fishy (OP)
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
What do you call a fish with no eyes? A Fsh!
|
 |
June 18, 2013, 08:16:49 PM |
|
My theory about activity is that the quality of your posts, as well as the number of replies you give to the same topic, and the time spent on the forum determines it.
If you reply more to a thread with quality posts, in theory, you are more "active."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
kodoalt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:17:54 PM |
|
My theory about activity is that the quality of your posts, as well as the number of replies you give to the same topic, and the time spent on the forum determines it.
If you reply more to a thread with quality posts, in theory, you are more "active."
How would it be able to check the quality of your posts? I kinda like the idea tho. |
|
|
|
|
fishy (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
What do you call a fish with no eyes? A Fsh!
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:19:50 PM |
|
My theory about activity is that the quality of your posts, as well as the number of replies you give to the same topic, and the time spent on the forum determines it.
If you reply more to a thread with quality posts, in theory, you are more "active."
How would it be able to check the quality of your posts? I kinda like the idea tho. Word count, I guess. And Lexile score maybe? I don't know, maybe an admin will make an announcement later today. |
|
|
|
|
r3wt
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:20:35 PM |
|
I was wondering about this as well. I'm curious to know where the concept of this came from. Perhaps the Mods/Admin can chime in and connect the dots for us.
My interpretation is that its post count divided by Total time logged in. there could be more though
|
My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
|
|
|
jackjack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1233
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:21:14 PM |
|
My theory about activity is that the quality of your posts, as well as the number of replies you give to the same topic, and the time spent on the forum determines it.
If you reply more to a thread with quality posts, in theory, you are more "active."
How would it be able to check the quality of your posts? I kinda like the idea tho. Me too Auto-deletes, auto-bans, that would be much cleaner here! |
Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2 Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc. |
|
|
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
< My mining rig >
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:30:15 PM |
|
My theory about activity is that the quality of your posts, as well as the number of replies you give to the same topic, and the time spent on the forum determines it.
If you reply more to a thread with quality posts, in theory, you are more "active."
How would it be able to check the quality of your posts? I kinda like the idea tho. Word count, I guess. And Lexile score maybe? I don't know, maybe an admin will make an announcement later today. Hope it's not just word count -- I mean, sometimes somebody asks a yes or no question, you'd have to add some spam to the answer in order to get word count credit  |
|
|
|
|
herzmeister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:14:12 PM |
|
Word count, I guess.
Brevity is the soul of wit. And Lexile score maybe?
but i sumtimes missspell for da ironies  |
|
|
|
|
