|
turvarya
|
 |
October 18, 2014, 05:57:15 PM |
|
Fatty has a point. For now it is just a academical problem without even a forecast, when it will become a real problem.
Doesn't seem like it will become a real problem next year and they are already working on a solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
October 18, 2014, 07:46:39 PM |
|
Wikipedia is not a credible source as anyone can make an edit to a wikipedia entry.
You are wrong. It's moderator by other users and you can't post anything you wish. You must provide references that will be checked by others. |
|
|
|
|
|
R2D221
|
|
October 18, 2014, 08:19:28 PM |
|
The problem of ever-growing blockchain is a common knowledge. I don't see a point to add anything to the description. If you want a solution, the problem must be specific. You can't rely on common knowledge to propose a solution, because although it's common, it might be understood differently by each person. And then conflicts emerge. |
An economy based on endless growth is unsustainable.
|
|
|
|
turvarya
|
|
October 18, 2014, 08:24:15 PM |
|
Wikipedia is not a credible source as anyone can make an edit to a wikipedia entry.
You are wrong. It's moderator by other users and you can't post anything you wish. You must provide references that will be checked by others. I like Wikipedia, but it is not really a reliable source. You can just take any crap news site or blog as a reference. A lot of people just write something themself and than put it on wikipedia, with them self as a reference |
|
|
|
|
mnmShadyBTC
|
|
October 18, 2014, 09:00:51 PM |
|
Wikipedia is not a credible source as anyone can make an edit to a wikipedia entry.
You are wrong. It's moderator by other users and you can't post anything you wish. You must provide references that will be checked by others. Not true. It is moderated to a point but only that the sources are there and the style of writing is correct. In the event that something breaks the rules then only a warning will be put on the post and a suggestion for the post to be edited. The moderators will not actually edit the content or censor the content that is not accurate. EDIT: it is a good resource to find resources that are related to what you are trying to research but you should never use wikipedia as a credible source as it is not one |
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience - PRIMEDICE 3 HAS LAUNCHED @PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
October 19, 2014, 08:14:03 AM |
|
What credibility of Wikipedia has to do with the discussion? It doesn't change the fact that the problem of bloated blockchain is well-known.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Window2Wall
|
|
October 19, 2014, 08:30:45 PM |
|
What credibility of Wikipedia has to do with the discussion? It doesn't change the fact that the problem of bloated blockchain is well-known.
It is not an issue today as the blocks that are being mined are still well below the max block size of 1 MB. The solution is now much closer then it has been in the past as a hard fork is being proposed that would have the block size increase over time. Anyone who is "bloating" the blockchain with unnecessary spam is paying for the privilege of putting such spam on the blockchain (via TX fees) so people will have disincentives to do so, and when they do there is no real damage to the blockchain |
|
|
|
|
jabo38
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
|
|
October 20, 2014, 03:01:49 AM |
|
I am a firm believer that bitcoin is facing three challenges. 1. blockchain bloat, 2. low transaction rate per second, and 3. a mining system growing into something it wasn't ever designed to be.
The OP has brought up a serious question. Blowing him off doesn't fix the problem. I would love to see Bitcoin succeed and would really like to see a definitive road map here of how bloat is going to be solved.
What I have read so far in responses is that
A) it is no big deal because as the blockchain grows, so will computers ability to handle it
B) there is a way to trim it but it hasn't been implemented
I don't know enough on the technical side to know if either of these are true, but I know they can't both be true.
One answer says there is no problem, the other says there is a problem but that the problem is not that big of a deal.
If the "A" scenerio is true, what happens if computers don't grow with the ability, what if the growth of Bitcoin explodes next year, what is plan B then?
If the "B" scenerio is true, why hasn't it been implemented yet, or at least some kind of alpha is in the works that can be built upon? It has been many years.
|
|
|
|
|
turvarya
|
|
October 20, 2014, 06:54:23 AM |
|
I am a firm believer that bitcoin is facing three challenges. 1. blockchain bloat, 2. low transaction rate per second, and 3. a mining system growing into something it wasn't ever designed to be.
The OP has brought up a serious question. Blowing him off doesn't fix the problem. I would love to see Bitcoin succeed and would really like to see a definitive road map here of how bloat is going to be solved.
What I have read so far in responses is that
A) it is no big deal because as the blockchain grows, so will computers ability to handle it
B) there is a way to trim it but it hasn't been implemented
I don't know enough on the technical side to know if either of these are true, but I know they can't both be true.
One answer says there is no problem, the other says there is a problem but that the problem is not that big of a deal.
