Ridiculous to send signed message to recover hacked account.

[Dorkie]

Don't you think it is ridiculous that the one and only way to recover a hacked account is to send a signed message with your bitcoin address (thus removing bitcoin's anonymity feature by identifying the owner of that bitcoin address to where he lives and which email address he uses) in order to have any chance of recovering it?

Shouldn't the website's server be able to trace the change in IP addresses used before and after an account is hacked?

I am a recent victim of account hack.

This was my original account here at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=180234 but now it is taken over by a Turkish hacker.

I never post any bitcoin address here because I never offer to sell anything here.

Does that mean my hacked account can never be recovered?

[1714572514]

1714572514

[1714572514]

1714572514

[1714572514]

1714572514

[hilariousetc]

Does that mean my hacked account can never be recovered?

At the current rate it's unlikely to be recovered. If you check the other threads in Meta even accounts with signed messages aren't getting restored or at best they have to wait weeks/months. Accounts could be restored by doing a bit of investigation on IPs etc but it's not foolproof and the forum currently doesn't have the manpower to do even that unfortunately.

On the new forum at least there will be multiple 2FA options to secure your account but I know that doesn't help you right now.

[Dorkie]

Does that mean my hacked account can never be recovered?

At the current rate it's unlikely to be recovered. If you check the other threads in Meta even accounts with signed messages aren't getting restored or at best they have to wait weeks/months. Accounts could be restored by doing a bit of investigation on IPs etc but it's not foolproof and the forum currently doesn't have the manpower unfortunately.

If that's the case, then by right my account should have extremely high chance of recovery if the admin care enough to look into the IP addresses used.

I don't understand why email address can be changed/edited.

If it is a security vulnerability, then by right it shouldn't allowed to be edited.

This would probably have prevented a majority of all the hacking, but why isn't the admin doing it?

[Lauda]

The only thing ridiculous in this thread is your naivety and knowledge. There is a very good reason for which signed messages are being asked for account recovery.

I don't understand why email address can be changed/edited.

Pretty much every service online allows you to do that.

If it is a security vulnerability, then by right it shouldn't allowed to be edited.

It is not.

This would probably have prevented a majority of all the hacking, but why isn't the admin doing it?

.useMethod.preventHacks(IamLeet) Sigh, people.

[Dorkie]

The only thing ridiculous in this thread is your naivety and knowledge. There is a very good reason for which signed messages are being asked for account recovery.

I don't understand why email address can be changed/edited.

Pretty much every service online allows you to do that.

This would probably have prevented a majority of all the hacking, but why isn't the admin doing it?

.useMethod.preventHacks(IamLeet) Sigh, people.

If you have nothing to help, please get lost.

1. You are naive to think everyone should post their bitcoin address here, and be stacked.
2. I can give more than 1 online service that does not allow email to be changed/edited, but that serves no purpose trying to prove an idiot wrong.
3. Sigh, people exactly like you should not even exist.

By the way, your comment is not appreciated here.
If you have nothing to offer, please mind your own business.
If you try to prove how smart or how wise you are, you have just failed.

And whether I am smart or wise or otherwise is none of your business.
Because I am here trying to solve my problem.
If you cannot help, at least don't be a parasite.

[Lauda]

1. You are naive to think everyone should post their bitcoin address here, and be stacked.

That has literally nothing to do with naivety. If you don't value and works towards your own security, then you should feel the consequences of your own actions.

2. I can give more than 1 online service that does not allow email to be changed/edited, but that serves no purpose trying to prove an idiot wrong.

I've explicitly used the wording 'pretty much' and not 'all', but you seem too fond of your fallacies to come up with an actual counter argument.

3. Sigh, people exactly like you should not even exist.

Looks like someone doesn't like uncomfortable truths.

And whether I am smart or wise or otherwise is none of your business.
Because I am here trying to solve my problem.

Let me shorten it into layman terms for you, had you not been a idiot and (allegedly) wasted your time with shitcoins, then this would already have been solved (or never happened to begin with). I am not surprised that you couldn't sacrifice 30 seconds of your *valuable* time to secure your account.

If you cannot help, at least don't be a parasite.

I can, by tagging the account thus rendering it *almost useless*. However, I am absolutely in no way convinced that you are the original owner. No address = no help from anyone other than potentially admins. IP matches are more often not proof of anything.

[Dorkie]

1. You are naive to think everyone should post their bitcoin address here, and be stacked.

That has literally nothing to do with naivety. If you don't value and works towards your own security, then you should feel the consequences of your own actions.

2. I can give more than 1 online service that does not allow email to be changed/edited, but that serves no purpose trying to prove an idiot wrong.

I've explicitly used the wording 'pretty much' and not 'all', but you seem too fond of your fallacies to come up with an actual counter argument.

3. Sigh, people exactly like you should not even exist.

Smells like someone doesn't like uncomfortable truths.

