|
lupanar
|
|
July 26, 2018, 06:18:07 PM Last edit: July 27, 2018, 12:21:14 PM by lupanar |
|
Thanks, team aware of that, github guys doing somekind of security maintenance so lux ripo for now temporary unavailable for community, only for developers. Hopefully will be up tomorrow. Meanwhile here is alternative links to actual wallets http://www.luxcore.io/files/v510.ziphttp://luxcore.io/files/v510mac.zip
|
|
|
|
rybaplmcteam
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 127
Merit: 0
|
|
July 26, 2018, 08:35:18 PM |
|
It was to many problem with COIN LUX and now is very hard to go up from knee
|
|
|
|
StoneSoup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 225
Merit: 0
|
|
July 27, 2018, 04:04:41 AM |
|
Now we have a 2 at the front of the price, this is not good. Why such a loss of value, this coin has just delivered on what was promised. May have been some hiccups on the way but we got there and the price should have crashed straight after if it was that. I know everything is down atm but we have seen a halving in just a few weeks. Is this some big guys dumping?
|
|
|
|
Ginzink
|
|
July 27, 2018, 06:28:02 AM |
|
Now we have a 2 at the front of the price, this is not good. Why such a loss of value, this coin has just delivered on what was promised. May have been some hiccups on the way but we got there and the price should have crashed straight after if it was that. I know everything is down atm but we have seen a halving in just a few weeks. Is this some big guys dumping?
After the last fork going so badly maybe people are nervous of the upcoming smart contract fork? Or just lost their patience. Hard to know for sure.
|
|
|
|
lupanar
|
|
July 27, 2018, 06:37:33 AM |
|
Now we have a 2 at the front of the price, this is not good. Why such a loss of value, this coin has just delivered on what was promised. May have been some hiccups on the way but we got there and the price should have crashed straight after if it was that. I know everything is down atm but we have seen a halving in just a few weeks. Is this some big guys dumping?
After the last fork going so badly maybe people are nervous of the upcoming smart contract fork? Or just lost their patience. Hard to know for sure. There will be no SC fork, its been already implemented in last HF. Only SC activation expected at block 350k with might be new wallet release if needed.
|
|
|
|
StyleForceOne
|
|
July 28, 2018, 05:26:30 AM |
|
that does not work .. it does not connect and in the infos wallet 4.5 is displayed ... and why is the github page offline? and why do not you get any stake for months?
|
|
|
|
|
aovu3k
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2018, 06:01:18 AM |
|
i thinhk the falling price of Lux can definitely need a necessary boost in interest from traders and investors.
|
|
|
|
lupanar
|
|
July 28, 2018, 11:01:00 AM Last edit: July 28, 2018, 01:04:21 PM by lupanar |
|
...
|
|
|
|
d_fernandez
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2018, 04:38:01 PM |
|
After the last fork going so badly maybe people are nervous of the upcoming smart contract fork? Or just lost their patience. Hard to know for sure. [/quote] There will be no SC fork, its been already implemented in last HF. Only SC activation expected at block 350k with might be new wallet release if needed. [/quote] If needed? Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do? I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users. You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that. After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term.
|
|
|
|
lupanar
|
|
July 28, 2018, 05:51:14 PM |
|
If needed? Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do? I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users. You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that. After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term. While I not a coder, by "if needed" I mean that in some case our core guys might need to implement into current wallet some related with upcoming SC activation things, like missing tabs or might be something else. Not saying that will necessary happen but it might be. Anyway everything related with upcoming SC activation will be announced in advance right before block 350k passing. Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw. For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know.
|
|
|
|
d_fernandez
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2018, 11:37:05 PM |
|
If needed? Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do? I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users. You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that. After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term. Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw. For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know. You see thats the thing i dont agree nor you, but the team up to this day. i know you are communicating the issues about the project, but here you are the projects face. The team have several people working on it and thats just fine. However you are earning quite a lot of money with masternodes and else when you thought of fork, you didnt ask the users for it if we agreed or not, you are the owner and do with it what you want and thats correct. But miners should have been ready before the fork, you cannot ask users to solve a problem you created without asking anybody. when you look for upcoming upgrades you must be ready to have what it takes in the next step. It sounds to us that you forgot the amd miner or that actually thats not a priority, and thats why the price is lowering such an ammount as it is now. Just a constructive criticism.
