Being Rick Rolled By Trade Fortress

[r3wt]

You just ban evaded again, lol.

i will continue until you remove the feedback and leave me the fuck alone

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

r3wt: stop ban evading on coinchat for reals and I might remove my trust rating.

[r3wt]

r3wt: stop ban evading on coinchat for reals and I might remove my trust rating.

i already said i would stop coming to coinchat.org if you would remove the trust rating. you're the one dragging it out. and i won't sign you up for anymore porn maillists. deal?

[QuestionAuthority]

r3wt: stop ban evading on coinchat for reals and I might remove my trust rating.

i already said i would stop coming to coinchat.org if you would remove the trust rating. you're the one dragging it out. and i won't sign you up for anymore porn maillists. deal?

ROFL

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

Just banned one of your other alts. Go away.

[r3wt]

Just banned one of your other alts. Go away.

i told you i would when you removed the false neg rep or atleast amend it to take out the bullshit parts. sure i made posts as extortion, trying to scam scammers.  you coulda just left it at that TF. The "DO NOT TRADE WITH" was uncalled for. you through that in there to fuck with my head. stop being a child please and we can all move on. and whether you admit it or not you know for a fact i never harassed randomcloud. it was the otherway around.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

stop being a child please and we can all move on

ironic.

I have just filed an abuse report with Suddenlink. I hope you read the AUP you agreed to:

SUDDENLINK RESERVES THE RIGHT TO IMMEDIATELY TERMINATE YOUR ACCOUNT WITHOUT NOTICE AT SUDDENLINK'S SOLE DISCRETION IF YOU OR OTHERS WHO USE YOUR ACCOUNT VIOLATE THIS ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY. SUDDENLINK ALSO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ANY MATERIAL OR INFORMATION FROM SUDDENLINK'S WEB SITES THAT VIOLATE THIS POLICY FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER FROM AT OUR SOLE DISCRETION AND WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE.

 You agree that you will not use, nor allow others to use, the Internet Service to transmit any material that threatens or encourages bodily harm or destruction of property or which harasses, abuses, defames or invades the privacy or rights of any other person or entity.

 You agree that you will not, nor allow others to, impersonate another user, falsify one's user name, age, digital or manual signature or identity in e-mail or in any post or transmission to any newsgroup or mailing list or other similar groups or lists. You agree that you will not, nor allow others to, forge any message header of any electronic transmission, originating or passing through the Internet Service, or use an IP address not assigned to you.

10. NO "HACKING"

You agree that you will not use, nor allow others to use, the Internet Service to access the accounts of others or to attempt to penetrate security measures of the Internet Service or access any other person's computer or computer system, software, data, confidential or proprietary information of others without the owner's knowledge and consent ("hacking") or to cause a disruption of service to other on-line users. You agree that you will not use, nor allow others to use, tools designed for compromising network security, such as password guessing programs, cracking tools, packet sniffers or network probing tools.

If I do not get a response, I will write them snail mail. You are also violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

[r3wt]

stop being a child please and we can all move on

ironic.

I have just filed an abuse report with Suddenlink. I hope you read the AUP you agreed to:

SUDDENLINK RESERVES THE RIGHT TO IMMEDIATELY TERMINATE YOUR ACCOUNT WITHOUT NOTICE AT SUDDENLINK'S SOLE DISCRETION IF YOU OR OTHERS WHO USE YOUR ACCOUNT VIOLATE THIS ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY. SUDDENLINK ALSO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ANY MATERIAL OR INFORMATION FROM SUDDENLINK'S WEB SITES THAT VIOLATE THIS POLICY FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER FROM AT OUR SOLE DISCRETION AND WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE.

 You agree that you will not use, nor allow others to use, the Internet Service to transmit any material that threatens or encourages bodily harm or destruction of property or which harasses, abuses, defames or invades the privacy or rights of any other person or entity.

