Lauda gave negative feedback for no valid reason

[Aventhe]

read below . that one is from a long time ago. i only used this account in 2011, 2016 and now. if you could find one from 2016 i may be able to sign , but my old addresses from 2011 are destroyed

HAHAHAHA! This guy is a joke 

The address he 'doesnt have access to' because it is destroyed has 1.4 BTC attached to it. https://blockchain.info/address/12wDRLTdLcjxWRBm4pXT1G3sXb5aoqfaVa

Don't tell me that you just don't have access anymore to 7,700 USD worth of funds? If so, I envy you for being that rich that you can just loose that much money without caring about it.

Unless......

[1714158330]

1714158330

[1714158330]

1714158330

[cripperz]

read below . that one is from a long time ago. i only used this account in 2011, 2016 and now. if you could find one from 2016 i may be able to sign , but my old addresses from 2011 are destroyed

HAHAHAHA! This guy is a joke 

The address he 'doesnt have access to' because it is destroyed has 1.4 BTC attached to it. https://blockchain.info/address/12wDRLTdLcjxWRBm4pXT1G3sXb5aoqfaVa

Don't tell me that you just don't have access anymore to 7,700 USD worth of funds? If so, I envy you for being that rich that you can just loose that much money without caring about it.

Unless......

you never heard of cold storage ?

[Lauda]

you never heard of cold storage ?

Cold storage = destroyed

read below . that one is from a long time ago. i only used this account in 2011, 2016 and now. if you could find one from 2016 i may be able to sign , but my old addresses from 2011 are destroyed

[cripperz]

you never heard of cold storage ?

Cold storage = destroyed

read below . that one is from a long time ago. i only used this account in 2011, 2016 and now. if you could find one from 2016 i may be able to sign , but my old addresses from 2011 are destroyed

you obviously have some thing to lean about keeping btc

i will not waste my time to explain, ask an other old member

Edit: i would explain only if you neutral the trust

[Lauda]

It seems that the feedback is very much warranted, and unless supplied with a signed message other DT members should follow.

[cripperz]

It seems that the feedback is very much warranted, and unless supplied with a signed message other DT members should follow.

Not everything is always as it seems...

[aTriz]

It seems that the feedback is very much warranted, and unless supplied with a signed message other DT members should follow.

Not everything is always as it seems...

The words of a defeated man.

[Lauda]

It seems that the feedback is very much warranted, and unless supplied with a signed message other DT members should follow.

Not everything is always as it seems...

I doubt it. I've seen a lot of hacked, purchased accounts promoting that ICO anyways.

[actmyname]

i think that had negative concept so for that reason lauda given to a negative feedaback otherwise lauda is not give to positive feedback.

What the fuck are you doing? You're not even trying at all with your shitposts. This is incomprehensible garbage that has nothing to do with anything.Are you so excited to hop into a signature campaign that you'll just crappily increase your activity? Clearly, you have some knowledge of the forum as you immediately hop into the Reputation threads; given the English skills, I'd assume that your main/old account had been banned and now you're trying to work your way back up. Badly.

If I had a bitcoin for every time you posted something incoherent, I'd have 15 bitcoins.