Blockchain technology used by banks and NYSE has nothing to do with bitcoin adoption.
Except it very much does. Even if bitcoin itself isn't the technology being used for these services, Bitcoin's adoption and/or price scales proportionately to the adoption of the services it made possible. You can track this fairly reliably, and to deny this is silly.
What is silly is to keep insisting on bitcoin being undervalued by 67,000% with such stupid arguments.
Yes, I am sure no algorithm takes into account what will happen if Trump and Kim Jong-un start playing with atomic bombs and we all disappear. Mathematical projections like that one leave aside many events.
This is a terrible argument. This is it's own reductio it's so bad. The same line of reasoning leads to saying that any model of valuation (or any projection model or statistic for that matter) is nonsense because it doesn't include every other fact in the world. How can you ever know anything at all if what you're saying is true? You've just imploded the entirety of epistemology, this self-defeats.
What is self-defeating and own reductio is you defending bitcoin being undervalued by so much according to nonsense estimates and calculations.
One of my rules on this forum is not to reply to newbie silly posts. Yours didn’t seem so silly at first sight but I’m putting you on my ignore list because you are not worth wasting my time.
