call this a new strategy? So, I think this is the principle of a quantitative portfolio approach, is not it? This reduces risks, and increases the profit potential! Well, suppose the risk reduction is possible, if you invest a much smaller amount. But how can this positively influence profit? C'mon... I do not see anything fundamentally new in terms of portfolio investment in the pulsar scheme! Also, more projects do not provide any guarantees for the success of projects. Easily 50% of the selected projects can fail. Investing is always a risk! No one will give you a guarantee of success of the project! The main purpose of various investment approaches is to minimize risks as much as possible. The devs decided that their approach is effective in this regard. I believe them, because the team is very experienced and knows what it does! Maybe you are right. In any case, I'm interested in the project and in the investment model. I will follow the development of the project. I wish good luck to everyone, both devs and future investors!  |
|
|
|
|
|
