[ANN][FOR]🚀FORCE POW/DPOS | MASTERNODES | STEALTH | TOR | ENCRYPTED MESSAGES 🚀

[royalspin]

WTB 100K FORCE, 100 sat each = 0.1 BTC

[1714833964]

1714833964

[pete 211]

WTB 100K FORCE, 100 sat each = 0.1 BTC

Hi you see https://coinsmarkets.com/trade-BTC-FOR.htm
Anyone could sell higher on that.

[royalspin]

WTB 100K FORCE, 100 sat each = 0.1 BTC

Hi you see https://coinsmarkets.com/trade-BTC-FOR.htm
Anyone could sell higher on that.

No volume for 100K their

[beybietron]

^ If you sum up all volumes that are willing to buy at a price higher than 100 sat, the volume is higher than 100k.

[Jubgle Sven]

Hey dev, what about some bounties? I can translate ANN topic to Russian.

[jasemoney]

OP pool http://185.181.8.131/ is up and down, keeps kicking off miners.

[Auroraobito]

amazing net hash 710 gh 
good coin .

[xaeder]

I almost have enough for the masternode (need 90k more). But I don't have the place and a stable machine to run it. But I'll keep hodling, who knows, maybe I'll be able to buy up what I lack and run it somewhere.

I'm not even sure what are the benefits of running it, the rewards and such.

[dgale3952coin]

I'm new to mining...how do you find the Net Hash rate?

[Shews]

Definitely thinking 100k is a better number for MN considering hashrate

[royalspin]

500K very nice for MN. They will not be much. Even 1M be better.
If you want cheaper MN, go and buy desire, monaco, coinonatx, chaincoin and so on.

[eur]

500K or 1M nice for me too. There are alot cheap MNs

[ZEROtoken]

Yes that's also true.

[Shews]

500K very nice for MN. They will not be much. Even 1M be better.
If you want cheaper MN, go and buy desire, monaco, coinonatx, chaincoin and so on.

Assuming 25% of supply remains in circulation, at 500k number of MNs would not get higher than 100. Won't this challenge the decentralisation? Especially assuming there are a few, like yourselves I'm guessing, with more than a million. Actual true nodes will be estimated at 70 or less.

At least 250k would allow the real number to creep above 100 for a more secure network.

[royalspin]

500K very nice for MN. They will not be much. Even 1M be better.
If you want cheaper MN, go and buy desire, monaco, coinonatx, chaincoin and so on.

Assuming 25% of supply remains in circulation, at 500k number of MNs would not get higher than 100. Won't this challenge the decentralisation? Especially assuming there are a few, like yourselves I'm guessing, with more than a million. Actual true nodes will be estimated at 70 or less.

At least 250k would allow the real number to creep above 100 for a more secure network.

http://185.144.156.215/richlist

Do you see alot ppl with 1M balances?

MNs can be max 150 after PoW, but do you forget about PoS? It can be 1000 MNs in a year...

[Shews]

500K very nice for MN. They will not be much. Even 1M be better.
If you want cheaper MN, go and buy desire, monaco, coinonatx, chaincoin and so on.

Assuming 25% of supply remains in circulation, at 500k number of MNs would not get higher than 100. Won't this challenge the decentralisation? Especially assuming there are a few, like yourselves I'm guessing, with more than a million. Actual true nodes will be estimated at 70 or less.

At least 250k would allow the real number to creep above 100 for a more secure network.

http://185.144.156.215/richlist

Do you see alot ppl with 1M balances?

MNs can be max 150 after PoW, but do you forget about PoS? It can be 1000 MNs in a year...

True there is POS. I'd still prefer more MNs though for stability, and I think most would agree.

Those are addresses, not wallets. Who's saying everyone mined to the same address? Especially given how many different pools people were jumping to. Not a good argument at all.

[Shews]

500K very nice for MN. They will not be much. Even 1M be better.
If you want cheaper MN, go and buy desire, monaco, coinonatx, chaincoin and so on.

Assuming 25% of supply remains in circulation, at 500k number of MNs would not get higher than 100. Won't this challenge the decentralisation? Especially assuming there are a few, like yourselves I'm guessing, with more than a million. Actual true nodes will be estimated at 70 or less.

At least 250k would allow the real number to creep above 100 for a more secure network.

http://185.144.156.215/richlist

Do you see alot ppl with 1M balances?

MNs can be max 150 after PoW, but do you forget about PoS? It can be 1000 MNs in a year...

Max 160 MNs after pow. (80 000 000 coins )
After 1 year max 170 MNs   (85 184 000). (block reward 5 coins per block)

I'm saying actual max is closer to 100 or less, when circulation and whales are taken into consideration. Don't forget a large portion of coins will be in circulation due to not having enough for MN.

Agreed, 100k was probably too low. But still 250 is a more sustainable (and attainable) number and it doesn't dilute value greatly.

Of course decision is up to you, just giving an opinion.

[Shews]

WTB 100K FORCE, 100 sat each = 0.1 BTC

Hi you see https://coinsmarkets.com/trade-BTC-FOR.htm
Anyone could sell higher on that.

No volume for 100K their

Just noticed these guys quote to 0.1 of a sat (9 decimals). Sot there is a bit of volume around 200 sats, though it looks like 2000 on there.

[lentyna]

Wow since yesterday network hashrate jumped a lot. Good job, Vhawk23 on a coin.

[Auroraobito]

nice. force coin 3k satoshi next moon.