Yes, that's right, some extra competition in the bitcoin trading field!

Features :
 - A nice interface,
 - No need to send XX.YZX bitcoins to the ABC address, use any of your addresses!
 - Trading, for free, as in beer, good dutch beer,
 - Trade for EUR and USD (liberty reserve for now),
 - MyBitcoin like features to come (MB interface compatible SCI)
 - Bootstrapped with a couple of interesting trade orders,
 - Oh, did I mention trades are free ?

Sign-up and stay tuned for more delicious features !

+1

Any chances of sending euros through bank transfer, like bitcoinexchange used to do? (By the way, anyone knows why they are gone?)

+1 good stuff

Suggestions:

• Connecting to non-SSL http://www.bitcoin-central.net/ gives an unfriendly "access refused" message
• Supporting Pecunix GAU would be nice

That is because the seller/buyer doesn't have enough balance to complete the trade, this is an issue, I will fix it promptly

I raised the bar a little to 3 confirmations which was the original setting, do you like the "your funds are here, just wait for it a little more" instead of "F5, not yet, F5, not yet, F5, phew, finally". You can hover over the amount in the account history to see how much more confirmations are required.

Fixed, thanks for bringing that to my attention

Thank you very much!

Fixed, it now gently redirects

Is there really that much demand for it ?

See previous answer, I'm going to fix this ASAP, it is confusing indeed, I'll inactivate orders when they fail to complete due to lack of funds and try to reactivate them after each successful incoming transfer.

You got the "server error, something went wrong, i'll eat your family" page ?
I'll check the logs and try to reproduce, thanks for pointing it out.

Yea, I know
I want to start supportign LiqPay, that would also allow total noobs to buy with a plain old CC. But I'm afraid that would be against their ToS and that I'd end up gang raped by angry users if my account gets frozen. I'll see when I've ironed the rest out.

Maybe they got caught for not complying with banking regulations or sthg? I guess it wouldn't be too risky if I always maintain a <2~3k€ balance on the bank account.
You can donate by bank transfer though :p

I'll deploy the fixes in an hour or so.

Thank you very very much for your comments and positive feedback !!

I see, I'll start adding more of these once I've ironed the first quirks out, I love Ruby on Rails and it's "if your test suite is strong, go nuts with refactoring"

Sure, just give me a couple examples so I can just mirror some API you're already being fed.

I'll look into that, it has its official github issue

Yea, I'm thinking that it could be really nice

In my private repos

Idk, never really thought about it but it represents quite some man hours

My pleasure, I hadn't found such an exciting rails project since a long time, also all the cool kids have opened their BTC service

I don't mind opening some parts up.
I basically have a wrapper for the client that's based on method missing and making use of a nice yml file for credentials, ports etc.


Is an example use case.

Then I have a whenever schedule that feeds the transactions into my DB, updating confirmations every couple of minutes.

Nothing very complicated, i'll share it if you find some use to it, but right now all my time goes to smoothing trading out

Would you consider cash in mail in order to put in some funds ?

If rumors are correct they are busy with a more mt gox/bitcoin-central style trading website.
One thing is clear, it are not problems with bank regulations

That's because they're not removed upon completion.
Also you might wonder why some orders that could be matched still appear in the order book, that's just because one of the parties doesn't have the required balance to complete the trade.

So the trading works fine, it's just the order book that needs to get some attention.

Fixes are almost ready, they should get deployed tomorrow around noon UTC.

A couple of charts and all the interfaces will follow promptly.