Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 03:01:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Please choose the coin-swap mechanic you prefer. For further details regarding the logic please read the most recent update (30th October). The option that receives the most votes by Saturday the 4th November, will be the one applied to the swap.
* You get ONE coin on the new blockchain for every FOUR Signatum V1 coins you swap to the new blockchain. All Signatum V1 coins received during the swap, will be burned.
* You get ONE coin on the new blockchain for every TWENTY Signatum V1 coins you swap to the new blockchain. You will then get to keep your Signatum V1 coins in the process too and are free to trade them afterwards. Hence no coins will be burned.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 59 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Signatum 2.0  (Read 102071 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
beginnersluck
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 03:28:38 AM
 #81

so what happen to SIGNATUM 1.0? I heard crowetic sponsor it?

1713970874
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713970874

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713970874
Reply with quote  #2

1713970874
Report to moderator
1713970874
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713970874

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713970874
Reply with quote  #2

1713970874
Report to moderator
1713970874
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713970874

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713970874
Reply with quote  #2

1713970874
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713970874
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713970874

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713970874
Reply with quote  #2

1713970874
Report to moderator
Alt.Estate
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 201
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 03:36:40 AM
 #82

Signatum 1.0 was good. I think signatum 2.0 shouldn’t fail Smiley Good luck!
lupanar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 252



View Profile
October 23, 2017, 03:47:28 AM
 #83

At last there is a steps in right direction, previous dev team was a weak, hope current one is not the same. Good luck.
...and yes, this is truly good thing - "This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic."  Wink

    ▄███▄▄                  ▄▄███▄
▄██▄ ▀▀████▄              ▄████▀▀ ▄██▄
 ▀████▄ ▀▀████▄        ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀
█▄ ▀▀████▄ ▀▀████   ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀▀ ▄█
███  ▄▀▀████▄ ▀  ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀▀▄  ███
███  ██▄ ▀▀   ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀▀ ▄██  ███
███  ██▀   ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀▀ ▄  ▀██  ███
███  ▀  ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀▀  ████▄  ▀  ███
█▀   ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀▀ ▄▄█▄  ▀████▄   ▀█
  ▄████▀▀ ▄████▀▀    ▀▀████▄ ▀▀████▄
████▀▀ ▄████▀▀          ▀▀████▄ ▀▀████
███  ████▀▀ ▄█▄         ▄▄ ▀▀████  ███
███  ███  ▄▀▀███▄    ▄███▀▀   ███  ███
███  ███  ██▄ ▀▀  ▄███▀▀ ▄██  ███  ███
███  ███  █▀   ▄███▀▀ ▄███▀▀  ███  ███
███  ███    ▄███▀▀ ▄███▀▀  ▄  ███  ███
███  ███  ███▀▀ ▄███▀▀   ▄██  ███  ███
▀██  ███  ▀▀ ▄███▀▀  ▄██▄ ▀█  ███  ██▀
  ▀  ███  ▄███▀▀      ▀▀███▄  ███  ▀
      ▀█  █▀▀            ▀▀█  █▀
LUXCORE
██████████████▄
██          ██▀█▄
██  ██████  ██  ▀█▄
██  ██████  ██    ▀█
██  ██████  ████████
██                ██
██  ████████████  ██
██                ██
██  ████████████  ██
██                ██
██  ████████████  ██
██                ██
██  ████████████  ██
██                ██
██  ███████       ██
██                ██
████████████████████
▬▬▬     DOWNLOAD WALLETS     ▬▬▬
| WINDOWS | MAC | LINUX | LUXBLOCKCHAIN |
████████      EXCHANGE      ████████



                      ▄▄
                  ▄▄████
              ▄▄████████
          ▄▄███████▀████
      ▄▄█████████▀ █████
  ▄▄███████████▀ ▄██████
█████████████▀  ████████
   ▀▀██████▀  ▄█████████
       ▀▀▀  ▄███████████
           ▄████████████
           █████████████
           ████▀  ▀▀████
           ██▀       ▀██
jonfrakes
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 03:52:56 AM
 #84

Quote
Squbs – Developer

Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing

Eikcam – Developer

SonnyDaytona – Developer

Eskodhi – Developer

Ned Stark – Web Developer

John Smith – Public Relations Manager

Kasper – Community Manager & Developer

The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency.
studio1one
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 500


BintexFutures


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 03:56:55 AM
 #85

We will get one new coin for every four old coins i am currently holding right? So if I am presently holding 1000000 coins than i will get 250000 coins?