If the "A" scenerio is true, what happens if computers don't grow with the ability, what if the growth of Bitcoin explodes next year, what is plan B then?
If the "B" scenerio is true, why hasn't it been implemented yet, or at least some kind of alpha is in the works that can be built upon? It has been many years.
You got it wrong. There is a problem, but it is not a real problem(since computer power is far ahead), yet. So, plenty of time to fix it and they(Gavin) are currently working on it. Like I stated before, there is not even a forecast, when it will become a real problem, which just proofs we have plenty of time. |
|
|
|
|
Daedelus
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:39:34 PM |
|
Blockchain size has crossed 10000 MB mark. I think it's time to close this thread until we see 20000 MB...
Sorry for bad timing, I missed the moment when the blockchain was 20000 MB. It's larger than 22000 MB now, could anyone point me to a solution of the problem (if it's implemented)? There is not a problem. Bandwidth that is available for ~$40 per month is increasing at a faster rate then the blockchain is growing by, the same is true with both hard drive storage and RAM memory. Can't someone devise a system where costs aren't planned to escalate continuously into the future? One that is cheap today and always will be?... I don't pay $40 for internet and I'd prefer not to keep having to upgrade my computer every couple of years for no discernible benefit... I have had enough of that in Windoze... |
|
|
|
|
herzmeister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007
|
|
October 20, 2014, 04:00:25 PM |
|
Can't someone devise a system where costs aren't planned to escalate continuously into the future? One that is cheap today and always will be?...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MaidSafe |
|
|
|
|
Daedelus
|
|
January 18, 2015, 04:32:36 PM |
|
I was jerking around, hands on cheeks damsel in distress style  I already knew of a platform where costs would not increase significantly as the network grows. |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
March 11, 2015, 06:36:44 PM |
|
Bitcoin blockchain size is 30 GB. I've heard that Bitcoin 0.10 got improved blockchain downloading. How many times is it faster now?
|
|
|
|
|
manselr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1004
|
|
March 11, 2015, 06:53:38 PM |
|
Bitcoin blockchain size is 30 GB. I've heard that Bitcoin 0.10 got improved blockchain downloading. How many times is it faster now?
I had to download the entire blockchain again because as I updated from 9.3 or whatever the previous version was it got corrupted. It was much faster, much many connected peers and the connections happened quicker. Last time it took me like 2 days, this time I managed to do it in 6 hours or something along the lines. |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
March 11, 2015, 07:06:52 PM |
|
I had to download the entire blockchain again because as I updated from 9.3 or whatever the previous version was it got corrupted. It was much faster, much many connected peers and the connections happened quicker. Last time it took me like 2 days, this time I managed to do it in 6 hours or something along the lines.
So it's like 10x speed up, a good moment for 20 MiB blocks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
turvarya
|
|
March 12, 2015, 05:32:16 PM |
|
Bitcoin blockchain size is 30 GB. I've heard that Bitcoin 0.10 got improved blockchain downloading. How many times is it faster now?
I had to download the entire blockchain again because as I updated from 9.3 or whatever the previous version was it got corrupted. It was much faster, much many connected peers and the connections happened quicker. Last time it took me like 2 days, this time I managed to do it in 6 hours or something along the lines. are you sure about that? I just had to index the whole thing again, not download it, which took less than a day on my PC |
|
|
|
|
ChuckBuck
|
|
March 12, 2015, 06:59:01 PM |
|
Bitcoin blockchain size is 30 GB. I've heard that Bitcoin 0.10 got improved blockchain downloading. How many times is it faster now?
I had to download the entire blockchain again because as I updated from 9.3 or whatever the previous version was it got corrupted. It was much faster, much many connected peers and the connections happened quicker. Last time it took me like 2 days, this time I managed to do it in 6 hours or something along the lines. are you sure about that? I just had to index the whole thing again, not download it, which took less than a day on my PC I had a similar issue to manselr, I had 0.9.1 I believe. Did the install correctly, it launched, then there was some sort of error message and the only option pretty much to continue is download the entire blockchain from block 0. Since I don't have an SSD Hard drive on my laptop, it took me like 12-14 hours total to redownload. Better than the 2-3 days typical time, but still a long time overall. |
|
|
|
|
Daedelus
|
|
April 15, 2015, 10:24:31 AM |
|
Are there still plans for pruning? Is it technically possible in BTC?
|
|
|
|
|
BillyBobZorton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1028
|
|
April 15, 2015, 01:22:19 PM |
|
Apparently, Satoshi predicted this and his reply was: "By the time BTC is mainstream, technology will be advanced enough for 1MB not being a problem".
|
|
|
|
|
|
