baritus (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
 |
June 11, 2013, 11:01:34 PM
Last edit: June 12, 2013, 01:50:52 AM by baritus |
|
https://cryptostocks.com/securities/34DGC has passed the Vircurex shareholder vote.  Thank you to the shareholders and the digitalcoin community.
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
|
FiiNALiZE
|
 |
June 11, 2013, 11:03:09 PM |
|
I don't get the results?
Why were there so many more voters for WDC than DGC?
|
|
|
|
ccc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:04:32 PM |
|
Rigged. Clearly someone was trying to smear WDC with downvotes. WDC actually has more upvotes than DGC.
|
|
|
|
|
mm8000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:07:07 PM |
|
Nice!  |
|
|
|
|
Hydroponica
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:08:36 PM |
|
Rigged. Clearly someone was trying to smear WDC with downvotes. WDC actually has more upvotes than DGC.
5546 people, I guess. Quite the conspiracy. I'd gather, people didn't want WDC, but were indifferent about DGC, and didn't vote either way. I expected DGC to make it, but I thought WDC would as well. It is a surprise. But a good surprise. Ching Ching |
|
|
|
|
Mr.V
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:10:53 PM |
|
wow so much neys for WDC
|
BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
|
|
|
DeadEyeCool
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:32:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
garumaru
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:37:43 PM |
|
Nice, so now are we expecting sudden burst of network hash?  |
BTC - 19zLbgtvGUttFiT9LXY8XAw1gGRiwXQap4
DGC - DM2qB66qAetszRtQACX683Vd7Bgd6sUsRB
|
|
|
|
iamrickrock
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:39:53 PM |
|
Vircurex is a joke. The fees are too high, their trading system is confusing, and their website is amateurish. If they were fair they would listen to the voters here and add both DGC and WDC. Both have good support and both have active developers.
|
|
|
|
|
RAMZA
Member
Offline
Activity: 205
Merit: 10
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:40:04 PM |
|
Congrats!! And this is only the beginning!! |
|
|
|
|
Hydroponica
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:48:42 PM |
|
Vircurex is a joke. The fees are too high, their trading system is confusing, and their website is amateurish. If they were fair they would listen to the voters here and add both DGC and WDC. Both have good support and both have active developers.
Dude, over half of the share holders, voted no to WDC. It has nothing to do with being unfair |
|
|
|
Praxis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1004
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:55:09 PM |
|
That's good news for WorldCoin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dubs
|
|
June 11, 2013, 11:59:41 PM |
|
to me it looks like wdc won and has the thumbs up! not dgc..
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroponica
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
|
|
June 12, 2013, 12:02:04 AM |
|
to me it looks like wdc won and has the thumbs up! not dgc..
It was not WDC vs DGC it was 2 seperate votes, both had equal opportunity. If both had had more yes than no votes, both would have been added. And thats not share holders, it shares, so, in theory, if someone owned 20% of the shares, would they control 20% of the vote? |
|
|
|
DeadEyeCool
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 12:08:51 AM |
|
to me it looks like wdc won and has the thumbs up! not dgc..
It was not WDC vs DGC it was 2 seperate votes, both had equal opportunity. If both had had more yes than no votes, both would have been added. And thats not share holders, it shares, so, in theory, if someone owned 20% of the shares, would they control 20% of the vote? ahhh, now that makes more sense . I'm sure there are a select few with the majority of shares. |
|
|
|
|
techbytes
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
|
|
June 12, 2013, 12:12:17 AM |
|
to me it looks like wdc won and has the thumbs up! not dgc..
It was not WDC vs DGC it was 2 seperate votes, both had equal opportunity. If both had had more yes than no votes, both would have been added. And thats not share holders, it shares, so, in theory, if someone owned 20% of the shares, would they control 20% of the vote? ahhh, now that makes more sense . I'm sure there are a select few with the majority of shares. CEO,CFO,CIO,COO.... and maybe a few more C's I'm missing...  -tb- |
|
|
|
|
Mr.V
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:03:25 AM |
|
Any one here think tht an exchange like vircurex is going to help boost the price on any coin? They lost hundreds of thousands of dollars of its customers money right, so why would anyone use them
|
BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
|
|
|
|
fendlestick
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:04:54 AM |
|
Any one here think tht an exchange like vircurex is going to help boost the price on any coin? They lost hundreds of thousands of dollars of its customers money right, so why would anyone use them
It is positive progress, congrats DGC on moving your coin forward. |
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:49:11 AM |
|
Baritus, you should be ashamed of that voting, not first to post it.. I was hoping you will some day, and you know I tried to give you advice about it both publicly and privately but I'm afraid you'll never learn it.. Vircurex is a joke, so nothing you'll get with DGC being added there just like WDC wouldn't coming there alone or in same time as DGC, without being on btc-e one exchange is quite enough but that voting was a shameful. You DGC guys are taking completely wrong approach to this game and losing my respect day after day. If you really think, and unfortunately lot of you do, that you'll make a way for your coin by trying to harm other coins on all pathetic ways you can figure out (and you are kings in figuring out lot of pathetic ways to do it), you're fucking deluded  |
|
|
|
|