BINTEX


















Powered by,
pr0ximus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:05:49 AM
 #86

We will get one new coin for every four old coins i am currently holding right? So if I am presently holding 1000000 coins than i will get 250000 coins?
That's right
pr0ximus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:08:21 AM
 #87

Quote
Squbs – Developer

Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing

Eikcam – Developer

SonnyDaytona – Developer

Eskodhi – Developer

Ned Stark – Web Developer

John Smith – Public Relations Manager

Kasper – Community Manager & Developer

The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency.

Transparency is not about the identity but the work. Does anyone know who is Satoshi Nakamoto? There are many coins out there with aliases for devs. They are still respected and transparent. They reserve the right to differentiate their personal and professional life imho.
I777
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:14:19 AM
 #88

Congratulations!
Really best step!
Need to kick all that shitty Devs and Co! They sold their child(project) and their supporters and community!
Need to clean up now....
New Life for Sign, New POW etc...
Waiting for!
pr0ximus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:19:31 AM
 #89

Good luck Signatum. Coin swap Ratio is so good. 4:1

Would you mind giving me link to the Swap ratio (4:1), please. Thank you.
Everything is clearly explained in https://signatum.org
pr0ximus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:35:57 AM
 #90


Haha . . A wrong thing form DOC is he ever used real name.When somebody find the truth, then he is gone. This is DOC 2.0. So they never let you know their true real name and background .They just a ass kid to cheat the develop fees 28% and dumping all.Then keep anonymous to find the next one. They can't develop any thing .They just copy all from github.
God bless you.
You need to read the content of the announcement in the website thoroughly before posting anything. The current dev team is formed from community. They were not part of the DOC team. Doc was a single entity and the current team has more than just two with a flat hierarchy. Why did you believe in bitcoin while you were not sure what the dev's real name and identity was!
coinhunter_mt2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:39:21 AM
 #91

its better if we got lower swap ratio than 4:1. it might be 2:1. thanks
barssib
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:41:54 AM
 #92


Let's see what happens. 2 months of mining and not selling, there may be a second chance.
Google translator

borderline
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 116



View Profile
October 23, 2017, 04:51:11 AM
 #93

maybe you can make better .. thant that scam of signatum...

   SEMUX   -   An innovative high-performance blockchain platform  
▬▬▬▬▬      Powered by Semux BFT consensus algorithm      ▬▬▬▬▬
Github    -    Discord    -    Twitter    -    Telegram    -    Airdrop to BTC holders
powergecko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 05:03:57 AM
 #94

Why is there a new ANN thread on this ?
cryptojai
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 101


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 05:28:16 AM
 #95

Why is there a new ANN thread on this ?

https://signatum.org/
BiGsy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 06:01:00 AM
 #96

Will it be PoW/S hybrid again. I didn't read anything on more mining on this launch or did I miss it? You changed the algo too? Wasn't it skunkhash or something on 1.0 ? Good work new devs Are you all based EU/US ? Cheers.
jonfrakes
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 06:07:52 AM
 #97

Quote
Squbs – Developer

Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing

Eikcam – Developer

SonnyDaytona – Developer

Eskodhi – Developer

Ned Stark – Web Developer

John Smith – Public Relations Manager

Kasper – Community Manager & Developer

The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency.

Transparency is not about the identity but the work. Does anyone know who is Satoshi Nakamoto? There are many coins out there with aliases for devs. They are still respected and transparent. They reserve the right to differentiate their personal and professional life imho.

With Signatum's previous trackrecord this isn't an option. The team should be identifiable and held accountable if they fuck up investors' money.
MetaSk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 07:21:36 AM
 #98

Is this some kind of joke or what?!

I've invested really allot of money in Signatum, and hoped it will become something.
I really hope that those of us investing signatum will get a chance to exchange them for the 2.0

you can end of november swap you sigt to sigt 2.0 in ratio of 4:1 because total supply change to 34,375,000.
so if you have 100,000 sigt you get 25,000 sigt 2.0.


Well, that hurts. I hope it will reach a nice price soon. With all of the belief I had in Signatum, really don't want to go out as a loser out of it.
wazooland
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 07:29:25 AM
 #99

What has happened with first version?
How can i swap ?
Ginzink
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 118


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 07:47:42 AM
 #100

As i read it, the pre mine allocated to dev and funds is 28% of initial pre mined supply. So after swap we who hold sigt 1.0 will get 72% of the new coins. But it is not 28% of total supply as many probably think. Please clarify this as it makes a major difference. Put in the actual numbers, pre mine is xxxxx. Of that xxxx will go to swap, the coins not swapped will be burned for example. And then xxx (20% of ??) will go to dev team and xxx to fund for exchanges etc.

If it is 28% of the pre mine i think you have done the right thing. There will be cash for good exchanges, there will be incentive for devs. And the actual pre mine for devs is way lower than 20/28 %.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 59 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!