Democracy or Dictator ship ?

[Kotone]

If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.

Dictatorship should never be in the discussion of bringing countries to progress as this is not the way to go and it comes with a price like freedom and nlood. Dictators succeed on the putside because dissenters get imprisoned or worse killed and their plans enacted. Which have a high cost that is not the price for progress.

[In the silence]

Both are good, democracy's flaw is manipulation of opinions to affect decisions. Dicatatorship's flaw is lack of leadership affecting the people.
But for me dictatorship is.

[Pretty Boy]

When it comes to the welfare of all the citizens then I would pick Democracy than Dictatorship. Dictatorship is not all bad but the point is what if the Dictator is like some bad leaders who only cared about themselves and not their own citizens.

[Jaydeepjani]

Democracy for sure . It's of the people for the people and by the people and so it is the people who chose and the people who get the power . Its utmost important

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

Democracy for sure . It's of the people for the people and by the people and so it is the people who chose and the people who get the power . Its utmost important

The problem is that most people don't know what they are talking about, but keep talking. Democracy isn't really different from peer pressure or a group of bullies that you can't do anything against. It's pretty close to just having a single dictator and gets romanticized way too much.

[Renzyp]

Money can buy anything yes! But not happiness Ye let say this your happy because you can buy any material thing you like ! But until when?

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

Money can buy anything yes! But not happiness Ye let say this your happy because you can buy any material thing you like ! But until when?

Wrong thread?

[kryptopath]

If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.

Benefits of a Dictatorship
As referenced earlier, elections are imperfect things.  While the majority of a population is represented, there is always going to be a portion of the population that is not. 

The tyranny of the majority wiki is a good read:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.

Benefits of a Dictatorship
As referenced earlier, elections are imperfect things.  While the majority of a population is represented, there is always going to be a portion of the population that is not. 

The tyranny of the majority wiki is a good read:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority

Nice to see someone on here gets the problem.

[kendra1107]

If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.

Definitely democracy..Yes this is lenient compared to a dictatorship form of government wherein almost everything is controlled. But the same is still true with democracy. I don’t think that a military form of government would be ideal in our country today since our people are much more defensive compared before.

[soros017]

Democracy is not perfect, but over history dictatorship has been proven to be much worse.
I'm not so sure how a totally libertarian society would be, but I guess the transition would be slow, and until then, democracy is the best thing we have.

[croTek4]

First, true democracy doesn't exist. Just look at USA, it's not a democracy, it's more of a representative democracy, like, you elect a guy who will then make his own vote for the president. So, the president isn't actually elected by the people, but instead, by 50 old politicians.

Secondly, dictatorship isn't as bad as we think: sometimes, it's better to give all the power to one person, as long as this person has insight and common sense. I'd like to live under the reign of a Gandhi-like dictator. I wouldn't mind giving the lead of a whole country to such a guy.
Sometimes, even a bad dictator is better than a lazy democracy. Syria stands as a good example, in my humble opinion

[Sithara007]

First, true democracy doesn't exist. Just look at USA, it's not a democracy, it's more of a representative democracy, like, you elect a guy who will then make his own vote for the president. So, the president isn't actually elected by the people, but instead, by 50 old politicians.

The American system is a little bit complex. It is a true democracy, but the presidential elections are conducted in such a way that even the smallest state gets its say on the matters. If the election was conducted solely based on the popular vote, then no one will be campaigning in states such as Wyoming and Vermont. That is why they have the electoral vote system.

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

First, true democracy doesn't exist. Just look at USA, it's not a democracy, it's more of a representative democracy, like, you elect a guy who will then make his own vote for the president. So, the president isn't actually elected by the people, but instead, by 50 old politicians.

The American system is a little bit complex. It is a true democracy, but the presidential elections are conducted in such a way that even the smallest state gets its say on the matters. If the election was conducted solely based on the popular vote, then no one will be campaigning in states such as Wyoming and Vermont. That is why they have the electoral vote system.

It's not a true democracy. Not even on paper due to the existence of the electoral college. And in reality it doesn't matter who's inside the WH.

[Renzyp]

Democracy for me is the best to the country that people fallow the policy  strictly becouse we have freedom , but other country of Dictator ship is very dangerous to those who cannot fallow the policy!

[Sithara007]

It's not a true democracy. Not even on paper due to the existence of the electoral college. And in reality it doesn't matter who's inside the WH.

