✅|ANN| 🌍DESIRE |NeoScrypt| |🔨MasterNodes🔨| - COIN OF YOUR DREAMS!

[BeachMiner18]

Here's my two cents.  DSR was my first Masternode and I was super excited about getting everything up and running and seeing my rewards trickle in every two days.  Then as I began to do more research across the crypto space I started to realize that all of the things people were advising with regard to scam coins was present with Desire - the coin of your nightmares.  I could never get a clear view on who was really running things other than a screen name of "Lazy_Boozer".  This joker disappeared for a while while some of his cronies stayed behind and kept spewing their "to the moon" bullshit and would act like complete assholes towards anyone who dared speak ill of the direction of the project (or lack thereof) or the absent dev.  After about two month of running masternodes and seeing no sign of communication from what appeared to be the one and only dev, I bailed out at a 93% loss to my investment. Fortunately the folks at Gravium came along to at least allow people who had invested in the DSR scam to have a place to start over. Maybe Gravium will never become anything, but I would rather place the 7% of what was left from my investment in DSR in to the hands of a group of people who are at least trying to make something happen.  If you like to give money to crooks then definitely stay with DSR.

[stevascha]

so should i swap to GRV? need advice

BR

[vamp8]

Here's my two cents.  DSR was my first Masternode and I was super excited about getting everything up and running and seeing my rewards trickle in every two days.  Then as I began to do more research across the crypto space I started to realize that all of the things people were advising with regard to scam coins was present with Desire - the coin of your nightmares.  I could never get a clear view on who was really running things other than a screen name of "Lazy_Boozer".  This joker disappeared for a while while some of his cronies stayed behind and kept spewing their "to the moon" bullshit and would act like complete assholes towards anyone who dared speak ill of the direction of the project (or lack thereof) or the absent dev.  After about two month of running masternodes and seeing no sign of communication from what appeared to be the one and only dev, I bailed out at a 93% loss to my investment. Fortunately the folks at Gravium came along to at least allow people who had invested in the DSR scam to have a place to start over. Maybe Gravium will never become anything, but I would rather place the 7% of what was left from my investment in DSR in to the hands of a group of people who are at least trying to make something happen.  If you like to give money to crooks then definitely stay with DSR.

Oтдaй мнe))) ecли тeбe тaк гopит кoмy либo oтдaть))Бpeд пишитe или в нaтype дypoчки Пpoдaйтe ecли дepжaть нe xoтитe, a вы в нoвoe дepьмo лeзeтe))

[OrangeAgent]

so should i swap to GRV? need advice

BR

I would say yes. DSR was also my first MN and boy how do I regret it. Lost a bunch of money on it. And not because crypto is high risk, but because the dev is like his name implies, a lazy boozer.
Owning tons of DSR he manipulated everything. He is never active, it's just now that his shitty project is threatend he is back.

Swap your old DSR to GRV. You'll be happy you did.

[Crypto_Monk]

so should i swap to GRV? need advice

BR

DSR is only being swapped if it was in your wallet before the 1 May. It will be rejected if you try to send from an exchange after this date.

[Alex68]

Well, some historical facts:
- DSR code was the most stable from the beginning compare to the "sisters" Neoscrypt coins: VIVO and INN;
- DSR developers were the first to migrate to sentinel with less bugs;
- DSR team was the first to release sentinel for Win and sentinel for Linux without crontab;
- DSR was the first to release Android wallet.
Yes, DSR price did not reach as high as "sisters" during the end of 2017, but this is not due to any technical problems. I can understand when the developer is not a social person by his character, but rather will work on the code quietly. Traders and investors are more impulsive and often buy on buzz and promises, they demand "communication".
At the moment DSR is bleeding price wise, but is strong technically - a clear buy signal.
Dumping sentiment is not a surprise, as all the crypto market is bleeding. Once overall bleeding will stop, DSR price will recover very well.