And whether I am smart or wise or otherwise is none of your business.
Because I am here trying to solve my problem.

Let me shorten it into layman terms for you, had you not been an (alleged) idiot and wasted your time with shitcoin, then this would already have been solved (or never happened to begin with). I am not surprised that you couldn't sacrifice 30 seconds of your *valuable* time to secure your account.

If you cannot help, at least don't be a parasite.

I can, by tagging the account thus rendering it *almost useless*. However, I am absolutely in no way convinced that you are the original owner.

You are wrong. Thinking that everyone should post their bitcoin addresses here and be stacked is 100% naive.
You fail to understand not everyone will have a bitcoin, and even if he/she does, doesn't mean he/she should post the address here for recovery purpose.
You are trying to imply that posting bitcoin address here is the one and only way to solve account hacking, which is why you are naive.

What uncomfortable truth are you talking about? I bet I welcome more painful truths than you can.

You have no other way to be convinced other than to receive a signed message from a stacked bitcoin address. Pathetic.

Let me shorten it into layman terms for you, had you not been an (alleged) idiot and wasted your time with shitcoin, then this would already have been solved (or never happened to begin with). I am not surprised that you couldn't sacrifice 30 seconds of your *valuable* time to secure your account.

I believe you are the idiot wasting time with shitcoin.
Sorry, but not me.

You try to show that you are trying to help by posting this garbage

.useMethod.preventHacks(IamLeet) Huh Sigh, people.

that you expect me to understand.
If you are sincerely good, then stop beating around the bushes.

[Lauda]

You are wrong. Thinking that everyone should post their bitcoin addresses here and be stacked is 100% naive.

No.

You fail to understand not everyone will have a bitcoin, and even if he/she does, doesn't mean he/she should post the address here for recovery purpose.

If you don't have a Bitcoin address, go away.

You are trying to imply that posting bitcoin address here is the one and only way to solve account hacking, which is why you are naive.

Is not something that I have implied / is something you've made up / you're a liar.

What uncomfortable truth are you talking about? I bet I welcome more painful truths than you can.

You have no other way to be convinced other than to receive a signed message from a stacked bitcoin address. Pathetic.
....
I believe you are the idiot wasting time with shitcoin.
Sorry, but not me.

The more you post, the more inconsistency I see. Then again, this behavior is often found with people involved in the shitcoin section and their delusions which derive value out of nothing. I do wonder if you actually are who you claim to be.

You try to show that you are trying to help by posting this garbage

.useMethod.preventHacks(IamLeet) Huh Sigh, people.

that you expect me to understand.
If you are sincerely good, then stop beating around the bushes.

There's a very good reason for which that was posted -> you've failed. Are you really unable to provide any proof whatsoever that you're the original owner?
Disclaimers:
There were cases of people attempting to hijack accounts by claiming they were hacked (recent, aTriz).
I wouldn't be surprised if there were cases of sold accounts being recovered by claiming they were hacked.

[Dorkie]

Here is how shitty and unhelpful your comments are.

The only thing ridiculous in this thread is your naivety and knowledge. There is a very good reason for which signed messages are being asked for account recovery.  Calling me naive is your personal subjective opinion. Not helpful to solving the problem.

I don't understand why email address can be changed/edited.

Pretty much every service online allows you to do that.  Another subjective opinion. Not helpful to solve the problem.

If it is a security vulnerability, then by right it shouldn't allowed to be edited.

It is not.  Stupid idiot. It is a vulnerability.

This would probably have prevented a majority of all the hacking, but why isn't the admin doing it?

.useMethod.preventHacks(IamLeet) Sigh, people.  Garbage post by a garbage intellect. Not helping to solve the problem.

Like I keep saying, please be helpful.

If you can't, then please stop wasting your time on me.
I am sure you are a smart fella.
I am sure you have more serious things to do elsewhere.
So, begone.

[Lauda]

Like I keep saying, please be helpful.

I am. However, given your way of conducting I see no reason to serve you potential solutions on a platter. Therefore, I'm pushing you towards the direction that you need to be going. Instead of writing nonsense, and making complaints, use your head and think:

Are you really unable to provide any proof whatsoever that you're the original owner?

This shouldn't take a few minutes of tinkering to figure out if you can answer with or without proof. I'll jump start you: think about the contents of your PMs.

I am sure you have more serious things to do elsewhere.
So, begone.

I can't. You've poked my cat.

[Lauda]

That isn't helping you. You're wasting your time by not thinking about the solution.

Are you really unable to provide any proof whatsoever that you're the original owner?

This shouldn't take a few minutes of tinkering to figure out if you can answer with or without proof. I'll jump start you: think about the contents of your PMs.

[Dorkie]

Like I keep saying, please be helpful.

