Perog2
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 11
Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.
|
|
February 09, 2018, 12:08:42 PM Merited by eeX (10), httpb (1) |
|
I'm getting same errors, so wondering about this too. Also, the Soldo Explorer is showing network hashrate just 1.93 KH/s. Yesterday, it was 200KH/s. Why is that? Is it due to the attack?
yes, the network incorrectly calculates a hash, the real hash of the network is now probably 120-130kHs. A few hundred blocks will hardfork and the vulnerability will be closed.
|
|
|
|
xuelong5188
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2018, 02:56:39 PM |
|
Block found for difficulty: 47772 Couldn't submit block: b29e38e4f238351105360a5aaae076e6ca35aadd92dc70ba32dfd469cfebd262
|
|
|
|
grendel25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
|
|
February 09, 2018, 03:06:50 PM Last edit: February 09, 2018, 04:01:05 PM by grendel25 |
|
It is past 375000 block and still doesn't work. Getting the same error message. Something about how the mined block failed verification. and it is saying invalid time stamp. Maybe a timing setting somewhere is not configured correctly. edit: I think I see the problem now "strict time sync while mining requred now" It must be too strict because nobody can mine it now. edit2: I changed the time server from "windows.com" to "nist a" server. It seems to be working better... at least not getting the errors immediately but haven't mined a block yet. But it does look like it might do better under the new time server. edit3: NOPE got the error again. damn this sucks
|
|
|
|
Slonik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2018, 07:27:13 PM |
|
It is past 375000 block and still doesn't work. Getting the same error message. Something about how the mined block failed verification. and it is saying invalid time stamp. Maybe a timing setting somewhere is not configured correctly. edit: I think I see the problem now "strict time sync while mining requred now" It must be too strict because nobody can mine it now. edit2: I changed the time server from "windows.com" to "nist a" server. It seems to be working better... at least not getting the errors immediately but haven't mined a block yet. But it does look like it might do better under the new time server. edit3: NOPE got the error again. damn this sucks look again. everything works
|
|
|
|
kostepanych2
|
|
February 09, 2018, 09:29:39 PM |
|
I'm very close to sign listing agreement with one of exchanges. Exchange is really small one, but CoinMarketCap listed with daily volumes around 4-6M Euro.
Listing cost is 1 BTC and 2500 SLD.
If Exchange is really small one why it's so expensive? For this price you can list your coin in decent exchange. Or find small one with much lower listing price... Or I something not understand... (Maybe I know nothing in that things...)
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 09, 2018, 09:41:15 PM |
|
Hi guys!
Attack mitigated and terminated within 12 hours. Code fork @ block #377777 was implemented successfully.
No rollback is planned.
Hallelujah!!! [means Zaebis']
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
Perog2
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 11
Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.
|
|
February 09, 2018, 10:56:45 PM |
|
Hi guys!
No rollback is planned. [means Zaebis']
that's the right decision. I respect.
|
|
|
|
awmyhr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2018, 11:42:09 PM |
|
FWIW, I have updated the Docker container awmyhr/soldo-miner to bulid 39, so if you are using that please re-pull...
|
|
|
|
grendel25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
|
|
February 10, 2018, 05:46:43 AM |
|
It is past 375000 block and still doesn't work. Getting the same error message. Something about how the mined block failed verification. and it is saying invalid time stamp. Maybe a timing setting somewhere is not configured correctly. edit: I think I see the problem now "strict time sync while mining requred now" It must be too strict because nobody can mine it now. edit2: I changed the time server from "windows.com" to "nist a" server. It seems to be working better... at least not getting the errors immediately but haven't mined a block yet. But it does look like it might do better under the new time server. edit3: NOPE got the error again. damn this sucks look again. everything works yes, everything is back to perfect now. I guess patience is not my strong point in life lol. Good work averting the attack!
|
|
|
|
kuranggizi
|
|
February 10, 2018, 06:22:24 AM |
|
very impressed with the look of the thread of this project, but I do not deny because you are a hero member who must have been proficient in this regard, there are some very awesome graphs in the thread
|
|
|
|
kostepanych2
|
|
February 10, 2018, 11:09:22 AM |
|
After switching to BUILD #39 I've found many blocks: 13:37:43.055664 INFO ;-) Found block for difficulty: 4764933 13:38:21.040039 INFO [5.9.84.141:33711 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block : 380671 -> 380672 [1 blocks (0 days) behind] 13:38:21.040039 INFO SYNCHRONIZATION started 13:38:21.321289 INFO >->-> BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 380671 But balance in my wallet not changed... Why??? Should I delete Roaming/sld dir and resync?