Why not? I have studied the electoral college system in the United States and I could say that it is having both positives and negatives. But it is better than some of the other systems. As I told you earlier, one of the advantages with this system is that it gives voice to the sparsely populated states.

[BADecker]

It's not a true democracy. Not even on paper due to the existence of the electoral college. And in reality it doesn't matter who's inside the WH.

Why not? I have studied the electoral college system in the United States and I could say that it is having both positives and negatives. But it is better than some of the other systems. As I told you earlier, one of the advantages with this system is that it gives voice to the sparsely populated states.

But it is still dictatorship with a few twists. Why? Because:
1. The majority rules, which means the majority is dictator over the minority;
2. The majority simply decides who the popular leaders will be;
3. Then the leaders make their rulings and laws and statutes;
4. Then the leaders turn the responsibility of turning the rulings, laws, and statutes into codes, which are interpretations made by the code writers;
5. Then the enforcers interpret the codes even differently, in whatever ways they feel they want to.

The enforcers are the cops and judges in the courts, and usually the lower courts. The way they interpret may not at all be the way that the winning majority wanted in the first place, or even what the popular leaders thought they had passed into law.

The result is that we have an anarchistic dictatorship. The cops and judges are the dictators.

[saenko]

If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.

The main thing is not what he preaches politics, but how he does and what people feel at the same time. Personally, it is important that I and all people live in a normal society and can afford all the essentials, rather than survive in the state with corruption and the complete absence of government as an organ.

[popcorn1]

from the independent news paper ..
It's comment section from someone called AVIL

The EU might reduce the divorce bill for now but will claim elsewhere later on.  This is how you become creative and deceive people.  In the end the UK will pay what the EU demands or they will make you suffer.

I think the EU will suffer way way more than the UK ..

I fancy making new cars like 21st century cars made by the UK ..
I fancy making new planes 21st century ones made by the UK
and countries who want to join in making the new super planes ..

Lets just get one thing straight we BRITISH sit down and think the inventions we will make will
be shit hot and everyone will want one ..

I look at the shapes and i see better shapes  ..

MRS MAY you get us OUT NOW ..NO DEAL ..
They are asking for way to much and i don't want a deal i want to show them how good we are at
building a 21ST CENTURY UK..

WE THE PUBLIC KNOW WE HAVE BEEN SLAVES FOR FAR TO LONG..

Food banks because you like lining lord twat faces pockets..

Explain how do people go to Europe if they need to go to food banks?..

Oh i know LONDON TWATS jump on a train for £100 while the rest go to food banks
Oh and beg people for 50P to make a phone call to try and get through to UNIVERSAL CREDIT..

Greece doing bad
Italy doing bad
france doing bad
Spain doing bad
Hungry and Poland want nothing to do with the EU .

And the rest besides germany and holland i don't even know who they are ..
No i do i was joking but not really known around the world..

I want out of the ERT European round table elite who have a hold on all our lives ..

LIKE TESCO telling me how to live and what to buy and what to use and all their products ..

You do understand business?..

5 phones on the markets or 50 phones on the markets..

The EU wants us to have 5 and they are their phones and nobody else's that we have to buy..
If 50 phones we will get 1 just as good if not better but way cheaper
More competition means cheaper ..

BUT the competition is gone but they make you think it's still there when it's not..
European round table have sowed all the business up..

If you notice the only ones that benefit are the major cities only the rest get swept under the carpet
like dust on the ground..

OH there is some shit holes sweep them under the carpet ALL OVER THE WORLD..

The EU is taking the competition away and then promote CAPITALISM ..
yes for them not for the little people..

Elizabeth Warren CRUSHES BIG Pharma Executive Lori Reilly "you ...
Video for Elizabeth warren crushes big pharma▶ 11:19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtStmOFO8qs
9 hours ago - Uploaded by Rolando Velasquez
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren questions Pharma Executive Vice President for Policy Lori Reilly ..

THE USA home of CAPITALISM but is it really competition or capitalism for the few ^^^^^^
Watch video and you will see what happens in business ..

WE the planet are sick of greedy bastards ..

Want to sail the world        buy a rubber dinghy greedy fuckers ..

[GuppyMan]

I stand for the democratic way of the country's development. However, if someone likes to live under the leadership of a dictator and their life suits, then why not?