Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 09:04:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Tails with old Electrum (2.7.9) for cold strorge?  (Read 584 times)
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 06:34:31 AM
 #1

I'm looking at Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) to make an offline wallet as described here: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/coldstorage.html) for some BTC. Tails system has Electrum included, but the version is a year old, 2.7.9. I have successfully created an offline wallet, exported public key and made a watching-only online wallet on my main system. It seems to be working, but are there any potential problems with using an old Electrum version? Obviously, at some time in the future I will want to move the coins from it. Will the described procedure (create an unsigned transaction, sign, broadcast) work or will I have to recreate the wallet using the seed?
1715159081
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715159081

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715159081
Reply with quote  #2

1715159081
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071


https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 08:30:10 AM
 #2

I'm looking at Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) to make an offline wallet as described here: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/coldstorage.html) for some BTC. Tails system has Electrum included, but the version is a year old, 2.7.9. I have successfully created an offline wallet, exported public key and made a watching-only online wallet on my main system. It seems to be working, but are there any potential problems with using an old Electrum version? Obviously, at some time in the future I will want to move the coins from it. Will the described procedure (create an unsigned transaction, sign, broadcast) work or will I have to recreate the wallet using the seed?

It should work fine for you. Any bugs should be deleted by the fact it's not online. As long as you use a higher version on your computer.
One thing to consider, you won't be able to use segwit as those transactions are signed differently.

Obviously if you can update the wallet, you should always try to, but if you want to keep your operating system fully sandboxed then that might not be an option as you'll either need the Internet directly or have to place an executable directly onto the sandboxed machine.
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 08:45:28 AM
 #3

I'm looking at Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) to make an offline wallet as described here: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/coldstorage.html) for some BTC. Tails system has Electrum included, but the version is a year old, 2.7.9. I have successfully created an offline wallet, exported public key and made a watching-only online wallet on my main system. It seems to be working, but are there any potential problems with using an old Electrum version? Obviously, at some time in the future I will want to move the coins from it. Will the described procedure (create an unsigned transaction, sign, broadcast) work or will I have to recreate the wallet using the seed?

It should work fine for you. Any bugs should be deleted by the fact it's not online. As long as you use a higher version on your computer.
One thing to consider, you won't be able to use segwit as those transactions are signed differently.

Obviously if you can update the wallet, you should always try to, but if you want to keep your operating system fully sandboxed then that might not be an option as you'll either need the Internet directly or have to place an executable directly onto the sandboxed machine.

I'm aware of Segwit, but it is going to be a wallet for (relatively) long-term holding, not spending, so it should not be a problem. Current fees and transaction times are worrisome, however. As for updating, it is possible to update Tails to a never version, with all included software, using an ISO image. The image should be downloaded and verified on a "hot" system.
mpufatzis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 128



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2017, 01:08:26 PM
 #4

I use a similar method using a Raspberry Pi instead, for cold storage.
As long as you keep safe your seed you can always create the wallet in a newer version of Electrum or a future Tail version being sure that it will be working.


I'm looking at Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) to make an offline wallet as described here: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/coldstorage.html) for some BTC. Tails system has Electrum included, but the version is a year old, 2.7.9. I have successfully created an offline wallet, exported public key and made a watching-only online wallet on my main system. It seems to be working, but are there any potential problems with using an old Electrum version? Obviously, at some time in the future I will want to move the coins from it. Will the described procedure (create an unsigned transaction, sign, broadcast) work or will I have to recreate the wallet using the seed?
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 01:16:14 PM
 #5

I use a similar method using a Raspberry Pi instead, for cold storage.
As long as you keep safe your seed you can always create the wallet in a newer version of Electrum or a future Tail version being sure that it will be working.