I am. However, given your way of conducting I see no reason to serve you potential solutions on a platter. Therefore, I'm pushing you towards the direction that you need to be going. Instead of writing nonsense, and making complaints, use your head and think:  Please look at your own way of conducting, and try to figure out why I treat you the way I did. That will give you some wisdom. Don't always argue you are right, even though you are wrong. I may be wrong in your opinion, but for you to be impolite and insulting is not going to help anyone.

Are you really unable to provide any proof whatsoever that you're the original owner?

This shouldn't take a few minutes of tinkering to figure out if you can answer with or without proof. I'll jump start you: think about the contents of your PMs.  I don't send bitcoin addresses in PM.

I am sure you have more serious things to do elsewhere.
So, begone.

I can't. You've poked my cat.   Then let's do it. Give me your best shot. Scum. As far as I can tell, you are the one inviting an argument.

It is very clear to me that you cannot help me.

No, my PM is so fresh with this account it is almost clean. There is no bitcoin address used in my PM.

[Lauda]

It is very clear to me that you cannot help me.

Had you been reading what I was writing, instead of focusing replying, you'd know that this has already been mentioned. There are two people that might be able to help you, if you are unable to provide anything substantial that is considered evidence here.

No, my PM is so fresh with this account it is almost clean. There is no bitcoin address used in my PM.

I am talking about the account Dorky, which is quite old. Do you mean to imply that you've not used any altcoin address via PM? PGP key? DOX?

[Dorkie]

It is very clear to me that you cannot help me.

Had you been reading what I was writing, instead of focusing replying, you'd know that this has already been mentioned. There are two people that might be able to help you, if you are unable to provide anything substantial that is considered evidence here.

No, my PM is so fresh with this account it is almost clean. There is no bitcoin address used in my PM.

I am talking about the account Dorky, which is quite old. Do you mean to imply that you've not used any altcoin address via PM? PGP key? DOX?

Have you been directly straight to the point, we would not have wasted time on petty argument resulted from your false intellect.

I know 2 people, as past victims mentioned, Theymos and Cyrus.

Like I keep saying, I posted NO addresses here and in my PM. That shole hacker might even delete all my old PMs if he is reading this. I don't understand why do you even think that's effective.

The only 2 persons that I can think of that can 100% confidently vouch for me are my fellow forum members that I posted to them discussing about some of your so-called "shitcoin" (you might as well say Vitalik is the father of shitcoins since Ethereum is the origin of most of them).

I only posted some Bible verses in my signature. Now the asshole hacker replaced it with some Genesis Vision bounty signature.

[Dorkie]

Moderator, why is this person's comment that I am an idiot that wasted time on shitcoins be allowed to remain without deletion?

1. Please specify why I am an idiot.
2. Please specify which coin is a shitcoin and why is that so.
3. Please specify how identifying that I am an idiot that wasted time on shitcoins will help solve my problem.

If this Lauda person cannot even furnish any explanation, then why is such insults remain without deletion?

And whether I am smart or wise or otherwise is none of your business.
Because I am here trying to solve my problem.

Let me shorten it into layman terms for you, had you not been a idiot and (allegedly) wasted your time with shitcoins, then this would already have been solved (or never happened to begin with). I am not surprised that you couldn't sacrifice 30 seconds of your *valuable* time to secure your account.

[Dorkie]

I understand the reason why a signed message from bitcoin address is a valid way to recover a hacked account.
I am no idiot on the reason why.
The only reason why I said this is ridiculous is because such method is the one and only method accepted to validate an account, which if a member never posted any address, not from bitcoin not from any altcoin and not from any shitcoin, then his hacked account is as good as 100% guaranteed gone.
This is the reason why I said it is ridiculous, certainly has absolutely nothing to do with naivety.
Come to think of this, how did businesses recover stolen/hacked account before the time of blockchain?
Can we say ALL accounts that got stolen/hacked before the existence of the blockchain were 100% not recoverable?
Surely if we think signed message from bitcoin address is the one and only solution is itself not a form of naivety, then I don't know what is.
And while some hacker can fake being hacked (nothing can leave the human imagination), we should also be clear that a person may be a genuine victim of a hack despite posting no bitcoin address.
Although it would be very hard to prove the victim is genuinely a victim, the fact that the whole investigation rely solely on signed bitcoin messages is itself ridiculous.
If the email address cannot be edited, then any hacked account would not be permanent as the rightful owner can simply request for a new password recovery.
If the email address can be edited, then complications arise, thus requiring signed bitcoin messages.
If we are worried that the user might lose his email too, then the forum can do 2nd validation through the user's phone.
If we are worried the user might lose his email, lose his phone and his account gets hacked all at the same time, then I believe that would be sheer bad luck.
It would be as bad luck as stacking a bitcoin address here but the user can't send signed message because he happen to lose his wallet/private key too.
The person that accuse me of being naive is outright insulting and not helping even a tiny.

