Calling top at $16500 (New speculation: Guess the price 19 Feb 2021!)

[JayJuanGee]

Did you know that Tether have printed *8 BILLION* USDT in the 30 day extension that the NYAG gave them?

Did you know Peter McCormack said "Craig Wright submitted a crazy amount of evidence that he is Satoshi in my lawsuit"?

Did you know that trial starts tomorrow?

Does news like this not make it to Bitcoinlandia?

Who cares?  


Apparently, you do, sgbett.  Probably sucks to be "a lost puppy" like you.

hahahahahahaha

 

[1714146310]

1714146310

[1714146310]

1714146310

[Torque]

Did you know Peter McCormack said "Craig Wright submitted a crazy amount of evidence that he is Satoshi in my lawsuit"?

But not the one thing that would unequivocally prove it. 

[Wind_FURY]

Here's a fun image for you all to think about

You find that funny, but if Bitcoin truly crashes, it would take everything down and crash all the shitcoins too, including your precious Bitcoin Cash SV. I am very sure of it.

Plus, let’s be honest, Bitcoin Cash SV will NEVER be considered “the Bitcoin” by the community.

[nutildah]

You all seem stuck in a never ending loop of "Bitcoin is a vehicle to get more dollars" and it is excruciating for me to watch. It's like the Allegory of the cave. Stop looking at the wall, there is so much more to be seen if you would care to look.

What? Project much?

I don't agree with that sentiment at all.

We just want to point out the many ways in which you are wrong so people don't accidentally take your awful advice. You have been unflinchingly wrong for 3 years. To me, that would be painful to watch if it weren't funny.

[sgbett]

I'm also unflinching in my wondering of why Peter McCoremack has dropped the defence of "truth".

[Torque]

I'm also unflinching in my wondering of why Peter McCoremack has dropped the defence of "truth".

Something something "no proof", something something "need signed message", perhaps?

[sgbett]

I'm also unflinching in my wondering of why Peter McCoremack has dropped the defence of "truth".

Something something "no proof", something something "need signed message", perhaps?

I think you misunderstand, Peter's "truth" defence is that Craig is *not* Satoshi (truth being the perfect defence to defamation).

Peter is not pursuing that defence, instead he is trying to mitigate the damage.

If Peter was right then he would not have dropped the truth defence.

I can't make this any clearer.

[nutildah]

I can't make this any clearer.

Can't make what any clearer? Your steadfast dedication to a tangential sideshow? Anything to take attention off the fact that your dev is a fraudulent con artist?

You know what takes precedence over interpretations of adherence to a white paper, at least in the minds of users of decentralized financial products (as spoken by market demand)?

That the administrator of the system not be a giant fraud.

[600watt]

peter does not at all want to imply that craig is satoshi. that was a discussion about evidence.

you really believe craig is satoshi?

[Wind_FURY]

peter does not at all want to imply that craig is satoshi. that was a discussion about evidence.

you really believe craig is satoshi?

I have been asking the same question, and I have never seen a simple yes or no answer, because they know he is not Satoshi, BUT wants to confuse you to believe that he “might be Satoshi”. Plus why would Satoshi expose himself ? He was very careful, and did extra steps to hide his real identity.

[sgbett]

peter does not at all want to imply that craig is satoshi. that was a discussion about evidence.

you really believe craig is satoshi?

I have been asking the same question, and I have never seen a simple yes or no answer, because they know he is not Satoshi, BUT wants to confuse you to believe that he “might be Satoshi”. Plus why would Satoshi expose himself ? He was very careful, and did extra steps to hide his real identity.

Weird how I am neither confused, or doing the confusing. I have been very clear.

600watt - of course Peter doesn't! The truth defence was about the exact opposite. That Peter's claim that "CSW is a fraud" is truth. That's the truth defence! That's what has been dropped! Peter knows his claim "CSW is a fraud" is not true. Peter knows CSW is Satoshi.

Wind_FURY - its patently obvious that CSW is Satoshi to anyone that has taken the time to find out for themselves. I am not confusing anyone, he is and he is proving it. NOT by signing a block (because then you would all suddenly decide that keys != proof of identity, which he has stated all along). Instead he is  producing "a crazy amount of evidence" in court.

You don't like him, and he knows it, and he is using that against you all because he hates what you stand for. He hates anarchy, anonymity and the criminal endeavours facilitated by anonymity. Here then, is the one thing that I *have* changed my view on over the years. I thought I was anarchist. I thought Bitcoin was taking down the governments and the banks and all of that business, but now I recognise the problems that come with that. I understand the need for (minimal) government. The need for law. How Bitcoin was always designed to operate within the existing regulatory frameworks. I know these things because I have *verified* them myself. I have not trusted a 3rd Party.

All of this is in plain sight outside of Bitcoinlandia. You think Peter has your back? You think any of those people on Twitter pumping BTC have your back? They do not. They care about themselves and their $$$ profits from convincing rubes to buy and HODL.

