twmz (OP)
|
|
June 25, 2013, 05:29:39 PM |
|
Although it took 1 year to get them, I am happy to have them in my hands and mining... The "fast" worker includes a 5.5 GH/s jalapeno as well: Power usage: 440 watts on that circuit before plugging in the two singles, 996 watts after = 556 watts for the pair = 278 watts each on average:
|
Was I helpful? 1 TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs WoT, GPGBitrated user: ewal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
San1ty
|
|
June 25, 2013, 05:43:56 PM |
|
Great!
|
Found my posts helpful? Consider buying me a beer :-)!: BTC - 1San1tyUGhfWRNPYBF4b6Vaurq5SjFYWk NXT - 17063113680221230777
|
|
|
goxed
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1006
Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
|
|
June 25, 2013, 06:17:25 PM |
|
coool
|
Revewing Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
|
|
|
Xian01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
|
|
June 25, 2013, 06:34:28 PM |
|
Nice to start seeing more of these in the wild.
|
|
|
|
navigator
|
|
June 25, 2013, 07:15:06 PM |
|
I see you had some first day orders. They need to get through 11 more order days til they get to mine. I'm a little jelly
|
|
|
|
cdog
|
|
June 25, 2013, 11:40:46 PM |
|
Cool. Congrats. I wonder how many total Singles have shipped, and what BFL's per day output is at this point?
|
|
|
|
davecoin
|
|
June 26, 2013, 12:04:46 AM |
|
What a happy little mining family you have there
|
|
|
|
erk
|
|
June 26, 2013, 12:08:50 AM |
|
278watts per unit is good for that hash rate, considering that some of it will be the PSU and several fans.
|
|
|
|
farproc
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
ALGORY.io Crowdsale starts on 8/12/2017
|
|
June 26, 2013, 12:38:05 AM |
|
Great efficiency!!
|
|
|
|
hl5460
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1620
Merit: 1000
news.8btc.com
|
|
June 26, 2013, 12:51:19 AM |
|
4.71w/G. So the chips are made of 110nm?
|
|
|
|
erk
|
|
June 26, 2013, 01:31:42 AM |
|
4.71w/G. So the chips are made of 110nm?
4.71W/GH/s is not what the chips consume. Think about the error in your calculation. For starters a 110nm Avalon at 66GH/s consumes over 600watts, the BFL is less than half that.
|
|
|
|
twmz (OP)
|
|
June 26, 2013, 01:35:05 AM |
|
4.71w/G. So the chips are made of 110nm?
4.71W/GH/s is not what the chips consume. Think about the error in your calculation. For starters a 110nm Avalon at 66GH/s consumes over 600watts, the BFL is less than half that. My power numbers are taken from the wall and so do include the inefficiencies/overhead of the ATX power supply. I also think I added one additional table fan when I hooked these up, to the power draw from that fan may also be included in these numbers. When I get back home this weekend, I'll take some more careful measurements to isolate the power usage of just the SC Singles + power supply (which includes their chips, their mainboard, their fans, the ATX power supply, and the power supply's fan).
|
Was I helpful? 1 TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs WoT, GPGBitrated user: ewal.
|
|
|
johnyj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
|
June 26, 2013, 02:09:53 AM |
|
Did you get power brick or just use ATX PCI-E power connector?
|
|
|
|
twmz (OP)
|
|
June 26, 2013, 02:12:45 AM |
|
Did you get power brick or just use ATX PCI-E power connector?
ATX power connectors are the only option at this point. BFL does not have the power bricks yet, and so if you want a power brick, you have to volunteer to have your shipment delayed (which would be stupid). I happened to have a good ATX power supply left over from my GPU mining rig (which has now been retired), so it wasn't a problem for me. My guess is that my ATX power supply is more efficient than the power brick that they will eventually have anyway (and it is UL tested and certified).
|
Was I helpful? 1 TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs WoT, GPGBitrated user: ewal.
|
|
|
polrpaul
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Love the Bitcoin.
|
|
June 28, 2013, 10:53:44 PM |
|
The "fast" worker includes a 5.5 GH/s jalapeno as well: Power usage: 440 watts on that circuit before plugging in the two singles, 996 watts after = 556 watts for the pair = 278 watts each on average: From what mining platform or monitoring tool are you pulling these images? I assume the top one is a pool? But the bottom one? TIA
|
|
|
|
twmz (OP)
|
|
June 28, 2013, 11:31:44 PM |
|
From what mining platform or monitoring tool are you pulling these images? I assume the top one is a pool? But the bottom one? TIA
The top one is btcguild. The bottom one is not a mining thing. I have do-it-your-self internet-enabled power/energy monitoring in my home and this is one of the dashboards for that data.
|
Was I helpful? 1 TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs WoT, GPGBitrated user: ewal.
|
|
|
polrpaul
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Love the Bitcoin.
|
|
June 28, 2013, 11:54:56 PM |
|
From what mining platform or monitoring tool are you pulling these images? I assume the top one is a pool? But the bottom one? TIA
The top one is btcguild. The bottom one is not a mining thing. I have do-it-your-self internet-enabled power/energy monitoring in my home and this is one of the dashboards for that data. Major thumbs up!!
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
June 29, 2013, 12:13:26 AM |
|
thank you for this TWMZ. I have been searching for some real power numbers for the singles.
now to extrapolate to a little single (if these ever get shipped) I would assume little more than half, probably 150W each is a generous estimate.