 You agree that you will not, nor allow others to, impersonate another user, falsify one's user name, age, digital or manual signature or identity in e-mail or in any post or transmission to any newsgroup or mailing list or other similar groups or lists. You agree that you will not, nor allow others to, forge any message header of any electronic transmission, originating or passing through the Internet Service, or use an IP address not assigned to you.

it doesn't define ban evading as harassment. i'm sure my isp will laugh their ass off. in fact, if anyone was in violations of that policy(which is likely identical to your isp by the way) its you since you are parroting false information and continue to harrass me and threaten me in emails which i've already provided in the other thread. i returned to coinchat to apologize. i ithink they will side with me once i present them the proof of my side of the story.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

Ban evading sits under "hacking" (note how it's put in quotes by them), and is also a crime under CFAA.

[r3wt]

Ban evading sits under "hacking" (note how it's put in quotes by them), and is also a crime under CFAA.

no its not. you are lying your ass off once again. its only a violation of site TOS, which you don't have posted, and is therefor null and valid in the united states of america. further more, that law only covers ip bans. the most you could do at this point is accuse me of harrassment, but then i'm just gonna present all the evidence and press harassment charges on you.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

CFAA (a) (2):

intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains—

    (A) information contained in a financial record of a financial institution, or of a card issuer as defined in section 1602 (n) [1] of title 15, or contained in a file of a consumer reporting agency on a consumer, as such terms are defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.);
    (B) information from any department or agency of the United States; or
    (C) information from any protected computer;

CoinChat's servers are located in the United States. Coinchat is used for communication. It is a protected computer.

[r3wt]

CFAA (a) (2):

intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains—

    (A) information contained in a financial record of a financial institution, or of a card issuer as defined in section 1602 (n) [1] of title 15, or contained in a file of a consumer reporting agency on a consumer, as such terms are defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.);
    (B) information from any department or agency of the United States; or
    (C) information from any protected computer;

CoinChat's servers are located in the United States. Coinchat is used for communication. It is a protected computer.

it is a freely accessible website though. you never ip banned me, so i didnt "hack" anything. you're really grasping at straws here man.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

See United States v. Andrew Auernheimer (Weev).

http://cfaadefensefund.com/

courts have held that unauthorized access to a computer occurs whenever the computer owner says so, and the Department of Justice has enforced this point of view. Someone can violate the law even where there is no notice and where no password was hacked. All that is required is that a person, corporate or natural, subsequently says you don’t belong.

That's the legal precedent that has been set.

[r3wt]

See United States v. Andrew Auernheimer (Weev).

http://cfaadefensefund.com/

courts have held that unauthorized access to a computer occurs whenever the computer owner says so, and the Department of Justice has enforced this point of view. Someone can violate the law even where there is no notice and where no password was hacked. All that is required is that a person, corporate or natural, subsequently says you don’t belong.

That's the legal precedent that has been set.

apples and oranges.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

OK, if you think Coinchat isn't used for communications.

[r3wt]

OK, if you think Coinchat isn't used for communications.

look, there not gonna send me to prison for evading your ban that wasn't even enforced at the ip level. this is small fish. i read up about it and as long as i leave you alone from the point of you threatening legal action nothing will likely arise from it.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

That's right, now leave me alone instead of saying "this won't be the last of me".

[r3wt]

That's right, now leave me alone instead of saying "this won't be the last of me".

i already said i would leave you alone if you would remove the negative rep. i'm not a scammer. if i was i would have long since just created another account.

Also you might find this to be of particular value:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Lori_Drew

[tinus42]

See United States v. Andrew Auernheimer (Weev).

http://cfaadefensefund.com/

courts have held that unauthorized access to a computer occurs whenever the computer owner says so, and the Department of Justice has enforced this point of view. Someone can violate the law even where there is no notice and where no password was hacked. All that is required is that a person, corporate or natural, subsequently says you don’t belong.

That's the legal precedent that has been set.

You object to Prism but would use this scummy botched legal precedent against one of your net-enemies?  

[grue]

You object to Prism but would use this scummy botched legal precedent against one of your net-enemies?  

red herring
ad hominem tu quoque

try harder

its the same concept you ignorant dolt. quit acting like you don't understand the logic.

Rick Rolling Internet Meme= the redirection to the the Rick Astley video

Rick Rolling I R L= Taking advantage of somone else naivety, ie. fucking them over

You do realize that this is the reason no one takes you seriously, right? If tell anyone of the internet you got "rickrolled", they'll think you got sent a link to watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0. It's a huge stretch to think that sending a link => "fucking them over". At best, you can say it's a link to meatspin or similar sites.