And here remains the one overwhelmingly obvious sign in all of this. I *still* don't recommend you buy BSV.

BSV is Bitcoin though.

just 2 more days

[600watt]

astonishing how people can believe the craziest shit. sorry for your loss. not only the monetary loss. the obvious loss of intellectual honesty.

 

[Torque]

Wind_FURY - its patently obvious that CSW is Satoshi to anyone that has taken the time to find out for themselves. I am not confusing anyone, he is and he is proving it. NOT by signing a block (because then you would all suddenly decide that keys != proof of identity, which he has stated all along). Instead he is  producing "a crazy amount of evidence" in court.

[Wind_FURY]

astonishing how people can believe the craziest shit. sorry for your loss. not only the monetary loss. the obvious loss of intellectual honesty.

 

I wanted him to say that very clearly.

Plus saying that “BSV is Bitcoin”. I don’t believe it comes down to Satoshi, the real Satoshi not the fake one, what is and what is not Bitcoin.

[sgbett]

Wind_FURY - its patently obvious that CSW is Satoshi to anyone that has taken the time to find out for themselves. I am not confusing anyone, he is and he is proving it. NOT by signing a block (because then you would all suddenly decide that keys != proof of identity, which he has stated all along). Instead he is  producing "a crazy amount of evidence" in court.

Would you have preferred "anyway it doesn't matter what satoshi thinks Bitcoin has moved on"?

[Torque]

Wind_FURY - its patently obvious that CSW is Satoshi to anyone that has taken the time to find out for themselves. I am not confusing anyone, he is and he is proving it. NOT by signing a block (because then you would all suddenly decide that keys != proof of identity, which he has stated all along). Instead he is  producing "a crazy amount of evidence" in court.

Would you have preferred "anyway it doesn't matter what satoshi thinks Bitcoin has moved on"?

Actually, the Bitcoin community has moved on from caring about who Satoshi is, you're just too slow to see it.

Bitcoin was an idea born from Satoshi; who he is (or they are) is no longer relevant to what Bitcoin has become today. The codebase has evolved over a decade by the hands of hundreds of devs, and will continue to evolve. It is open source for all to see and work on. No one person that works on it is special. Deal with it.

It's only you small-minded idiots who still care about who Satoshi is and what that person(s) may think about the current state of Bitcoin at this point.

Hence your infatuation with the total fraud named Craig Wright and his completely forked shitcoin.

[acquafredda]

We are all Satoshi now, except CSW (and Roger).
BSV with a kind of dragonball logo cannot ever be considered bitcoin.
Do you know why CSW can never even be close to be the real SN?
Because SN was an humble guy in the first place and he could have never been such a lunatic.

And like Torque suggests, let us discuss ideas not people.

[thecodebear]

Only two days until we find out if sgbett's prediction of Bitcoin at $2xxx will be correct lol....he'll only be off by about $50k, or about 2600% haha

If only sgbett had added a 5 in front of his prediction he would have been spot on!


Bitcoin is at $52k while the scam coin BSV is at $244. sgbett you either forgot to put a 5 in front of your price or you actually meant BSV (since you for some reason are gullible enough to buy into the fraud CSW) and you just forgot to take out a digit and meant $200-something for your prediction haha.

[nutildah]

Bitcoin was an idea born from Satoshi; who he is (or they are) is no longer relevant to what Bitcoin has become today. The codebase has evolved over a decade by the hands of hundreds of devs, and will continue to evolve. It is open source for all to see and work on. No one person that works on it is special. Deal with it.

It's only you small-minded idiots who still care about who Satoshi is and what that person(s) may think about the current state of Bitcoin at this point.

Hence your infatuation with the total fraud named Craig Wright and his completely forked shitcoin.

And like Torque suggests, let us discuss ideas not people.

Yeah! So c'mon everybody, let's get sgbett! GET HIM!!



 

[Wexlike]

600watt - of course Peter doesn't! The truth defence was about the exact opposite. That Peter's claim that "CSW is a fraud" is truth. That's the truth defence! That's what has been dropped! Peter knows his claim "CSW is a fraud" is not true. Peter knows CSW is Satoshi.

Wind_FURY - its patently obvious that CSW is Satoshi to anyone that has taken the time to find out for themselves. I am not confusing anyone, he is and he is proving it. NOT by signing a block (because then you would all suddenly decide that keys != proof of identity, which he has stated all along). Instead he is  producing "a crazy amount of evidence" in court.

You don't like him, and he knows it, and he is using that against you all because he hates what you stand for. He hates anarchy, anonymity and the criminal endeavours facilitated by anonymity. *skip*

BSV is Bitcoin though.

just 2 more days

This is just hilarious. And simultaneously sad. Guess it is probably time to move this thread to the altcoin section, so it gets buried away for good.