just ran across your project... this is first time i hear abot adhive.
in your wp you compare yourself to indahash and socialmedia market, i can get what you and indahash have in common? it seems adhive and indahash 2 absolutely different projects. i can understand when you compare adhive to smm, however it smm is also differ differ from you, but indahash is not relevan i think. just one of many opinions.
could you please tell what the difference between you and socialmedia market? i'm sure you operate in the same area but can't clearly understand what the difference..
will be appreciated if you will provide any info, as i'm actually choosing project to invest. i didn't hear about you before and thought that the market is empty and already have a favourite..
mate, don't waste your time. it's not an ICO - it's more like gold digging.
adhive is another scam project. they will have 3 token sales with last one in almost in two years
no price or cap stated for third phase and they can easily whack all current investments. actually, they can do whatever they want to do with all tokens. no actual cap settled.
and one more thing: smart contract for token distribution? - no; how token might be issued? - no any info again.
if they gave not settled rules in smart contract for phase 3 - all this ICO is huge scam. red flag. don't recommend for investing. or you can make a deep study on them and make sure it's scam.
oh, i also heard about these guys. and also believe it's another scam. they have over 10k members in their telegram chat but i know they are providing giveaway for adding people to the chat
also they shout about 300k blogers registered on their platform... but in real their mvp looks like google sheets with lists i could click indefinitely.
plus they are already messing with all their presale promises..
+
road map is empty.
adhive ignored presale hard cap taking over $2.5M.
not confirmed advisors.
no total cap for ICO settled.
strange team (acording to linkedin profiles). it raised doubts in their competence.
i wonder how token might be issued? it seems, that adhive can issue tokens anytime.
they have phase 3 in two years, it's true/strange.
team do not shows smart contract for distribution.
their so called "ai", the main thing that makes them unique, is, actually, no more than a simple api...
not reliable variant for investing. be careful.
Hello! Some of your questions have been answered above, so i'll focus on the ones that are unique in your message.
With what "all presale promises" are we messing with? All promises (except the hard-cap one, the explanation is below) have been completed. If you only mean the hard-cap, then you posted it 2 times
Please provide the text where we are saying about 300k bloggers registered on our platform. In our last medium article when the pre-sale ended:
https://medium.com/adhive/adhive-presale-closed-with-5-5-million-in-36-minutes-75622b043862 we provided the statistics, and you can see the information "Over 6K influencers registered on the AdHive Platform" Nowhere near 300k, i think
Also regarding the functionality comment. Right now the platform is in alpha stage, so give it a pass. We're rolling out the beta of the platform this month actually! And you are welcome to try it out when it becomes available! Stay tuned.
Also in the exact medium article there was information why the pre-sale hardcap was overreached. Due to large number of token purchasers, we’ve experienced a technical issue, the transactions data was sent with a delay. Thus hardcap limitation worked properly, but it was delayed.
What do you mean "not confirmed advisors"? You can even see the #2 Appendix MATH MODELS AND TOKEN MECHANICS in the end of Whitepaper, that was written by Serguei Popov, the co-founder of IOTA and Wings (with which we have a partnership, by the way). You can check more information in the Team & Advisors paragraph of the Whitepaper. The Advisory board is located on page 22.
The roadmap on the website is very general, but its not empty! You can see the detailed roadmap in our Whitepaper:
https://adhive.tv/docs/AdHive_Whitepaper.pdf . You would like the page 53 "Project roadmap". All details are there.
Clarify your "Strange team" remarks, please. "According to linkedin profiles" is as vague as it gets
The "AI" remark also feels unbased. Have you checked the #1 Appendix at the end of Whitepaper? What exactly screams "simple API" to you in it? Please clarify.
Hope i answered all your questions in this and the previous messages. If you have any doubts still - feel free to join the Q&A with the founders which will happen this Sunday! The detailed information will come in the next post.
even 6k users for your platform is too much. i think you already messed with many thinks and to back your credibility. Q&A session in telegram? perfect. what next? gonna tell to contact via email if any questions? haha
why you choosed telegram? stream is much better option i think. what 3 adhive tops will do in one chat at the same time? that's strange. btw i've been in ur telegram chat. it huge, yes, big community but i doubl they are unique and active. also i noticed many times how ur support clean up "bad" uncomfortable questions... :/
"Clarify your "Strange team" remarks, please. "According to linkedin profiles" is as vague as it gets
" i think he meant that your team have no enough expertise to launch such really hard and complicated projects. not only your members linkedin profiles tell this but the alfa to. it's your product anyway and you shouldn't explain tha it's just alpa version... who cares, it looks poor anyway and it shows how your team express its competence in building similar mvp. hard to imagine how the beta will look like...
5.5m in 36 minutes? are you guys kidding me? another fake success story? can't believe that.
regarding ai. dude just mentioned that your ai is nothing but a simple api. and your wp don't proof that it' not..can say nothing on this but i just can't believe your team is able to build smth with ai... sorry. you have very poor expertise
+1 to fury road
Hello, Chuck! We already talked in telegram!
There are a lot of people in the TG group, there have been even more whitelisted participants, which are not in the TG group. So what exactly seems unbelieveble to you in the number "6k" participants. I would understand if you didn't believe the "300k bloggers" remark, but that was mainly the disinformation on your behalf, because none of our official media sources mention this number.
The Q&A in Telegram allows for participation and inclusion of the maximum amount of people. Not everyone is available to use stream. Also, when there is 3 co-founders, the stream option becomes unoptimal, they can't talk over each other, so the speed of answering the questions becomes much lower. This wastes everyone's time.
Really, you think the team doesn't have enough expertise? Have you read about the AI behind the platform? It have been developed for a long time by 2 of the co-founders. Check it out, i think you will like it
And "Alpha" version explains a lot. Its the most barebones version available. Soon the Beta will be launched, you will be able to check it out for yourself, but even now the platform is able to recognise tagging.
There's no "cleaning up" the questions. Only obvious attempts at spreading FUD (for example ignoring concise answers and continuous provocation), spam, and negative attitude towards other members of community is deleted.
You might not believe the 5.5M in 36 minutes "story" but there is no actual reason for us to lie about that, and the community that participated in the pre-sale will tell you that this numbers are true, and the pre-sale really ended in such a short time. You can even use the search function in Telegram, and see the messages for 30 of January (When the pre-sale began)
Regarding the AI mechanics: please tell us what in the WP is unexplained or unbelievable about the AI functionality? Why it can't be implemented? Its not something out of this world. It WILL be able to be used to utilize our platform automation to the fullest extent. Check the Whitepaper for detailed explanation of technicalities.
