Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 04:37:20 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: good post system  (Read 1732 times)
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
July 03, 2011, 10:41:26 AM
 #1

we need this:

http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?mod=1890

I know the last attempt on an applaud / smite system failed badly. That was because it was user based not post based and because it allowed down votes.

I am not sure if it is possible to disallow downvotes with this mod. Anyway, it seems a lot better than the previous one and we should give it a try.

screenshot:




blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
1480739840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480739840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480739840
Reply with quote  #2

1480739840
Report to moderator
1480739840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480739840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480739840
Reply with quote  #2

1480739840
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480739840
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480739840

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480739840
Reply with quote  #2

1480739840
Report to moderator
BitcoinPorn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560


Posts: 69


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2011, 12:17:22 PM
 #2

+1

I'd like to try that out, never used a forum with that.

Jimerson
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
July 06, 2011, 11:08:55 PM
 #3

I think this would be a good thing. Quite a few boards have a "Thank user for this post" feature.
amincd
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 772


View Profile
July 08, 2011, 05:55:37 AM
 #4

I like it. I think elimination of the signature saves space and makes the threads more readable.
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
July 08, 2011, 04:51:34 PM
 #5

I like it. I think elimination of the signature saves space and makes the threads more readable.
that really was not the point - signatures are superb.

I simply do not have the time to read through 100 posts every day to find the jewels.

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
July 12, 2011, 09:06:18 AM
 #6

who can make this decision? btw: what is "command structure" behind the bitcoin board?

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
cunicula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


Stack-overflow Guru


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2011, 09:43:58 AM
 #7

upvoting is a really good idea. However, I think it would be better to allow weighted upvoting. I would give the upvotes of users whose posts are often upvoted extra weight. Weighting should be based on a geometric average of the users' average number of upvotes per post and the users' total number of upvotes.

For example, upvote weight = (average upvotes per post)^0.9 * (total number of upvotes)^0.1
The opinions of users without any upvotes would be given zero weight.

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
        AltCoinInternalExperts                Get Your Altcoin Promoted On Social Media       
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492


View Profile
July 12, 2011, 09:57:24 AM
 #8

I really dislike the idea of showing scores that are universal across the board, as it discourages controversial viewpoints and creates a need for more moderation. A true web of trust would be good, though it could not be a replacement for fixing the moderation system.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
cunicula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


Stack-overflow Guru


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2011, 10:07:04 AM
 #9

I really dislike the idea of showing scores that are universal across the board, as it discourages controversial viewpoints and creates a need for more moderation. A true web of trust would be good, though it could not be a replacement for fixing the moderation system.

Scores do not necessarily discourage controversial viewpoints. Someone offering a good expression of an opinion held by a small minority can easily score far higher than someone repeating stuff people have heard before. Tp achieve this, it is important here to make voting limited (e.g. one upvote per user per day).

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
        AltCoinInternalExperts                Get Your Altcoin Promoted On Social Media       
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
July 12, 2011, 10:09:21 AM
 #10

upvoting is a really good idea. However, I think it would be better to allow weighted upvoting. I would give the upvotes of users whose posts are often upvoted extra weight. Weighting should be based on a geometric average of the users' average number of upvotes per post and the users' total number of upvotes.

For example, upvote weight = (average upvotes per post)^0.9 * (total number of upvotes)^0.1
The opinions of users without any upvotes would be given zero weight.

this sure would be nice but not necessary to start

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
cunicula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


Stack-overflow Guru


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2011, 10:11:21 AM
 #11

upvoting is a really good idea. However, I think it would be better to allow weighted upvoting. I would give the upvotes of users whose posts are often upvoted extra weight. Weighting should be based on a geometric average of the users' average number of upvotes per post and the users' total number of upvotes.

For example, upvote weight = (average upvotes per post)^0.9 * (total number of upvotes)^0.1
The opinions of users without any upvotes would be given zero weight.

this sure would be nice but not necessary to start

Ya, I agree weighting is 'nice but not necessary'

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
        AltCoinInternalExperts                Get Your Altcoin Promoted On Social Media       
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
July 12, 2011, 10:12:12 AM
 #12

I really dislike the idea of showing scores that are universal across the board, as it discourages controversial viewpoints and creates a need for more moderation. A true web of trust would be good, though it could not be a replacement for fixing the moderation system.

Scores do not necessarily discourage controversial viewpoints. Someone offering a good expression of an opinion held by a small minority can easily score far higher than someone repeating stuff people have heard before. Tp achieve this, it is important here to make voting limited (e.g. one upvote per user per day).
+1  Grin

if it really should not work we can still get rid of it. without downvoting I do not think there will be any problem.

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
peach
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


An intermediary stage in the breakdown of stars


View Profile
July 12, 2011, 04:11:19 PM
 #13

I wouldn't like to see this implemented. Forums have their place. We are not Reddit.

DO IT
1ENhnpoUohq58A2xu5LxKejAeet9PxzrCg
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
August 08, 2011, 05:40:04 PM
 #14

bump!

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
TheBitMan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280



View Profile
August 14, 2011, 11:33:59 AM
 #15

I always thought of that but never brought it up, I would like to see that.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!