I'm looking at Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) to make an offline wallet as described here: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/coldstorage.html) for some BTC. Tails system has Electrum included, but the version is a year old, 2.7.9. I have successfully created an offline wallet, exported public key and made a watching-only online wallet on my main system. It seems to be working, but are there any potential problems with using an old Electrum version? Obviously, at some time in the future I will want to move the coins from it. Will the described procedure (create an unsigned transaction, sign, broadcast) work or will I have to recreate the wallet using the seed?

Raspberry Pi for cold storage? Interesting idea. Which OS do you use? I also have an old Raspberry Pi (model B) somewhere in my desk drawers.
mpufatzis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 128



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2017, 01:25:31 PM
 #6

Here is an old post of mine describing how it works:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2289365.msg24280376#msg24280376



I use a similar method using a Raspberry Pi instead, for cold storage.
As long as you keep safe your seed you can always create the wallet in a newer version of Electrum or a future Tail version being sure that it will be working.


I'm looking at Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) to make an offline wallet as described here: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/coldstorage.html) for some BTC. Tails system has Electrum included, but the version is a year old, 2.7.9. I have successfully created an offline wallet, exported public key and made a watching-only online wallet on my main system. It seems to be working, but are there any potential problems with using an old Electrum version? Obviously, at some time in the future I will want to move the coins from it. Will the described procedure (create an unsigned transaction, sign, broadcast) work or will I have to recreate the wallet using the seed?

Raspberry Pi for cold storage? Interesting idea. Which OS do you use? I also have an old Raspberry Pi (model B) somewhere in my desk drawers.
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 01:55:42 PM
 #7

Here is an old post of mine describing how it works:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2289365.msg24280376#msg24280376

Thanks. So you even deleted everything and kept the seed only? That's right, there is probably no reason to backup the wallet.
mpufatzis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 128



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2017, 03:22:50 PM
 #8

If you want to check your BTCs you can install the Electrum in your PC and instead installing your Master Public Key, to install your addresses one by one.
I've read (not 100% sure) that if your master public key and one of your private keys would be known, your wallet could be compromised.

Where I live I can't buy yet anything with BTC, so using them is not an issue at the time being.


Here is an old post of mine describing how it works:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2289365.msg24280376#msg24280376

Thanks. So you even deleted everything and kept the seed only? That's right, there is probably no reason to backup the wallet.
User365
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 251


physics, mathematics and engineering


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 04:29:27 PM
 #9

TailsOS with electrum as cold storage is a perfect idea, I use it for my coins too. Furthermore, I like the "watch wallet" function which I use on my phone.

The only downsides are that up to now you can´t use segwit and if there is a newer version of tails, you will have to install the update manually, because there are no over the air updates.

[could be your ad]
Abdussamad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3612
Merit: 1564



View Profile
November 27, 2017, 06:35:51 PM
 #10

Don't use tails because it has an old version of electrum that has trouble synching with servers. Use a debian live CD and install the latest electrum on it as per the instructions on electrum.org/#download i.e. using pip3.
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 07:00:43 PM
 #11

TailsOS with electrum as cold storage is a perfect idea, I use it for my coins too. Furthermore, I like the "watch wallet" function which I use on my phone.

Yes, that's very convenient.

The only downsides are that up to now you can´t use segwit and if there is a newer version of tails, you will have to install the update manually, because there are no over the air updates.

Tails system is never going to be online anyway, so manual update is perfectly suitable.
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 07:04:31 PM
 #12

Don't use tails because it has an old version of electrum that has trouble synching with servers. Use a debian live CD and install the latest electrum on it as per the instructions on electrum.org/#download i.e. using pip3.

The cold wallet will not be syncing with servers anyway, because the system will never be online. The only potential problem may be with wallet, seed or signature formats, not with server connections.
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071


https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 08:48:44 PM
 #13

Don't use tails because it has an old version of electrum that has trouble synching with servers. Use a debian live CD and install the latest electrum on it as per the instructions on electrum.org/#download i.e. using pip3.

The cold wallet will not be syncing with servers anyway, because the system will never be online. The only potential problem may be with wallet, seed or signature formats, not with server connections.

