ICO for the real world economy. Is this a trend?

[Andrey.1963]

ICO for the real world economy. Is this a trend?

There are a lot of production projects trying to go through ICO now. Some of them have failed while others had not a great but still success.
We think that we are witnesses of appearing a new strong trend which might have strong influence on the size and structure of blockchain world. If projects from real economy would be integrated into blockchain system the capitalization of blickchain will grow in a few times.

This means that all platforms and infrastructure tools which have been done by the native blockchain projects would have a bigger demand than they have now by using each other.
We develop a project from real business now (production hardware for mining crypto-currency). The main goal is tokenization of a production project.

For that, we developed a token that has two important characteristics:
•   It is backed up with real-world assets and can grow fast in order to be attractive to the blockchain investors;
•   It works as a convenient tool for investment in the real economy through blockchain coins.
   
The question is:
•   What are criteria that mast has a project from real world economy in order to be suitable for tokenization?
•   How the whole system had to work: the real production and process of tokenization all together? How the company will haw a profit while the token’s holders will happy with growth of their token’s price?

[1714993134]

1714993134

[1714993134]

1714993134

[1714993134]

1714993134

[1714993134]

1714993134

[1714993134]

1714993134

[joolss]

A good read regarding this topic (by Stephen McKeonFollow, finance professor at U Oregon studying crypto assets)

https://hackernoon.com/traditional-asset-tokenization-b8a59585a7e0

[Rotsor]

Yes we are starting to see regulators look at ICOs as something that could benefit the economy. However, they talk about ICOs like all ICOs are the same and that 99% of them are scams and just used for speculative purposes to raise funds illegally. That is why they want to put regulatory framework around them, so they can ultimately benefit from the taxes of the funds.

[Andrey.1963]

Yes we are starting to see regulators look at ICOs as something that could benefit the economy. However, they talk about ICOs like all ICOs are the same and that 99% of them are scams and just used for speculative purposes to raise funds illegally. That is why they want to put regulatory framework around them, so they can ultimately benefit from the taxes of the funds.

Actually nobody knows nobody knows where did this figure came from (99% of them are scams). it is a bit far from being a real statistics. It is easyer to find how many coins were failed after so many forks. The effectiveness of the ICO will be possible to assess after a couple of years.

A now it is possible to gather not a bad set of ICO projects which would bring you a profit

[max6575]

yes as developer with the customs of work of production to release of chance as offering service for the wider of public audience,
as collects with the chance of manage with the finance modulation to gains with the funding on request to cover the backup on supports as exchanging use with the expends of arrange as manufacturing resource.

[joolss]

Another good read, you might find it interesting:
How The Tokenized Economy Will Change Our World

https://medium.com/@UTRUST/how-the-tokenized-economy-will-change-our-world-b9dcfcc9367e

[blockchainmarketus]

It is not trend but it will be a requierment by investors. Many ICO are not real project, they only sell tokens. Many developers can create tokens but to make the token more valualbe, the token should be  based on real project, it is online or offline project. Live project will attract more investors to come than unexist project.