Dalkore
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
|
|
July 17, 2013, 07:40:20 PM |
|
Chips incoming.
|
Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - LinkTransaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
|
|
|
papamoi
|
|
July 17, 2013, 09:01:13 PM |
|
Chips incoming.
what do you mean?
|
|
|
|
Xian01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
|
|
July 17, 2013, 09:34:41 PM |
|
Chips incoming.
Are you saying we'll be able to start throwing money at Gridchip's 40nm ASIC soon ? Or are you referring to the Avalon 110nm chips being imminently available ?
|
|
|
|
erschiessen
|
|
July 17, 2013, 10:16:12 PM |
|
Why are Gridchip's 40 nm chips suckier than BFL's 65 nm chips?
|
Your Message Here 12KHW3i2Hamk1irY8b181N4vMXUnVYL1ah
|
|
|
fiktionist
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
July 17, 2013, 11:16:12 PM |
|
Why are Gridchip's 40 nm chips suckier than BFL's 65 nm chips?
are you refering to the power consumption?
|
liked that post? Official BeerAdress: 12Q9d7tntiQXARjpVSRKnQhzJy4MoAaonL
|
|
|
erschiessen
|
|
July 17, 2013, 11:38:38 PM |
|
Why are Gridchip's 40 nm chips suckier than BFL's 65 nm chips?
are you refering to the power consumption? HASHRATE And the 40nm chip hash rate will be 2-2.5G
|
Your Message Here 12KHW3i2Hamk1irY8b181N4vMXUnVYL1ah
|
|
|
adamthefishman
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2013, 12:18:57 AM |
|
40nm sounds cool.
Is this the smallest possible at this point in time??
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
July 18, 2013, 12:19:54 AM |
|
Hashrate of a single chip is largely irrelevant. A board with 1 large chip or a board with 10 small chips are not significantly different.
Delivery dates, cost, and power consumption are the key factors.
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
tolip_wen
|
|
July 22, 2013, 10:17:56 AM Last edit: July 25, 2013, 11:31:14 PM by tolip_wen |
|
40nm sounds cool.
Is this the smallest possible at this point in time??
KnCMiner claims 28nm EDIT: changed 26 to 28 as pointed out below
|
'twisted research and opinion' donations happily accepted @ 13362fxFAdrhagmCvSmFy4WoHrNRPG2V57 My sub 1337 vanity address
|
|
|
GandalfG
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
Dig your freedom
|
|
July 22, 2013, 10:32:24 AM |
|
40nm sounds cool.
Is this the smallest possible at this point in time??
KnCMiner claims 26nm You mean 28nm
|
Want to say thanks? 16ragydppe9QFRVhrdwEUjgfMS7KCfEFGY
|
|
|
adamthefishman
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
July 22, 2013, 11:41:45 AM |
|
Interesting. Will keep posted on this.
|
|
|
|
GodHatesFigs
|
|
July 22, 2013, 04:58:01 PM |
|
Also interested. Good luck
My first thought reading this is "Awesome ! More competition entering Bitcoin space". My second thought is "Come on, rest of the world ! Why is Shenzhen seemingly the only place that has it's act together (relatively speaking) ? It's starting to be embarrassing !" *mumbles something about wanting to buy American and how that's worked out for him so far* Cheap labor, massive workforce, and infrastructure that's already present. Fixed uhh ok... I guess the wages in foxconn was so good that out of excitement they decided to jump off roofs... Danny The suicide rate amongst Foxconn workers is lower than the national average. People queue up to try to get a job there.
|
|
|
|
|
||bit
|
|
January 31, 2014, 10:10:18 PM |
|
If I'm not mistaken with my sources, laser systems capable of 11nm lithography are already deployed to major chip mfg('s)... but that does not mean you should expect 11nm anytime soon. They may still want to milk the public of all they can at the next larger architectures before obsoleting their product
|
|
|
|
|