[Lauda]

Like I keep saying, I posted NO addresses here and in my PM. That shole hacker might even delete all my old PMs if he is reading this. I don't understand why do you even think that's effective.

You persist with making assumptions when you clearly lack adequate knowledge about this forum. If you delete your PM, it is not gone. The other party still has it, thus it remains in the database. If both parties delete the PM, then it still likely to be found in a backup. However, accessing these backups is hard and time consuming. Therefore, theymos would not likely do it for some random account.

The only 2 persons that I can think of that can 100% confidently vouch for me are my fellow forum members that I posted to them discussing about some of your so-called "shitcoin" (you might as well say Vitalik is the father of shitcoins since Ethereum is the origin of most of them).

Vitalik is a corporate sellout/idiot, yes.

Moderator, why is this person's comment that I am an idiot that wasted time on shitcoins be allowed to remain without deletion?

The posts are on-topic. Ironically, now you're the one who is breaking the forum rules.

The only reason why I said this is ridiculous is because such method is the one and only method accepted to validate an account, which if a member never posted any address, not from bitcoin not from any altcoin and not from any shitcoin, then his hacked account is as good as 100% guaranteed gone.

There's nothing wrong with that. Actions have consequences, and consequences tend to be nice lessons when you fail to educate yourself on time. There's some much irony in here that it's almost funny.

[Dorkie]

Why do you think I would know everything about this forum, just as why do you think you would know everything about my argument?
I will only know everything about this forum if I am the webmaster at the very least.
You would know a little bit more about me if you stop all your childish attitudes.

Vitalik is a corporate sellout/idiot, yes.

If you think bitcoin is itself not a shitcoin, then you are seriously more naive than you can ever realize.
If you think bitcoin and the rest are all shitcoin, then I suppose you have a mission here.
If you want to bark, make sure to bark at the right tree.

The posts are on-topic. Ironically, now you're the one who is breaking the forum rules.

I am amazed that calling me an idiot that wasted time on unspecified shitcoin is on-topic.
If I were to do the same on you, my comment would have been deleted.
Yes, I understand the inherent bias in every human.
You think you are objective?
Of course you can say you are, just like everyone else does.
But then you would actually earn my respect if you admit that you are not, which is actually a challenge for people of your kind.

There's nothing wrong with that. Actions have consequences, and consequences tend to be nice lessons when you fail to educate yourself on time. There's some much irony in here that it's almost funny.

There is nothing wrong with requiring signed bitcoin messages as a solution.
There is everything wrong if legitimacy is totally dependent only on one single solution (as if there is no other solution that humans cannot think of).

You obviously have a challenge in understanding simple points of argument.
I am sorry.

[Lauda]

Why do you think I would know everything about this forum, just as why do you think you would know everything about my argument?

You apparently know nothing about it and are most definitely not capable of knowing everything, thus I doubt anyone would think that to begin with.

There is everything wrong if legitimacy is totally dependent only on one single solution (as if there is no other solution that humans cannot think of).

Completely incorrect assumption and statement. Continuing to derail this thread isn't going to help you come to solution either. Then again, bagholding all that garbage must be painful.
How much time have you spent writing these replies?

[Dorkie]

I believe I have already made my points clear.
If you still fail to understand any of my points, its your own defect.
You may continue with your pathetic bickering, trying hard to impress me.
But only because you think I care.

Yeah, you are right. It is painful holding 1 losing garbage out of........... 4 winners.
I was hoping I would have all 5 winners. Too bad.

If you know that there is no way I know everything about this forum, then why even bother figuring out if I do?
Nonsense.

Why do you think I would know everything about this forum, just as why do you think you would know everything about my argument?

You apparently know nothing about it and are most definitely not capable of knowing everything, thus I doubt anyone would think that to begin with.

There is everything wrong if legitimacy is totally dependent only on one single solution (as if there is no other solution that humans cannot think of).

Completely incorrect assumption and statement. Continuing to derail this thread isn't going to help you come to solution either. Then again, bagholding all that garbage must be painful.
How much time have you spent writing these replies?

A stupid person may spend many minutes (if not hours or days) writing what I write.
For a natural like me (go check out my Dorky old posts), it comes naturally to me.

Lol, not capable of knowing everything.
I bet your comment is very on-topic.

Continuing to derail this thread?
If you were not born into this world, I bet this thread would have done fine.

I can confidently say you are very much off topic.
I can bet the moderator will do nothing about your comment.
I can bet I will be proven right.

Edit:
Please bear in mind that you are now engaging in personal attacks.

Edit #2:
If you want to know what it means to be helpful, you can learn from "hilarious", the first person to reply to this thread.
He was very helpful, informative, and to the point.
I was actually going somewhere with his input, until a jackass (you) appeared and spoiled (and continue to do so) everything.