[Crypto_Monk]

Well, some historical facts:
- DSR code was the most stable from the beginning compare to the "sisters" Neoscrypt coins: VIVO and INN;
- DSR developers were the first to migrate to sentinel with less bugs;
- DSR team was the first to release sentinel for Win and sentinel for Linux without crontab;
- DSR was the first to release Android wallet.
Yes, DSR price did not reach as high as "sisters" during the end of 2017, but this is not due to any technical problems. I can understand when the developer is not a social person by his character, but rather will work on the code quietly. Traders and investors are more impulsive and often buy on buzz and promises, they demand "communication".
At the moment DSR is bleeding price wise, but is strong technically - a clear buy signal.
Dumping sentiment is not a surprise, as all the crypto market is bleeding. Once overall bleeding will stop, DSR price will recover very well.

Please be aware that Lazy Boozer is not a coder, he paid people to do his work for him. He is the only one holding all the cards with dsr, including over 1M coins.

This is not a community coin, nor a decentralised coin. 1 man controlling everything is a dictatorship and you have been warned in this thread many times.

Also, on the note of the code... The blockchain stops releasing blocks for 15min-3hrs at a time then will release 15-25 blocks within 2 minutes. This is not a stable platform!

[lazy_boozer]

Well, some historical facts:
- DSR code was the most stable from the beginning compare to the "sisters" Neoscrypt coins: VIVO and INN;
- DSR developers were the first to migrate to sentinel with less bugs;
- DSR team was the first to release sentinel for Win and sentinel for Linux without crontab;
- DSR was the first to release Android wallet.
Yes, DSR price did not reach as high as "sisters" during the end of 2017, but this is not due to any technical problems. I can understand when the developer is not a social person by his character, but rather will work on the code quietly. Traders and investors are more impulsive and often buy on buzz and promises, they demand "communication".
At the moment DSR is bleeding price wise, but is strong technically - a clear buy signal.
Dumping sentiment is not a surprise, as all the crypto market is bleeding. Once overall bleeding will stop, DSR price will recover very well.

Please be aware that Lazy Boozer is not a coder, he paid people to do his work for him. He is the only one holding all the cards with dsr, including over 1M coins.

This is not a community coin, nor a decentralised coin. 1 man controlling everything is a dictatorship and you have been warned in this thread many times.

Also, on the note of the code... The blockchain stops releasing blocks for 15min-3hrs at a time then will release 15-25 blocks within 2 minutes. This is not a stable platform!

Do not let empty rumors and mislead people!

At first!

Desire is my project, I did all the work with the source code. I launch this project from scratch, without having the money to develop it and advance it.

The fact that I hired people to develop third-party services and applications I think is no secret to anyone.
By the way, some of them did not justify the money i paid for it.

Secondly!

In occasion of a premine. Your words about 1 million coins!
To date, the remainder of the premine is about 580,000 coins.
The rest is spent on the development and promotion of the project. Only listing for all exchanges cost me about 150,000 coins.

In occasion of increase of complexity and delay of blocks!
You better get acquainted with the technical nuances of mining and not write nonsense. 

Specially for you the link, study at leisure!

https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5072/what-is-pool-hopping

It's ridiculous to look at you and other people who watered Desire with shit, spread rumors and confuse other people. 

[lazy_boozer]

Well, some historical facts:
- DSR code was the most stable from the beginning compare to the "sisters" Neoscrypt coins: VIVO and INN;
- DSR developers were the first to migrate to sentinel with less bugs;
- DSR team was the first to release sentinel for Win and sentinel for Linux without crontab;
- DSR was the first to release Android wallet.
Yes, DSR price did not reach as high as "sisters" during the end of 2017, but this is not due to any technical problems. I can understand when the developer is not a social person by his character, but rather will work on the code quietly. Traders and investors are more impulsive and often buy on buzz and promises, they demand "communication".
At the moment DSR is bleeding price wise, but is strong technically - a clear buy signal.
Dumping sentiment is not a surprise, as all the crypto market is bleeding. Once overall bleeding will stop, DSR price will recover very well.

Yes, we are sure that the price will definitely increase. After such growth, a significant drop in prices was inevitable, investors fix profits. In addition, the price reduction caused panic. This is normal on the crypto currency market, I compare it with other currencies that have shown a good price after the release, and then no. Over time, the profitability of these coins has only increased.

