Should I be bothered?

[mikki14]

I'm still not sure If I should be bothered by this post. https://pastebin.com/n0aGBMQr
Having said that Segwit2x Fork is not really going to happen, and is written on 30th of July this year. And BCH will be soon called Bitcoin and the Bitcoin we know now will be called 'Bitcoin Core".
It says that everything was planned. It this true? Or they just edited the post recently? Please share your thoughts. I still doubt this post.

[RGBKey]

They can call their forked coin "Bitcoin" if they want but it's not going to catch on. It's fundamentally different than Bitcoin and all these people want is control.

[Manrake]

Could you please tell me how it's different?
I mean, why bitcoin has an advantage over bitcoin cash event though it's become so difficult to send transactions lately?
Why would bitcoin still be the winner in the long run?

[soepri]

https://i.imgur.com/M4o1CIU.png
ooh scary isnt it.
all this thing like bch to the moon happend because ppl trading it, you know the demand is high and becasue news fly here and there talk about bitcoin replaced by bitcoin cash.
but i believe bch will never surpass btc just it

ill edit this later if bch price up twice in 24 hours

[13abyknight]

Only the original main-chain i.e Bitcoin Core will be called Bitcoin and no other forked coin can take its place. Shouldn't be bothered about a random post with some intriguing questions as Bitcoin Cash/Bitcoin Gold/Segwit2x or any other fork that might happen in the future can never replace Bitcoin with the support it receives from the community.

[RGBKey]

Could you please tell me how it's different?
I mean, why bitcoin has an advantage over bitcoin cash event though it's become so difficult to send transactions lately?
Why would bitcoin still be the winner in the long run?

Because scaling Bitcoin is harder than changing a 1 MB block cap to 8 MB. We have already added Segwit, which was great. With future improvements, we will add Schnorr signatures and Lightning Network to Bitcoin. This is important because these improvements focus on fitting more transactions into a block instead of just making the blocks bigger. The bigger we make blocks, the larger the blockchain becomes, and the harder it gets for people to run full nodes. And when less people run full nodes that means less people are verifying their own transactions the way Bitcoin was designed to be used, trustlessly.

[Wind_FURY]

I'm still not sure If I should be bothered by this post. https://pastebin.com/n0aGBMQr
Having said that Segwit2x Fork is not really going to happen, and is written on 30th of July this year. And BCH will be soon called Bitcoin and the Bitcoin we know now will be called 'Bitcoin Core".
It says that everything was planned. It this true? Or they just edited the post recently? Please share your thoughts. I still doubt this post.

Do not be afraid. Most of the nodes that are maintained by the people in this community are running Bitcoin Core software. Until they drop Core and start running Bitcoin ABC, there is nothing to worry about.

You should also believe in the Core developers. The are the best in the field. Bitcoin Cash will run into problems with its big blocks. You will see.

[coindetective]

They can call their forked coin "Bitcoin" if they want but it's not going to catch on. It's fundamentally different than Bitcoin and all these people want is control.

This. They have been trying to control BTC industry on several occasions now, it s mostly related to Chinese mining farms who were behind SegWit2x. Guess what, they have failed and they will FAIL again.

The problem is they make a lot of money in these attempts cause poor unsuspecting noobs always get caught into their net.

So to answer your question, NO, you should not be bothered.

[aoihs00]

It looks like juts another make over to gain the bitcoin status to their own bitcoin cash coin. These kind of posts are everywhere and they just try to manipulate the prices by coin so. You can see with the current situation where bitcoin cash has already gone very wild and there is no way to predict why that happen except  people are stressing on the pumped analogy. I see there is no point in predicting this just from the posts made by these blogs. Better to wait for the official news and know whats the real deal. Plus, I bet our wallets will be the first one to let us know about this change as they will have to switch from one blockchain to another one to accept another coin as primary bitcoin.

[alfs75]

I'm still not sure If I should be bothered by this post. https://pastebin.com/n0aGBMQr
Having said that Segwit2x Fork is not really going to happen, and is written on 30th of July this year. And BCH will be soon called Bitcoin and the Bitcoin we know now will be called 'Bitcoin Core".
It says that everything was planned. It this true? Or they just edited the post recently? Please share your thoughts. I still doubt this post.

Why? should we bothered of postponing and not implementing the segwit2x hardfork in the world of cruptocurrency,maybe your right this is there strategy to have some  little panic to the traders and investor to not make transaction in this day so that they can hold there asset of bitcoin,and gain profits in some other day.This bitcoin core we know i thinks is only the other name of segwit2x hardfork to indicate that the implementation is already there, but in different screen names,to avoid hesitation in  mind of bitcoiners.