Recommendations for additions to Default Trust

[hilariousetc]

Does anyone have any recommendations for users who they feel deserve to be on Default Trust? I'm mainly looking for people who are very active in leaving accurate feedback, mostly against scammers and potential scammers etc. I can add people directly to level one via my main account or level 2 with this one, but I'll probably just be using this account to add users for now so I don't have to worry about who they trust as well, but I will likely promote people with good lists over time.

[1714110171]

1714110171

[1714110171]

1714110171

[1714110171]

1714110171

[1714110171]

1714110171

[Quickseller]

I would recommend adding the following to your trust list:

Code:

~lauda

[aTriz]

The Pharmacist.

[hilariousetc]

The Pharmacist.

He was actually one I was considering and I had already asked him if he would like to be included, but wanted to make sure he was prepared for all the drama that will inevitably ensue from all the shitposters and account farmers he's tagged.

[aTriz]

The Pharmacist.

He was actually one I was considering and I had already asked him if he would like to be included, but wanted to make sure he was prepared for all the drama that will inevitably ensue from all the shitposters and account farmers he's tagged.

Yeah, he'll a get a shitstorm of drama.

What about zazarb? He tags a lot of people with overdue loans and other shady loan attempts in the lending section.

[hilariousetc]

Nah, probably not zazarb. Whilst I don't disagree that he's left a lot of valuable ratings he's also a prolific loaner and I don't want to have more scenarios where people are just taking out loans for trusted feedback which is what will inevitably happen.

Loan thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161170.msg12233132#msg12233132

He's also previously sold accounts (though I guess they're likely from defaulted collateral): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1194528.msg12538293#msg12538293

[Lauda]

I would recommend adding the following to your trust list:

Code:

~lauda

I see that the snowflake is still butthurt that his shady empire got destroyed.

The Pharmacist.

He was actually one I was considering and I had already asked him if he would like to be included, but wanted to make sure he was prepared for all the drama that will inevitably ensue from all the shitposters and account farmers he's tagged.

+1 for this from me. Obviously he may have to correct a few ratings, but IMO most of his are very good ratings.

What about zazarb?

No.

[actmyname]

The Pharmacist.

He was actually one I was considering and I had already asked him if he would like to be included, but wanted to make sure he was prepared for all the drama that will inevitably ensue from all the shitposters and account farmers he's tagged.

+1 for this from me. Obviously he may have to correct a few ratings, but IMO most of his are very good ratings.

I think it would be good to have someone that felted a lot of people who are involved in shady practices with accounts. It would serve as a reminder and a deterrent to prospective traders.

[yahoo62278]

I'm on board for The Pharmacist as well. Straight shooter and def has no problems with having broad shoulders

[Aventhe]

I'm on board for The Pharmacist as well. Straight shooter and def has no problems with having broad shoulders

Yep, I too would have to agree. Though for sure there will be a shitload of drama surrounding him because of all the accounts he's tagged so far that have no DT2 negative trust yet.

[DarkStar_alt]

I'm on board for The Pharmacist as well. Straight shooter and def has no problems with having broad shoulders

+1


Wait, isn't hilariousetc on DT2 so adding accounts on hilaiousetc would make them DT3?

[actmyname]

Wait, isn't hilariousetc on DT2 so adding accounts on hilaiousetc would make them DT3?

He controls the account hilariousandco, though.

[TangentC]

Does anyone have any recommendations for users who they feel deserve to be on Default Trust? I'm mainly looking for people who are very active in leaving accurate feedback, mostly against scammers and potential scammers etc. I can add people directly to level one via my main account or level 2 with this one, but I'll probably just be using this account to add users for now so I don't have to worry about who they trust as well, but I will likely promote people with good lists over time.

Recommend deleting Lauda / Bad Kitty  from DT.

Bad Kitty negative rates others like she is a retard with a paint brush.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Obviously he may have to correct a few ratings, but IMO most of his are very good ratings.

I'm open to suggestions.  I realize I've gone crazy with the reddening agent, but I'll listen to advice.

*Awwwww...consider my cockles warmed.* 

[Lauda]

Any ETA for the first addition? I'd like to see the impact that it would have and analyze his left ratings/amount of butthurt that will happen.

Obviously he may have to correct a few ratings, but IMO most of his are very good ratings.

I'm open to suggestions.  I realize I've gone crazy with the reddening agent, but I'll listen to advice.

I'll PM you if I see something that I disagree with as I usually do that with pretty much any DT member.

[criptix]

Obviously he may have to correct a few ratings, but IMO most of his are very good ratings.

I'm open to suggestions.  I realize I've gone crazy with the reddening agent, but I'll listen to advice.

*Awwwww...consider my cockles warmed.*  

Oh boy, prepare your butt for a lot of tears and drama.   


I think The Pharmacist is a good choice and it would also be nice if we would get some active people for the altcoin section to tag people there.

[maeusi]

I would recommend also members, who are not too often participants in signature campaigns to avoid conflicts of interest (although there are many honorable members, who are also active in signature campaigns.).

[Lauda]

I would recommend also members, who are not too often participants in signature campaigns to avoid conflicts of interest (although there are many honorable members, who are also active in signature campaigns.).

If you can't objectively asses and handle your own conflicts of interest, that doesn't mean that others can. Therefore, this suggestion is bullshit and similar to "women quotas" in companies. The people that are best qualified should get the relevant position, and similarly for DT, the people that are active, properly tagging people and have valid stances should be put there.

I think The Pharmacist is a good choice and it would also be nice if we would get some active people for the altcoin section to tag people there.

The problem is a lack of reports. Nobody can patrol that huge cesspool anyways.

[criptix]

I think The Pharmacist is a good choice and it would also be nice if we would get some active people for the altcoin section to tag people there.

The problem is a lack of reports. Nobody can patrol that huge cesspool anyways.

Yeah agree but that is why i think it would be a good idea to get active people that tag and report there.

If we really want to change the way the forum works we should go the whole length and that includes the shitcoin sub. 

[audaciousbeing]

I would also support the recommendation of The Pharmarcist, I have seen his comments on issues and the way he handles such. Although, not on everything I agree with him, but I am sure he has the wherewithal to call someone bluff and tell it to their face.

I'm open to suggestions.  I realize I've gone crazy with the reddening agent, but I'll listen to advice.

*Awwwww...consider my cockles warmed.*

Thats a testimony that whatever you doing, someone is watching...

My advice since you asked for it is to be more receptive for reviews. I have seen some people get tagged while some people clearly deserves it, others learnt from their mistake and ready to comply by rules. For example, a newbie asking for a non-collateral loan and the tagged will the there even after he is  a full member mind you, he never even got the loan he asked for.