Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 05:08:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 2013-06-18 Bear and Bull: The Great Bitcoin Debate-Malka Wins!  (Read 5229 times)
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 10:22:51 PM
Last edit: June 19, 2013, 05:36:09 PM by cypherdoc
 #1

i've been waiting for this.

wow, that's the absolute worst performance i have ever seen come from Jim Rickards.  talk about fear mongering. Roll Eyes

and then, he didn't even have his facts straight:

1.  oil never hit $400.  max was $149 in 2008.
2.  there has never been a billion counterfeit Bitcoins created.

http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2013-06-18/malka-rickards-debate-bitcoin-utility-longevity

my respect level for Rickards just went down at least 2 notches.

Rickards claims Satoshi doesn't understands economics.  i'd say Rickards doesn't understand game theory.  which is quite surprising to me.
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 18, 2013, 10:47:23 PM
 #2

Yeah, Mr. Rickards' arguments against Bitcoin were rather flimsy (and full of concrete inaccuracies, like the counterfeit bitcoins... where did he even get that from?).

*sigh*

Also, why was it so short? Is that just an excerpt, or is that the whole bitcoin debate?
meanig
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 531
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 10:50:34 PM
 #3

The first link isn't working for me.

This one works okay

http://www.bloomberg.com/video/bear-and-bull-the-great-bitcoin-debate-yOOpf~n4TQqRl~K_I~Tg6A.html
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 11:24:22 PM
 #4


Yep same first doesn't work yours does

Damnit Jim are you an idiot!
They do understand monetary economics you retard!
It used to be 400 ......
Billions of dollars of counterfit bitcoins!
....................................................................... Scratches of list of informed people

*sigh*

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
n8rwJeTt8TrrLKPa55eU
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 11:45:39 PM
 #5

What a trainwreck from Rickards.

I think he became the new world record holder for most fallacies and strawmen packed into the shortest amount of time.

Potentially a career-ending videoclip for him if Bitcoin really takes off.  He will never live it down.  Very stupid move to put yourself on public record about a topic whose resolution has a good chance of going against you.  So irrational, it almost makes me think he must know something we don't?  Maybe he has secretly built the world's most powerful quantum computer in his spare time?
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 11:55:35 PM
 #6

the only thing that i can think of as to why he did such a hatchet job on Bitcoin is:

1.  he really doesn't understand the concept.
2.  he really thinks the gov't is going to go full on war vs. Bitcoin.  he could be right about this but wrong about the outcome.
3.  he is so far down the rabbit hole in his investment into gold it has clouded his mind.

the clouding could be real as how in the world could he say oil went to $400?

anybody see the whole debate?  sounds like there should be a later segment.
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:00:20 AM
 #7

Rickards describes "a lot of problems with it, we'll get to it in the main program".

So they had more discussion specifically on Bitcoin, or was Bitcoin just something he'ld bring up later during the event?

Unichange.me

            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █


bobdude17
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 454
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:34:56 AM
 #8

Rickards describes "a lot of problems with it, we'll get to it in the main program".

So they had more discussion specifically on Bitcoin, or was Bitcoin just something he'ld bring up later during the event?

Bitcoin had it's own segment, a debate moderated by Kashmir Hill. Just wish they would put the video up.
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 12:45:42 AM
 #9

Rickards describes "a lot of problems with it, we'll get to it in the main program".

So they had more discussion specifically on Bitcoin, or was Bitcoin just something he'ld bring up later during the event?

Bitcoin had it's own segment, a debate moderated by Kashmir Hill. Just wish they would put the video up.

I want to see it!!! It will air somewhere sometime eventually, right?
bobdude17
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 454
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:53:04 AM
Last edit: June 19, 2013, 03:27:54 AM by bobdude17
 #10

Sorry I was thinking of the wrong debate.

Here is the full video to this one though. OP please use this link:

http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2013-06-18/malka-rickards-debate-bitcoin-utility-longevity

Edit: Whatev, I'll just post the full one
xcsler
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:56:34 AM
 #11

Interestingly, back in March, Bob Rice, managing partner at  Jim Rickards' Tangent Capital gave an accurate and somewhat positive analysis of Bitcoin! Something here doesn't add up.

http://www.bloomberg.com/video/bob-s-daily-buzzword-bitcoin-EJ04CzJbQsKJ6CqAsDI_WA.html
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 01:47:37 AM
 #12

Just watched the full video. I wonder how the audience voted afterwards!!
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 01:52:38 AM
 #13

$500... doesn't seem that far out.
HeliKopterBen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 02:28:20 AM
 #14

He was probably referring to this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=823.0

Although I doubt he understands the difference between then and now.

Counterfeit:  made in imitation of something else with intent to deceive:  merriam-webster
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 05:13:39 AM
 #15

just had a chance to listen to the whole thing.

i never realized how much of a statist Jim Rickards really is.  how many times did he use the fear-mongering tactic of child sex and pornography?  he should be ashamed it was so absurd.  once again, i say prove it to me.  where's the evidence?

even if it's true, USD represent a much larger source of cash that drives this disgusting practice.  where's Rickard's outrage at the USD?

Rickard's strangely enough used the deflationary argument against Bitcoin while totally ignoring the fact that his gold money accomplishes the same thing.  Malka should've pinned him against the wall on that one.

Rickard's also brought up the "no electricity and no internet" arguments that we've debated many times on this forum.  if those things happen, the entrenched fiat/banking system would be up the creek as well.  not to mention national security and all forms of communication.

unfortunately, if i had to choose, i'd have to say Rickards won the debate only b/c he went overboard on the offensive attacking Malka incessantly.  naive observers probably respond better to fear mongering than the unknowns about Bitcoin.  
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 05:16:35 AM
 #16

Hey everyone, let's keep in mind that it's typical in a formal debate to argue a side that you don't necessarily agree with.

Maybe Jim Rickards thinks bitcoins are just fine, and he came up with lousy anti-bitcoin arguments just because he was arguing the "con" side and had to come up with something.

*shrugs*
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 07:20:14 AM
 #17

i never realized how much of a statist Jim Rickards really is.  how many times did he use the fear-mongering tactic of child sex and pornography?  he should be ashamed it was so absurd.
That's very similar to my experience of watching Karl Denninger take on the Bitcoin.

There are people who talk big about being "pro-freedom", but once a technology appears with a credible chance of moving the discussion out of the realm of the abstract, vague future and gets into practical applications that could actually happen in the near term, you get a chance to see where they really stand.
lonelyminer (Peter Šurda)
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 544
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 08:47:53 AM
 #18

I will be in a panel with Rickards at a conference in Bratislava in October (or September, don't remember the date now). I would be glad for tips even though I think I can handle it on my own. Sorry for being short, I'm at another conference right now and I haven't watched this video yet.
CoinGames
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 09:09:01 AM
 #19

Hey everyone, let's keep in mind that it's typical in a formal debate to argue a side that you don't necessarily agree with.

Maybe Jim Rickards thinks bitcoins are just fine, and he came up with lousy anti-bitcoin arguments just because he was arguing the "con" side and had to come up with something.

*shrugs*

*shrugs*
flix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1227
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 09:27:47 AM
 #20

Actually, Rickards' final summary speech brings up a lot of points that are worth discussing. He did a nice job of putting together some of the major threats...
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!