[Alex68]

Also, on the note of the code... The blockchain stops releasing blocks for 15min-3hrs at a time then will release 15-25 blocks within 2 minutes. This is not a stable platform!

This start-stop blockchain progress is a common issue for all Neoscrypt coins, not specific for DSR. Neoscrypt hash power is mostly coming from the Nicehash and is releasing in the bursts to mine a bunch of blocks and later wait (switch to another coin) until difficulty will drop.

[Alex68]

Well, some historical facts:
- DSR code was the most stable from the beginning compare to the "sisters" Neoscrypt coins: VIVO and INN;
- DSR developers were the first to migrate to sentinel with less bugs;
- DSR team was the first to release sentinel for Win and sentinel for Linux without crontab;
- DSR was the first to release Android wallet.
Yes, DSR price did not reach as high as "sisters" during the end of 2017, but this is not due to any technical problems. I can understand when the developer is not a social person by his character, but rather will work on the code quietly. Traders and investors are more impulsive and often buy on buzz and promises, they demand "communication".
At the moment DSR is bleeding price wise, but is strong technically - a clear buy signal.
Dumping sentiment is not a surprise, as all the crypto market is bleeding. Once overall bleeding will stop, DSR price will recover very well.

Yes, we are sure that the price will definitely increase. After such growth, a significant drop in prices was inevitable, investors fix profits. In addition, the price reduction caused panic. This is normal on the crypto currency market, I compare it with other currencies that have shown a good price after the release, and then no. Over time, the profitability of these coins has only increased.

Thank you for replying, lazy_boozer! Anyway haters are leaving and dropping coins super cheap. Scooping
DSR is technically developed well, good presence on exchanges, no major issues, just some minor social problems.
By the way, is there any idea to add staking for DSR? It may reduce effects of the mining pool hopping.

[lazy_boozer]

Well, some historical facts:
- DSR code was the most stable from the beginning compare to the "sisters" Neoscrypt coins: VIVO and INN;
- DSR developers were the first to migrate to sentinel with less bugs;
- DSR team was the first to release sentinel for Win and sentinel for Linux without crontab;
- DSR was the first to release Android wallet.
Yes, DSR price did not reach as high as "sisters" during the end of 2017, but this is not due to any technical problems. I can understand when the developer is not a social person by his character, but rather will work on the code quietly. Traders and investors are more impulsive and often buy on buzz and promises, they demand "communication".
At the moment DSR is bleeding price wise, but is strong technically - a clear buy signal.
Dumping sentiment is not a surprise, as all the crypto market is bleeding. Once overall bleeding will stop, DSR price will recover very well.

Yes, we are sure that the price will definitely increase. After such growth, a significant drop in prices was inevitable, investors fix profits. In addition, the price reduction caused panic. This is normal on the crypto currency market, I compare it with other currencies that have shown a good price after the release, and then no. Over time, the profitability of these coins has only increased.

Thank you for replying, lazy_boozer! Anyway haters are leaving and dropping coins super cheap. Scooping
DSR is technically developed well, good presence on exchanges, no major issues, just some minor social problems.
By the way, is there any idea to add staking for DSR? It may reduce effects of the mining pool hopping.

This will certainly help, but the POS has very significant disadvantages. Therefore, its implementation in our project is not considered.
PoolHoping is mainly a problem of low mining difficulty We have other ideas for correction, this is the fix of Difficulty Retarget Algorithm DGW.

[kamalsharma100]

DSR was the first to release Android wallet.

What benefit if it doesn't work?  It is useless.

[signofnero]

Why relaunched? For almost 1 month ago,DESIRE had been launched with X11 algorithm if I remember exactly.

[lazy_boozer]

DSR was the first to release Android wallet.

What benefit if it doesn't work?  It is useless.

Android wallet soon, on another platform, not on the electrum.

[Guardsman]

This will certainly help, but the POS has very significant disadvantages. Therefore, its implementation in our project is not considered.
PoolHoping is mainly a problem of low mining difficulty We have other ideas for correction, this is the fix of Difficulty Retarget Algorithm DGW.

And it seems to me that the implementation of the POS algorithm would encourage small holders of coins. It is clear that for those who can buy a masternode, they will not be interested in the POS, but none of this can do. Despite the fairly affordable price masternode today. All the same there are different investors.

