FiatKiller (OP)
|
|
June 23, 2013, 03:30:05 PM |
|
Assuming both cost about the same, and the difficulty keeps going up exponentially... seems like a tough one to call. I suppose very long term, more hashrate would be better, but NOW is the time to mine before things get really out of hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
mgio
|
|
June 24, 2013, 10:34:25 PM |
|
Assuming both cost about the same, and the difficulty keeps going up exponentially... seems like a tough one to call. I suppose very long term, more hashrate would be better, but NOW is the time to mine before things get really out of hand.
Neither. They won't pay for themselves if you are just buying them now.
|
|
|
|
FiatKiller (OP)
|
|
June 24, 2013, 11:51:07 PM |
|
Doesn't really answer the question of which is better. ;-)
|
|
|
|
jagallout
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
June 25, 2013, 01:41:33 AM |
|
How do they "cost about the same"? But either way: subtract however much they cost you each from the values below. I assumed block change at the two week intervals mining 100% uptime. And took random stabs at difficulty over the next 5 months: weeks 5ghs 60ghs Difficulty(est) 2 182 19m 4 140 25m 6 119 30m 8 84 40m 10 65 55m 12 51 70m 14 40 476 90m 16 36 420 100m 18 28 336 125m 20 24 280 150m __________________________ 769 1512 Less Cost of Hardware
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 25, 2013, 02:11:43 AM |
|
How do they "cost about the same"? But either way: subtract however much they cost you each from the values below. I assumed block change at the two week intervals mining 100% uptime. And took random stabs at difficulty over the next 5 months: weeks 5ghs 60ghs Difficulty(est) 2 182 19m 4 140 25m 6 119 30m 8 84 40m 10 65 55m 12 51 70m 14 40 476 90m 16 36 420 100m 18 28 336 125m 20 24 280 150m __________________________ 769 1512 Less Cost of Hardware If difficulty goes up at that rate, the adjustments will happen much quicker than 2 weeks. That said, I doubt we'll see that much difficulty that quickly unless price starts to rise again.
|
|
|
|
jagallout
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
June 25, 2013, 02:38:01 AM |
|
If difficulty goes up at that rate, the adjustments will happen much quicker than 2 weeks. That said, I doubt we'll see that much difficulty that quickly unless price starts to rise again. [/quote]
True story on all accounts. I didn't feel like doing actual work for the OP though :-P
|
|
|
|
dwdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
- - -Caveat Aleo- - -
|
|
June 25, 2013, 03:16:21 AM |
|
According to Jspielberg's google spreadsheet the Single will do much better collecting 20.7 BTC through 4/16/2014 vs. the Jalapeno which will only collect 7.01 BTC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=236050.0
|
|
|
|
FiatKiller (OP)
|
|
June 25, 2013, 12:21:46 PM |
|
I am covering all bases. I have GPUs, Block Eruptors, and a Jale now. Should have a 30 & 60 on the way eventually. I do lean towards more hashing power as being better ultimately especially factoring in less electricity per hash.
I said they cost the same because that is going rate on Ebay. Jales are selling for about $3K for a 5 and $4K for a 7. If you are lucky, you can get a 30 for the same price.
thanks
|
|
|
|
|