virtualmaster (OP)
|
|
June 07, 2013, 08:21:27 AM Last edit: June 08, 2013, 11:00:36 AM by virtualmaster |
|
Everybody is so scared about a 51% attack on the Bitcoin chain, but that would cost a lot of money for the attacker but there is another attack possibility from the authorities without any costs. Domain seizure. 35 domains seized in connection with Liberty Reserve money laundering. ABC-EX.NET ABSOLUTEXCHANGE.EU ALERTEXCHANGER.COM CENTREGOLD.CA DUYDUYCHANGER.COM E-NAIRA.COM EBUYGOLD.COM ECARDONE.COM EDEALSPOT.COM ELECTRUMX.COM ENTELNOVA.COM EPAYMONSTER.COM EXHERE.COM GETEMONEY.COM GOLDEXPAY.COM GOLDMEDIATOR.COM GOLDNAIRAEXCHANGE.COM INSTANTGOLDNG.COM INTEXCHANGE.COM JTGOLD.COM M-GOLD.COM MAGNETIC-EXCHANGE.COM MEWAHGOLD.COM MI-BILLETERA.COM MONEYEXCHANGE.VN NICCIEXCHANGE.COM NIGERIAGOLDEXCHANGER.COM SUPERCHANGE.RU TACOAUTHORIZED.COM TUKARDUID.COM UKRNETMONEY.COM VELAEXCHANGE.COM WEBMONEY.CO.NZ WM-CENTER.COM WMIRK.COM http://www.justice.gov/usao/nys/pressreleases/May13/LibertyReservePR.pdfSome domain seizures:. http://domainincite.com/3035-cops-seize-1800-domains-in-2010http://domainincite.com/6877-another-2000-uk-fraud-domains-taken-downLearn from Liberty Reserve. .bit domains cannot be seized.
|
|
|
|
raze
|
|
June 07, 2013, 09:00:07 AM |
|
Yeah, this would be a problem... If Bitcoin relied on domain names.
|
BTC --16FPbgyUZdTm1voAfi26VZ3RH7apTFGaPm LTC -- Lhd3gmj84BWqx7kQgqUA7gyoogsLeJbCXb PPC -- PRpKGjgjNLFv8eR7VVv7jBaP8aexDFqk4C
|
|
|
virtualmaster (OP)
|
|
June 07, 2013, 07:26:55 PM |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
|
|
|
|
Stampbit
|
|
June 07, 2013, 08:04:53 PM |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
Then they would open up under non-US controlled domains.
|
|
|
|
raze
|
|
June 07, 2013, 08:08:59 PM |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
Then they would open up under non-US controlled domains. Yeah. Or people can start using IP's. The internet would find a way.
|
BTC --16FPbgyUZdTm1voAfi26VZ3RH7apTFGaPm LTC -- Lhd3gmj84BWqx7kQgqUA7gyoogsLeJbCXb PPC -- PRpKGjgjNLFv8eR7VVv7jBaP8aexDFqk4C
|
|
|
Stampbit
|
|
June 07, 2013, 08:10:07 PM |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
Then they would open up under non-US controlled domains. Yeah. Or people can start using IP's. The internet would find a way. Or we could all start memorizing random 9 digit strings, that could work too.
|
|
|
|
Bitware
|
|
June 07, 2013, 08:31:39 PM |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
Then they would open up under non-US controlled domains. Yeah. Or people can start using IP's. The internet would find a way. Or we could all start memorizing random 9 digit strings, that could work too. Bookmark or Favorite.
|
|
|
|
MysteryMiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
|
|
June 08, 2013, 06:41:40 AM |
|
would be no different than Wikileaks losing domain. And Wikileaks relied upon DNS more than Bitcoin does.
|
bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
|
|
|
blacksterchrome
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2013, 07:53:30 AM |
|
Bitcoin never depends on the domain name, so the fundamental structure will not go down. It is the marketplace/community that may be seize. But if the community ie bitcointalk is doing nothing illegal, government cannot simply take down the site.
|
|
|
|
keystroke
|
|
June 08, 2013, 08:00:47 AM |
|
Bitcoin never depends on the domain name, so the fundamental structure will not go down. It is the marketplace/community that may be seize. But if the community ie bitcointalk is doing nothing illegal, government cannot simply take down the site.
Aren't the Seed DNS nodes important?
|
"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
|
|
|
Insu Dra
|
|
June 08, 2013, 08:21:36 AM |
|
Bitcoin never depends on the domain name, so the fundamental structure will not go down. It is the marketplace/community that may be seize. But if the community ie bitcointalk is doing nothing illegal, government cannot simply take down the site.
Aren't the Seed DNS nodes important? There handy, but can be changed when needed ... (back to the old irc based system or better yet tor nodes or ...)
|
"drugs, guns, and gambling for anyone and everyone!"
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
June 08, 2013, 08:31:39 AM |
|
Bitcoin never depends on the domain name, so the fundamental structure will not go down. It is the marketplace/community that may be seize. But if the community ie bitcointalk is doing nothing illegal, government cannot simply take down the site.
Aren't the Seed DNS nodes important? Fortunately, some IP addresses are hardcoded in. Not to mention, if your client has ever connected to the network, it will first/also try IP addresses that were last seen by your node.
|
|
|
|
Insu Dra
|
|
June 08, 2013, 08:59:07 AM |
|
You know all these seizures should boost namecoins interest. Its current state is not that interesting from my point of view but there is so much potential of breaking 2 centralized control mechanics there ...