I'm guessing you run each single from a dedicated PCIe cable. What are the connectors like on the ASIC end? is it 2*6 pin connectors? or 1*8 and 1*6 -- or 2*8?
Do you expect one would be able to run 2 little singles from one PCIe cable?
|
"You have no moral right to rule us, nor do you possess any methods of enforcement that we have reason to fear." - John Perry Barlow, 1996
|
|
|
twmz (OP)
|
|
June 29, 2013, 12:28:31 AM |
|
thank you for this TWMZ. I have been searching for some real power numbers for the singles.
now to extrapolate to a little single (if these ever get shipped) I would assume little more than half, probably 150W each is a generous estimate.
I'm guessing you run each single from a dedicated PCIe cable. What are the connectors like on the ASIC end? is it 2*6 pin connectors? or 1*8 and 1*6 -- or 2*8?
Do you expect one would be able to run 2 little singles from one PCIe cable?
Each single has a two 6 pin PCIe sockets. So I have 4 cables coming out of my PSU. Two cables go to each single. The particular PSU I have is modular, so I get to choose exactly what cables I want coming out of it. In other words, I don't have a mess of HDD cables or other unused power cables, etc. I have no information at all on the little singles. They are half as fast roughly, so you'd think they would use half the power requirements and therefore might have half the connectors, but again, that is entirely conjecture.
|
Was I helpful? 1 TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs WoT, GPGBitrated user: ewal.
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
|
June 29, 2013, 01:15:57 AM |
|
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
twmz (OP)
|
|
June 29, 2013, 08:55:44 AM |
|
So they have 16 chips each? Can you run GetInfo to see how many engines are running on each chip? ~15W per chip+35W for the board, I guess.
SC Single #1: DEVICE: BitFORCE SC FIRMWARE: 1.2.5 IAR Executed: NO CHIP PARALLELIZATION: YES @ 16 QUEUE DEPTH:40 PROCESSOR 0: 14 engines @ 272 MHz -- MAP: FFBE PROCESSOR 1: 13 engines @ 269 MHz -- MAP: F7BE PROCESSOR 2: 14 engines @ 267 MHz -- MAP: FFF6 PROCESSOR 3: 15 engines @ 248 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 4: 13 engines @ 280 MHz -- MAP: FFEA PROCESSOR 5: 11 engines @ 283 MHz -- MAP: F57C PROCESSOR 6: 14 engines @ 250 MHz -- MAP: FFBE PROCESSOR 7: 15 engines @ 260 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 8: 14 engines @ 258 MHz -- MAP: FFFC PROCESSOR 9: 15 engines @ 255 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 10: 15 engines @ 269 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 11: 15 engines @ 255 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 12: 15 engines @ 258 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 13: 15 engines @ 252 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 14: 14 engines @ 277 MHz -- MAP: FDFE PROCESSOR 15: 15 engines @ 249 MHz -- MAP: FFFE THEORETICAL MAX: 59476 MH/s ENGINES: 227 FREQUENCY: 274 MHz XLINK MODE: MASTER CRITICAL TEMPERATURE: 0 XLINK PRESENT: YES DEVICES IN CHAIN: 1 CHAIN PRESENCE MASK: 00000001
SC Single #2: DEVICE: BitFORCE SC FIRMWARE: 1.2.5 IAR Executed: NO CHIP PARALLELIZATION: YES @ 16 QUEUE DEPTH:40 PROCESSOR 0: 15 engines @ 267 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 1: 14 engines @ 267 MHz -- MAP: FEFE PROCESSOR 2: 15 engines @ 273 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 3: 15 engines @ 253 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 4: 15 engines @ 243 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 5: 14 engines @ 246 MHz -- MAP: FBFE PROCESSOR 6: 15 engines @ 267 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 7: 15 engines @ 250 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 8: 14 engines @ 265 MHz -- MAP: FFF6 PROCESSOR 9: 15 engines @ 255 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 10: 14 engines @ 234 MHz -- MAP: EFFE PROCESSOR 11: 15 engines @ 260 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 12: 14 engines @ 265 MHz -- MAP: FFFC PROCESSOR 13: 15 engines @ 262 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 14: 15 engines @ 257 MHz -- MAP: FFFE PROCESSOR 15: 15 engines @ 255 MHz -- MAP: FFFE THEORETICAL MAX: 60508 MH/s ENGINES: 235 FREQUENCY: 274 MHz XLINK MODE: MASTER CRITICAL TEMPERATURE: 0 XLINK PRESENT: YES DEVICES IN CHAIN: 1 CHAIN PRESENCE MASK: 00000001
|
Was I helpful? 1 TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs WoT, GPGBitrated user: ewal.
|
|
|
titomane
|
|
June 29, 2013, 09:55:49 AM |
|
Good luck miner
|
|
|
|
ice_chill
|
|
June 29, 2013, 12:41:53 PM |
|
What order number are these SC Singles from ?
|
|
|
|
polarhei
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Firing it up
|
|
June 29, 2013, 03:00:25 PM |
|
Quantum based, currently it does not fit the current style as the operational cost is too high because of Liquified gas needed while the current only need normal air to run. I notice that. The being is still not in practical use. Additionally, although the lab has solved some questions on human resources, Your being runs smoothly? I don't think so as early bird catches the worm. There are only two companies provide ASIC solution just in time while BFL is not.
|
|
|
|
|