Also, the issue with networking with servers is generally fairly easy to fix.
And to confirm, along with the above posts of people who have used it with tails successfully, there should be no signature differences for legacy transactions and you should also be able to send coins to segwit addresses, just not sending a segwit transaction from your wallet.



A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 28, 2017, 07:45:32 AM
 #14

Also, the issue with networking with servers is generally fairly easy to fix.
And to confirm, along with the above posts of people who have used it with tails successfully, there should be no signature differences for legacy transactions and you should also be able to send coins to segwit addresses, just not sending a segwit transaction from your wallet.

Thanks, that's probably all I need. Maybe I'll want to move my coins to a new Segwit address in the future, but now it is not needed at all.
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710



View Profile
November 28, 2017, 06:42:11 PM
 #15

It should work fine with online version 3.x
I tried.


.BEST..CHANGE.███████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████████
..BUY/ SELL CRYPTO..
User365
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 251


physics, mathematics and engineering


View Profile
November 28, 2017, 07:36:07 PM
 #16

The only downsides are that up to now you can´t use segwit and if there is a newer version of tails, you will have to install the update manually, because there are no over the air updates.

Tails system is never going to be online anyway, so manual update is perfectly suitable.

Well, considering that when you install tails you have to follow those steps, it is more or less time consuming:

- download the iso file
- install it on a USB drive
- boot from that USB drive
- install tails on the other USB stick
- format the first one

Compared to an over the air update which I imagine like that:

- Boot from your already existent tails
- press a button

Even if you have it not online except you need your money from cold storage, I would prefer over the air updates.

[could be your ad]
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071


https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory


View Profile
November 28, 2017, 10:13:43 PM
 #17

Also, the issue with networking with servers is generally fairly easy to fix.
And to confirm, along with the above posts of people who have used it with tails successfully, there should be no signature differences for legacy transactions and you should also be able to send coins to segwit addresses, just not sending a segwit transaction from your wallet.

Thanks, that's probably all I need. Maybe I'll want to move my coins to a new Segwit address in the future, but now it is not needed at all.
I'd recommend not using SegWit anyway yet at all in a wallet you're not going to spend from by any large rate as it doesn't save very much and there should be more to come so updating at every hard fork faced would just be to much of an arduous task to keep doing every hard fork (as there may be more to come and there's always segwit2x if that gets rescheduled.

A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 06:16:45 AM
 #18

It should work fine with online version 3.x
I tried.

Good. I installed it and tried to send a small sum to it. Watching-only wallets work, both under Linux and Android.
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 06:19:05 AM
 #19

Well, considering that when you install tails you have to follow those steps, it is more or less time consuming:

- download the iso file
- install it on a USB drive
- boot from that USB drive
- install tails on the other USB stick
- format the first one

Compared to an over the air update which I imagine like that:

- Boot from your already existent tails
- press a button

Even if you have it not online except you need your money from cold storage, I would prefer over the air updates.

AFAIU, it can also be upgraded from a system running in a virtual machine, which is OK for me.
A1exander (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 06:22:00 AM
 #20

Also, the issue with networking with servers is generally fairly easy to fix.
And to confirm, along with the above posts of people who have used it with tails successfully, there should be no signature differences for legacy transactions and you should also be able to send coins to segwit addresses, just not sending a segwit transaction from your wallet.

Thanks, that's probably all I need. Maybe I'll want to move my coins to a new Segwit address in the future, but now it is not needed at all.
I'd recommend not using SegWit anyway yet at all in a wallet you're not going to spend from by any large rate as it doesn't save very much and there should be more to come so updating at every hard fork faced would just be to much of an arduous task to keep doing every hard fork (as there may be more to come and there's always segwit2x if that gets rescheduled.

Thanks, I have a similar feeling and I'll follow this advice. It is not a spending wallet and will be used only when I decide to 'cash out' (partially) or need to move the coins to another cold wallet.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!