A) Get rid of centralized .com, .org, .xxx, ... registrars. B) Put a end to centralized rip off called ssl certificate authorities.
It would just take some dedicated developers to say fu, implement a new distributed dns system in to existing clients and servers and get us away from the attempts to implement .bit in existing dns structure. (later is never gone be accepted by infrastructure companies anyway)
|
"drugs, guns, and gambling for anyone and everyone!"
|
|
|
tinus42
|
|
June 08, 2013, 11:05:12 AM |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
Then they would open up under non-US controlled domains. .EU and .CA are non-US domain extentions yet ABSOLUTEXCHANGE.EU and CENTREGOLD.CA were seized. The DNS system is run by ICANN which is a US organization. They can pull the plug on any domain name, American or otherwise. We desparately need a decentralized domain name system.
|
|
|
|
virtualmaster (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2013, 12:02:12 PM Last edit: June 08, 2013, 01:56:11 PM by virtualmaster |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
Then they would open up under non-US controlled domains. Are the seized domains CENTREGOLD.CA, MONEYEXCHANGE.VN and SUPERCHANGE.RU under US controll ? If the Russian, Canadian and Vietnamese domains are under US control then may be every domain is so.
|
|
|
|
MysteryMiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
|
|
June 08, 2013, 06:48:53 PM |
|
the .ru or .vn domains probably were purchased trough USA based reseller and they most likely taken goatse position upon government request.
USA goons, good luck seizing any .ir domain!
|
bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
|
|
|
pointbiz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 437
Merit: 415
1ninja
|
|
June 08, 2013, 06:49:51 PM |
|
This is a very real attack vector.
Namecoin is a great idea but people are NOT (yet) registering useful data in the namecoin blockchain. Last I looked there were 4 relevant sites in there mostly linux vendors. The remaining 50,000 names were spam.
Bitcoin is the foundation protocol, it needs an exterior eco-system to have >$1/BTC value. Domain names via the ICANN scheme are part of that eco-system. It's brilliant that someone setup namecoin but it needs more momentum. Namecoin is merge-mined and has everyone's respect. Yet it's not useful. Maybe we need to register names other than domain names to bootstrap it. Like map our forum names to GPG keys; maybe TOR sites can use it; maybe some type of URL directories; game data; base64 encoded data; maybe if thepiratebay used it...
There needs to be some key/value lookup that Namecoin holds that is not held anywhere else such that people will bother to have an interface to the namecoin blockchain.
|
|
|
|
MysteryMiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
|
|
June 08, 2013, 07:09:40 PM |
|
Namecoin is not easy to use. It requires more coding and more services that use them and have large userbase.
I can add additional DNS servers supporting .bit domain to my router config. But 95% of average internet users cannot. The problem is no real and pressing need for that and there are other workable alternatives.
|
bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
|
June 08, 2013, 07:17:54 PM |
|
The client and the p2p network is not dependent on domains but all the exchanges, forums, bitcoin casinos are dependent. What would be if the domains bitcointalk.org, mtgox.com, bitcoin.it, blockchain.info, bitcoin.org and another 20 bitcoin domains would be seized ?
Then they would open up under non-US controlled domains. Are the seized domains CENTREGOLD.CA, MONEYEXCHANGE.VN and SUPERCHANGE.RU under US controll ? If the Russian, Canadian and Vietnamese domains are under US control then may be every domain is so. whois CENTREGOLD.CA Domain name: centregold.ca Domain status: registered Creation date: 2007/02/21 Expiry date: 2015/02/21 Updated date: 2013/06/08 Registrar: Name: DomainsAtCost Corp. Number: 45 Registrant: Name: Centre Gold Limited Administrative contact: Name: Slava Dulikoff Postal address: Box 276, 130-8191 Westminster Highway Richmond BC V6X1A7 Canada Phone: +1.6046828059 Fax: +1.6046828059 Email: 7ic-qsxnm66e@namesproprivacy.caTechnical contact: Name: Slava Dulikoff Postal address: Box 276, 130-8191 Westminster Highway Richmond BC V6X1A7 Canada Phone: +1.6046828059 Fax: +1.6046828059 Email: 7ic-qsxnm66e@namesproprivacy.caName servers: dns.domainsatcost.ca 54.236.127.131 dns2.domainsatcost.ca 38.117.90.157 % WHOIS look-up made at 2013-06-08 19:10:34 (GMT) % % Use of CIRA's WHOIS service is governed by the Terms of Use in its Legal % Notice, available at http://www.cira.ca/legal-notice/?lang=en % % (c) 2013 Canadian Internet Registration Authority, ( http://www.cira.ca/) This does not look like a seizure by any US government agency furthermore the US government does not meet the Canadian requirements in order to register a .ca domain. so even if they seize it they would not be able to hold on to it.
|
|
|
|
MysteryMiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
|
|
June 08, 2013, 08:10:16 PM |
|
Now I see. They seized servers and replace the front page with their own version of Hello.jpg containing emblems of FBI and Departement of Homeland Security.
But Canada is almost the same as USA. They will cooperate if properly requested by USA.
Bitcoin must implement various independent ways of peer discovery.
|
bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
|
|
|
|