ico_reviews (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 101
ICO reviews through objective analysis
|
|
December 07, 2017, 10:11:21 AM |
|
At CryptoRated, ICOs are rated using a standardized scorecard, developed as a means of evaluating and comparing ICOs systematically and consistently, on the same terms and accounting for the same necessary fundamentals. (It’s also colorful and fun to use.) https://cryptorated.com/ico-request-pipeline/The scorecard facilitates rating each ICO along seven categories: whitepaper quality, product offering, use of blockchain technology, development roadmap, company/team, regulatory compliance, and token sale structure. Each category is an aggregate of five essential, category-specific items, including the quality of the business plan and technology presentations (in the whitepaper), the concreteness and feasibility of the project’s plans (in the development roadmap), the skill set relevance and balance (of the team), the need for a custom token and the level of system decentralization (in the use of blockchain technology), the value of the token as a utility and/or as a security (in regulatory compliance), and more. Each item is scored by the reviewer on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), with examples given for the kind of impression that relates to each score. These scores combined provide a rating for each of the seven categories, which in turn make up the overall average rating for the ICO. Cast your vote to get the ICO of your choice reviewed first. You can vote for as many ICOs as you would like once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
moonblocks
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 714
Merit: 100
3... 2... 1... Launch!
|
|
December 07, 2017, 10:17:17 AM |
|
Had a quick look through your website and noticed the CareerXon ICO in the list which was cancelled recently (unless somethings changed) but besides that it looks fine
|
|
|
|
ico_reviews (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 101
ICO reviews through objective analysis
|
|
December 10, 2017, 08:03:28 AM |
|
Thank you for the update! We'll update accordingly.
|
|
|
|
psp_
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 105
The future is your Genome
|
|
December 10, 2017, 08:33:51 AM |
|
this project look very similar with Wings DAO. Will you make partnership with this project or another forecasting project like cindicator or gnosis?
|
|
|
|
HongKong
|
|
December 10, 2017, 08:38:10 AM |
|
At CryptoRated, ICOs are rated using a standardized scorecard, developed as a means of evaluating and comparing ICOs systematically and consistently, on the same terms and accounting for the same necessary fundamentals. (It’s also colorful and fun to use.) https://cryptorated.com/ico-request-pipeline/The scorecard facilitates rating each ICO along seven categories: whitepaper quality, product offering, use of blockchain technology, development roadmap, company/team, regulatory compliance, and token sale structure. Each category is an aggregate of five essential, category-specific items, including the quality of the business plan and technology presentations (in the whitepaper), the concreteness and feasibility of the project’s plans (in the development roadmap), the skill set relevance and balance (of the team), the need for a custom token and the level of system decentralization (in the use of blockchain technology), the value of the token as a utility and/or as a security (in regulatory compliance), and more. Each item is scored by the reviewer on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), with examples given for the kind of impression that relates to each score. These scores combined provide a rating for each of the seven categories, which in turn make up the overall average rating for the ICO. Cast your vote to get the ICO of your choice reviewed first. You can vote for as many ICOs as you would like once. Have you ever given any thought to updating the website design? Some people don't like having to scroll through 70 yards of information.
|
|
|
|
ico_reviews (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 101
ICO reviews through objective analysis
|
|
December 17, 2017, 09:19:45 AM |
|
At CryptoRated, ICOs are rated using a standardized scorecard, developed as a means of evaluating and comparing ICOs systematically and consistently, on the same terms and accounting for the same necessary fundamentals. (It’s also colorful and fun to use.) https://cryptorated.com/ico-request-pipeline/The scorecard facilitates rating each ICO along seven categories: whitepaper quality, product offering, use of blockchain technology, development roadmap, company/team, regulatory compliance, and token sale structure. Each category is an aggregate of five essential, category-specific items, including the quality of the business plan and technology presentations (in the whitepaper), the concreteness and feasibility of the project’s plans (in the development roadmap), the skill set relevance and balance (of the team), the need for a custom token and the level of system decentralization (in the use of blockchain technology), the value of the token as a utility and/or as a security (in regulatory compliance), and more. Each item is scored by the reviewer on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), with examples given for the kind of impression that relates to each score. These scores combined provide a rating for each of the seven categories, which in turn make up the overall average rating for the ICO. Cast your vote to get the ICO of your choice reviewed first. You can vote for as many ICOs as you would like once. Have you ever given any thought to updating the website design? Some people don't like having to scroll through 70 yards of information. The reviews on CryptoRated are thorough and extensive which requires several paragraphs of textual review. We are about to launch another format that will contain less information and will focus on ratings. If you have any suggestions, we'll be happy to consider! feel free to contact us at info@cryptorated.com or PM here.
|
|
|
|
ico_reviews (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 101
ICO reviews through objective analysis
|
|
December 17, 2017, 01:52:34 PM |
|
this project look very similar with Wings DAO. Will you make partnership with this project or another forecasting project like cindicator or gnosis?
We are currently in discussion with several platforms to expend the community-generated forecasting in the platform. We're always open to feedback at info@cryptorated.com
|
|
|
|
ico_reviews (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 101
ICO reviews through objective analysis
|
|
January 21, 2018, 08:43:34 AM |
|
X8 is now in review!
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
January 22, 2018, 11:04:55 AM |
|
X8 is now in review!
True.. i reported a pile of your spam topics and staff will be on your ass noob. Don't be surprise if your banned.. you deserve it.
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
wolfde
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 11:28:21 AM |
|
this is a great project ever. i wish this project a big success in the near future. goodluck dev.
|
|
|
|
|