|
|
|
|
lupanar
|
|
July 29, 2018, 05:44:52 PM |
|
If needed? Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do? I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users. You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that. After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term. Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw. For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know. You see thats the thing i dont agree nor you, but the team up to this day. i know you are communicating the issues about the project, but here you are the projects face. The team have several people working on it and thats just fine. However you are earning quite a lot of money with masternodes and else when you thought of fork, you didnt ask the users for it if we agreed or not, you are the owner and do with it what you want and thats correct. But miners should have been ready before the fork, you cannot ask users to solve a problem you created without asking anybody. when you look for upcoming upgrades you must be ready to have what it takes in the next step. It sounds to us that you forgot the amd miner or that actually thats not a priority, and thats why the price is lowering such an ammount as it is now. Just a constructive criticism. Thanks for your point of view, been taken into consideration.
|
|
|
|
Ginzink
|
|
July 30, 2018, 08:30:52 AM |
|
LUX have always been better for Nvidia than AMD miners? Off course the AMD miners should be able to mine it, but it is quite saturated with hasrate at the moment. With worse performance i dont see many AMD miners going for it even with a decent miner? But the option should be there, i agree on that.
|
|
|
|
boy5412
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2018, 04:29:37 PM |
|
I mean , My address show as below . it still not sent coin . Address LhgRTfgQQBq4sVdyzmp99roc8JN7BJdnvf Balance 28.6354675 LUX Rich List Rank 4261 at block 334574 with 28.6354675 LUX Guesstimated Wallet 8 addresses Received 131.09244444 LUX in 623 transactions Sent 102.45697694 LUX in 9 transactions Yes, I can see your TX didnt passed through, follow a guide that I provided above then try to send again. Hi guy , i made follow your guide and i see my wallet have coin but i cannot send it . when send coin it show " The transaction was rejected ! This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent , such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here " pls help me.
|
|
|
|
anorganix (OP)
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
|
|
July 30, 2018, 06:22:01 PM |
|
If needed? Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do? I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users. You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that. After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term. Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw. For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know. You see thats the thing i dont agree nor you, but the team up to this day. i know you are communicating the issues about the project, but here you are the projects face. The team have several people working on it and thats just fine. However you are earning quite a lot of money with masternodes and else when you thought of fork, you didnt ask the users for it if we agreed or not, you are the owner and do with it what you want and thats correct. But miners should have been ready before the fork, you cannot ask users to solve a problem you created without asking anybody. when you look for upcoming upgrades you must be ready to have what it takes in the next step. It sounds to us that you forgot the amd miner or that actually thats not a priority, and thats why the price is lowering such an ammount as it is now. Just a constructive criticism. First of all, I like that we can agree to disagree. In addition, who is “you” and who is “earning quite a lot of money from masternodes”? Please revisit the WP and the explorers, there is no founder’s cut and/or reward for the team. In regards to AMD mining support, as lupanar pointed out before - we are making efforts. Rest assured that the team wants a working and fast sgminer as much as you do.
|
I will never send private messages with payment requests for my auctions. I only communicate transparently via the forum (not Telegram, Discord, Skype & others). Please be wary of scammers.
|
|
|
Gamedroc
Member
Offline
Activity: 247
Merit: 12
|
|
July 31, 2018, 10:51:37 AM |
|
Guys, I bought a coin for another $ 40, i held her and believe that there will be good growth. For some reason, I see a price of only $ 3 But I do not stop believing and buy some more. Is there someone who will tell me what to expect?
|
|
|
|
lupanar
|
|
July 31, 2018, 11:34:48 AM |
|
LUX have always been better for Nvidia than AMD miners? Off course the AMD miners should be able to mine it, but it is quite saturated with hasrate at the moment. With worse performance i dont see many AMD miners going for it even with a decent miner? But the option should be there, i agree on that.
As I said, Im not a coder, so cant be 100% sure in, but practice showing that PHi2 is more friendly for nvidia gpus, considering how much "green" miners for PHi2 existing to this moment. I mean , My address show as below . it still not sent coin . Address LhgRTfgQQBq4sVdyzmp99roc8JN7BJdnvf Balance 28.6354675 LUX Rich List Rank 4261 at block 334574 with 28.6354675 LUX Guesstimated Wallet 8 addresses Received 131.09244444 LUX in 623 transactions Sent 102.45697694 LUX in 9 transactions Yes, I can see your TX didnt passed through, follow a guide that I provided above then try to send again. Hi guy , i made follow your guide and i see my wallet have coin but i cannot send it . when send coin it show " The transaction was rejected ! This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent , such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here " pls help me. Please do following, in lux-qt go to Instruments -> Wallet repair, there pick one by one 3 options - Rescan blockchain files, Recover transactions 1 & 2. After it will be done wallet will show you the coins that your current wallet.dat cointains.
|
|
|
|
lupanar
|
|
July 31, 2018, 11:47:59 AM |
|
Introducing LUXCORE ACADEMY. Our team's attempt at educating the community on some of the tech heavy terminology we use in describing what makes our product special. Stay tuned later this week for our first entry!
|
|
|
|
|