|
|
|
|
Perog2
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 11
Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.
|
|
February 10, 2018, 11:33:50 AM |
|
After switching to BUILD #39 I've found many blocks: 13:37:43.055664 INFO ;-) Found block for difficulty: 4764933 13:38:21.040039 INFO [5.9.84.141:33711 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block : 380671 -> 380672 [1 blocks (0 days) behind] 13:38:21.040039 INFO SYNCHRONIZATION started 13:38:21.321289 INFO >->-> BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 380671 But balance in my wallet not changed... Why??? Should I delete Roaming/sld dir and resync? Are you sure that the miner is tuned to your wallet?
|
|
|
|
kostepanych2
|
|
February 10, 2018, 12:29:45 PM |
|
After switching to BUILD #39 I've found many blocks: 13:37:43.055664 INFO ;-) Found block for difficulty: 4764933 13:38:21.040039 INFO [5.9.84.141:33711 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block : 380671 -> 380672 [1 blocks (0 days) behind] 13:38:21.040039 INFO SYNCHRONIZATION started 13:38:21.321289 INFO >->-> BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 380671 But balance in my wallet not changed... Why??? Should I delete Roaming/sld dir and resync? Are you sure that the miner is tuned to your wallet? I mine in wallet app with start_mining command.
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2018, 12:30:52 PM Last edit: February 10, 2018, 01:41:59 PM by eeX |
|
After switching to BUILD #39 I've found many blocks: 13:37:43.055664 INFO ;-) Found block for difficulty: 4764933 13:38:21.040039 INFO [5.9.84.141:33711 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block : 380671 -> 380672 [1 blocks (0 days) behind] 13:38:21.040039 INFO SYNCHRONIZATION started 13:38:21.321289 INFO >->-> BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 380671 But balance in my wallet not changed... Why??? Should I delete Roaming/sld dir and resync? Seems you lost your block. Another solution - restart wallet app. But you still can be at wrong chain. So yes, delete all chain data and resync it from scratch.
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
kostepanych2
|
|
February 10, 2018, 02:37:54 PM Last edit: February 10, 2018, 06:15:58 PM by kostepanych2 |
|
After switching to BUILD #39 I've found many blocks: 13:37:43.055664 INFO ;-) Found block for difficulty: 4764933 13:38:21.040039 INFO [5.9.84.141:33711 OUT] Sync data returned unknown top block : 380671 -> 380672 [1 blocks (0 days) behind] 13:38:21.040039 INFO SYNCHRONIZATION started 13:38:21.321289 INFO >->-> BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 380671 But balance in my wallet not changed... Why??? Should I delete Roaming/sld dir and resync? Seems you lost your block. Another solution - restart wallet app. But you still can be at wrong chain. So yes, delete all chain data and resync it from scratch. Deleted and resynced blockchain but it doesn't helped...
|
|
|
|
Perog2
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 11
Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.
|
|
February 10, 2018, 07:25:01 PM |
|
because it's http. Not https. Your antivirus is too suspicious
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2018, 07:58:16 PM |
|
https should be implemented last week, but attack had all of our free time. But it will be ready till March, for sure.
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
sean123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
February 11, 2018, 08:01:31 AM |
|
Hi All I am using a I7 3.06 @ 8 threads Ghz = 24.48 2x E5620 2.40 @ 16 threads Ghz = 38.4 2 x x5660 2.66 @ 24 theads Ghz = 63.84 2 x x5660 2.66 @ 24 theads Ghz = 63.84 in total 72 threads @ Ghz = 190.56 how many coins would i expect to mine in a day 4 machine's mining into 1 wallet many thanks sean
|
|
|
|
irokes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
February 11, 2018, 01:46:30 PM |
|
i7-7700K --threads 3 - 0.85 kh i3-8100 --threads 2 - 0.58 kh pentium g4400 --threads 1 - 0.26 kh pentium g2030 - 0.077 kh pentium g3900 --threads 1 - 0.16 kh
|
|
|
|
Perog2
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 11
Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.
|
|
February 11, 2018, 02:07:19 PM |
|
Ryzen 1700 3.6ghz (8 threads) - 2.2 kHs
|
|
|
|
|