Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2024, 06:59:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][POOL][DEM] eMark *nalprolap.se Pool  (Read 209 times)
friedkiwi (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 17, 2017, 03:21:41 PM
 #1

eMark.analprolap.se Pool

Pool URL: https://emark.analprolap.se

Summary

  • Anonymous, no registration needed
  • AutoPayout at 1 DEM every 10 minutes
  • 1% fee, full transparency
  • EU-based

Mining address (use wallet as username):
Code:
stratum+tcp://eMark.analprolap.se:3333
Code:
stratum+tcp://44.144.145.146:3333

Rationale

I was interested in Deutsche eMark for quite a while already, and I've always wanted to set up a pool. This is the output. And the domain name's just... well, let's say it's an inside joke.

Proof

Pool payout address:

Code:
NWAtcrgucMb98UWu8atKkqaiNgyzmquram (Pool rewards)
NZAEh4rJhExZLVP597yXNCJqqAeCh9uJCf (Pool fee - 1%)

Message:

Code:
$ eMarkd signmessage NWAtcrgucMb98UWu8atKkqaiNgyzmquram "friedkiwi's eMark pool at eMark.analprolap.se"
H6lUjZUeX0R95ICc7NVoV9sUM696UvW7HcwyFKbki9zhODGUpVz97OWGj3bUjrV6iwCIscaT0ZhQE5a+79U3SN4=
$ eMarkd verifymessage NWAtcrgucMb98UWu8atKkqaiNgyzmquram  "H6lUjZUeX0R95ICc7NVoV9sUM696UvW7HcwyFKbki9zhODGUpVz97OWGj3bUjrV6iwCIscaT0ZhQE5a+79U3SN4=" "friedkiwi's eMark pool at eMark.analprolap.se"
true
stixx42
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2018, 07:43:05 PM
 #2

Hi,

I saw your your emark pool ad on bitcointalk "Pools (Altcoins)" board, I connected my miner (4,8 TH/s) since yesterday night. It found 3 blocks (one currently pending), but I only received transactions in the amount of 36.36 DEM and 49.005 DEM. What's wrong, that doesn't comply with the announced 1% fee (49,5). Can you check?

(BTW, I first tried sending a pm, not possible for "newbies"..  Roll Eyes )

Thanks in advance,
Holger
friedkiwi (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2018, 02:49:14 PM
 #3

Hi,

I saw your your emark pool ad on bitcointalk "Pools (Altcoins)" board, I connected my miner (4,8 TH/s) since yesterday night. It found 3 blocks (one currently pending), but I only received transactions in the amount of 36.36 DEM and 49.005 DEM. What's wrong, that doesn't comply with the announced 1% fee (49,5). Can you check?

(BTW, I first tried sending a pm, not possible for "newbies"..  Roll Eyes )

Thanks in advance,
Holger

First of all, sorry for my late reply. This should now have been resolved - the payout didn't go through because there wasn't enough left in the pool wallet to cover the transaction fee.

If you haven't received the payout yet, could you post the address you've used so I can go through the logs and correct it?
stixx42
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2018, 09:11:30 PM
 #4


Now I must say sorry for my late reply  Wink

The wallet address I was using is NdQvWQ94gJgGBbXmJmLGGG4Y7XPm5pma2d

Thanks in advance for checking. I am currently reconsidering mining eMark again  Smiley

Cheers,
Holger
friedkiwi (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 25, 2018, 04:11:34 PM
 #5

Hi Holger,

I've found three payments (49.5, 49.005 and 49.5):

Code:
[2018-01-11 18:39:19.686] [INFO] [default] - Payments emark { NdQvWQ94gJgGBbXmJmLGGG4Y7XPm5pma2d: 49.5 }
[2018-01-11 18:40:19.769] [INFO] [default] - Payments emark { NdQvWQ94gJgGBbXmJmLGGG4Y7XPm5pma2d: 49.005 }
[2018-01-11 19:59:20.440] [INFO] [default] - Payments emark { NdQvWQ94gJgGBbXmJmLGGG4Y7XPm5pma2d: 49.5 }

They do seem to correspond with the date/time you've posted your message.

I've taken a deeper dive, because when using the public explorer, I couldn't match two of those transactions, and I've uncovered the following txns:

Code:
"025847819aee4d2fad463b964e2b6d5812dd8464186fc7f8153ec5f68b7db842" -> 36.36061600, 11th of Jan, 2018
"a265dd53718479025c3d642fc728f522c8f2a1535b009d4d5abfa10e515e9afd" -> 49.5, 11th of Jan 2018
"463649d806d5639efc23cbdb49dc9af9ae895969573514faec5452ce1101e2da" -> 49.5, 11th of Jan 2018
"8168af95a5b96f2768c8e038d02c93ba93577b0f20ba77636587f010421fbb26" -> 5.20249100, 4th of Feb 2018


These total to 140.563107, which is 8 DEM short of the expected 148.5 for three blocks. If you take a quick look at the first and the last TX ID above, you'll see what went wrong - since a PPLNS-based system is being operated, essentially some of the blocks you mined were partially allocated to miners who previously mined but didn't manage to find a block. Over time, this averages out nicely and tends to be fair, but since there aren't always any miners active on my pool, it can get slightly skewed. I have sent 10 DEM (TXID 3746fb2a34f59aa2c74655f76c0ba06e6a3587ec87d4db9bb05a0b59d5270151) to the address you've specified to make up the difference for this skew.

Let me know if there's anything else!

Y.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!