[lazy_boozer]

This will certainly help, but the POS has very significant disadvantages. Therefore, its implementation in our project is not considered.
PoolHoping is mainly a problem of low mining difficulty We have other ideas for correction, this is the fix of Difficulty Retarget Algorithm DGW.

And it seems to me that the implementation of the POS algorithm would encourage small holders of coins. It is clear that for those who can buy a masternode, they will not be interested in the POS, but none of this can do. Despite the fairly affordable price masternode today. All the same there are different investors.

Yes it is. But we have another solution that is under development.

We are thinking about the implementation of multi-tariff MN. (term is 1 year, if the testing is successful)

1. MH 100 - 2%
2. MH 500 - 10%
3. MN 1000 - 20%
4. MN 5000 - 100%
5. MN 10000 - 200%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2272607.msg26151341#msg26151341

[thethunderbird]

This will certainly help, but the POS has very significant disadvantages. Therefore, its implementation in our project is not considered.
PoolHoping is mainly a problem of low mining difficulty We have other ideas for correction, this is the fix of Difficulty Retarget Algorithm DGW.

And it seems to me that the implementation of the POS algorithm would encourage small holders of coins. It is clear that for those who can buy a masternode, they will not be interested in the POS, but none of this can do. Despite the fairly affordable price masternode today. All the same there are different investors.

Yes it is. But we have another solution that is under development.

We are thinking about the implementation of multi-tariff MN. (term is 1 year, if the testing is successful)

1. MH 100 - 2%
2. MH 500 - 10%
3. MN 1000 - 20%
4. MN 5000 - 100%
5. MN 10000 - 200%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2272607.msg26151341#msg26151341

Lazy_bozer, I see you're still working on this project and trying to develop it, if you continue to do so, then Desire will keep standing and keep thriving,
for example, chain coin is a masternode project, its value is almost stable through the time and doesn't go down although it released more than 4 years ago. and although chain coin has no goal to achieve its marketcap now is about 2Million $ and this is because the team behind it is still updating it.
so Lazy_bozer don't give up and fight for your coin to survive, and one day it will reach 2 Million market cap or more.

[lazy_boozer]

This will certainly help, but the POS has very significant disadvantages. Therefore, its implementation in our project is not considered.
PoolHoping is mainly a problem of low mining difficulty We have other ideas for correction, this is the fix of Difficulty Retarget Algorithm DGW.

And it seems to me that the implementation of the POS algorithm would encourage small holders of coins. It is clear that for those who can buy a masternode, they will not be interested in the POS, but none of this can do. Despite the fairly affordable price masternode today. All the same there are different investors.

Yes it is. But we have another solution that is under development.

We are thinking about the implementation of multi-tariff MN. (term is 1 year, if the testing is successful)

1. MH 100 - 2%
2. MH 500 - 10%
3. MN 1000 - 20%
4. MN 5000 - 100%
5. MN 10000 - 200%

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2272607.msg26151341#msg26151341

Lazy_bozer, I see you're still working on this project and trying to develop it, if you continue to do so, then Desire will keep standing and keep thriving,
for example, chain coin is a masternode project, its value is almost stable through the time and doesn't go down although it released more than 4 years ago. and although chain coin has no goal to achieve its marketcap now is about 2Million $ and this is because the team behind it is still updating it.
so Lazy_bozer don't give up and fight for your coin to survive, and one day it will reach 2 Million market cap or more.

I know it and I understand it.

Now, many new people. in the cryptoworld,
which do not understand the mechanisms of market development and development.
They do not understand that development and promotion does not proceed as quickly as
they would like. Now, the bulk of the negative goes from those people who bought at the peak. But this is the market,
there was a big rise in prices of more than 3,000 percent.
Many people earn on growth, many people lose - these are the laws of the market. Crypto-currencies are still classified as high-yield and high-risk investments.

[lazy_boozer]

How to return coins stuck in a mobile wallet?

1. Click "show private address" in your mobile wallet.



2. Copy privat key adress.

3. Open console Desire Core wallet.



4. Enter importprivkey you_privat_key

5. Coins will appear on the wallet balance.