beginnersluck
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 11
|
|
October 23, 2017, 03:28:38 AM |
|
so what happen to SIGNATUM 1.0? I heard crowetic sponsor it?
|
|
|
|
Alt.Estate
Member
Offline
Activity: 201
Merit: 10
|
|
October 23, 2017, 03:36:40 AM |
|
Signatum 1.0 was good. I think signatum 2.0 shouldn’t fail Good luck!
|
|
|
|
lupanar
|
|
October 23, 2017, 03:47:28 AM |
|
At last there is a steps in right direction, previous dev team was a weak, hope current one is not the same. Good luck. ...and yes, this is truly good thing - "This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic."
|
|
|
|
jonfrakes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 03:52:56 AM |
|
Squbs – Developer
Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing
Eikcam – Developer
SonnyDaytona – Developer
Eskodhi – Developer
Ned Stark – Web Developer
John Smith – Public Relations Manager
Kasper – Community Manager & Developer The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency.
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
October 23, 2017, 03:56:55 AM |
|
We will get one new coin for every four old coins i am currently holding right? So if I am presently holding 1000000 coins than i will get 250000 coins?
|
BINTEX | | ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
| | | | ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
| | Powered by,
|
|
|
|
pr0ximus
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:05:49 AM |
|
We will get one new coin for every four old coins i am currently holding right? So if I am presently holding 1000000 coins than i will get 250000 coins?
That's right
|
|
|
|
pr0ximus
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:08:21 AM |
|
Squbs – Developer
Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing
Eikcam – Developer
SonnyDaytona – Developer
Eskodhi – Developer
Ned Stark – Web Developer
John Smith – Public Relations Manager
Kasper – Community Manager & Developer The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency. Transparency is not about the identity but the work. Does anyone know who is Satoshi Nakamoto? There are many coins out there with aliases for devs. They are still respected and transparent. They reserve the right to differentiate their personal and professional life imho.
|
|
|
|
I777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:14:19 AM |
|
Congratulations! Really best step! Need to kick all that shitty Devs and Co! They sold their child(project) and their supporters and community! Need to clean up now.... New Life for Sign, New POW etc... Waiting for!
|
|
|
|
pr0ximus
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:19:31 AM |
|
Good luck Signatum. Coin swap Ratio is so good. 4:1
Would you mind giving me link to the Swap ratio (4:1), please. Thank you. Everything is clearly explained in https://signatum.org
|
|
|
|
pr0ximus
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:35:57 AM |
|
Haha . . A wrong thing form DOC is he ever used real name.When somebody find the truth, then he is gone. This is DOC 2.0. So they never let you know their true real name and background .They just a ass kid to cheat the develop fees 28% and dumping all.Then keep anonymous to find the next one. They can't develop any thing .They just copy all from github. God bless you.
You need to read the content of the announcement in the website thoroughly before posting anything. The current dev team is formed from community. They were not part of the DOC team. Doc was a single entity and the current team has more than just two with a flat hierarchy. Why did you believe in bitcoin while you were not sure what the dev's real name and identity was!
|
|
|
|
coinhunter_mt2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:39:21 AM |
|
its better if we got lower swap ratio than 4:1. it might be 2:1. thanks
|
|
|
|
barssib
Member
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:41:54 AM |
|
Let's see what happens. 2 months of mining and not selling, there may be a second chance. Google translator
|
|
|
|
borderline
|
|
October 23, 2017, 04:51:11 AM |
|
maybe you can make better .. thant that scam of signatum...
|
|
|
|
powergecko
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 23, 2017, 05:03:57 AM |
|
Why is there a new ANN thread on this ?
|
|
|
|
|
BiGsy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 06:01:00 AM |
|
Will it be PoW/S hybrid again. I didn't read anything on more mining on this launch or did I miss it? You changed the algo too? Wasn't it skunkhash or something on 1.0 ? Good work new devs Are you all based EU/US ? Cheers.
|
|
|
|
jonfrakes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 06:07:52 AM |
|
Squbs – Developer
Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing
Eikcam – Developer
SonnyDaytona – Developer
Eskodhi – Developer
Ned Stark – Web Developer
John Smith – Public Relations Manager
Kasper – Community Manager & Developer The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency. Transparency is not about the identity but the work. Does anyone know who is Satoshi Nakamoto? There are many coins out there with aliases for devs. They are still respected and transparent. They reserve the right to differentiate their personal and professional life imho. With Signatum's previous trackrecord this isn't an option. The team should be identifiable and held accountable if they fuck up investors' money.
|
|
|
|
MetaSk
|
|
October 23, 2017, 07:21:36 AM |
|
Is this some kind of joke or what?!
I've invested really allot of money in Signatum, and hoped it will become something. I really hope that those of us investing signatum will get a chance to exchange them for the 2.0
you can end of november swap you sigt to sigt 2.0 in ratio of 4:1 because total supply change to 34,375,000. so if you have 100,000 sigt you get 25,000 sigt 2.0. Well, that hurts. I hope it will reach a nice price soon. With all of the belief I had in Signatum, really don't want to go out as a loser out of it.
|
|
|
|
wazooland
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 07:29:25 AM |
|
What has happened with first version? How can i swap ?
|
|
|
|
Ginzink
|
|
October 23, 2017, 07:47:42 AM |
|
As i read it, the pre mine allocated to dev and funds is 28% of initial pre mined supply. So after swap we who hold sigt 1.0 will get 72% of the new coins. But it is not 28% of total supply as many probably think. Please clarify this as it makes a major difference. Put in the actual numbers, pre mine is xxxxx. Of that xxxx will go to swap, the coins not swapped will be burned for example. And then xxx (20% of ??) will go to dev team and xxx to fund for exchanges etc.
If it is 28% of the pre mine i think you have done the right thing. There will be cash for good exchanges, there will be incentive for devs. And the actual pre mine for devs is way lower than 20/28 %.
|
|
|
|
|